SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rearranged lines

Created by: Klara
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 17, 2021
Published: Jan. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
- the 3rd line needs to stay together, they work really well even if they haven't produced a goal yet.

- Balcers needs to make the bottom 6 if he comes here and clearly neither Marleau nor Kellman are up to the task of being the 4C, that leaves one of Chmelevski, Gambrell, or Handemark. Chmelevski is my favorite, but Gambrell still could prove he can be that bottom 6 player. Not big into what I've seen of Handemark in Sweden.

- Hard to make any changes to the top 6 since the Hertl line has been good, while the Couture line has been alright.

- Ferraro has easily been the best defenseman, and Karlsson hasn't been good, but Vlasic hasn't been either, put Ferraro with Karlsson to provide two very fast D who can move the puck. See if Simek can play with Burns when he gets back, and if not, try Vlasic-Burns, which worked surprisingly well during the 2019 Playoffs. I'm interested in seeing if Pasnichuck will be given a shot, but I think Knyzhov or Middleton should be good to pair with Vlasic.

- Marleau is on the 4th because its Marleau, though really should be Noesen.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$71,928,333$0$1,472,500$9,571,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$735,000$735,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 ($425,000$425K$425,000$425K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$780,000$780,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 17, 2021 at 4:27 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Pretty solid. I’m very interested to see what Balcers can do when he gets here. And I think Handemark will likely be playing over Chmelevski for FO reasons. But I would like to see Sasha get the call.
yikes liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 4:52 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 160
Likes: 47
I think they will try Donato- Gregor -Balcers and drop Nieto to the 4th line.

I’d also like to see Knyzhov will a real NHL partner before trying any of the other D we have.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 8:33 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 4,535
I thought Sorenson played very solid in game 1 (I wasn’t able to see game 2)
From what I saw, Karlsson was on Ice for all of Arizona’s goals in game 1 and I believe at Least 2 in game 2, that is pathetic, any other player would have been benched, why is this lazy worthless man considered elite (maybe elite waste of money)
Jan. 18, 2021 at 12:39 a.m.
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,057
Likes: 12,816
Edited Jan. 18, 2021 at 12:47 a.m.
I have the lines exactly the same way you've oriented them - I agree with what you said completely (except for Karlsson, hes been okay; still needs to show more but I have my opinion that hes clearly easing into the season and being reserved due to his past injury and lack of preseason to be sure hes 100% for a NHL year, instead of killing himself like he used to do in the past). I like the lineup you put up and hope its the one we see. If anything were to be different Id say Id hope to see playing Simek on pair 1 and use Ferraro's strength with Burns to hopefully get him to wake up on pair 2. To split up Karlsson and Ferraro (our two best D currently).

Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I thought Sorenson played very solid in game 1 (I wasn’t able to see game 2)
From what I saw, Karlsson was on Ice for all of Arizona’s goals in game 1 and I believe at Least 2 in game 2, that is pathetic, any other player would have been benched, why is this lazy worthless man considered elite (maybe elite waste of money)


being on for a goal doesnt mean you suck - because if thats the way things worked than all goalies suck cause theyre on for every goal. (Plus minus is a very old and archaic stat that is worthless).
Karlsson has NOT been bad. Game 1; tough but he wasnt bad, wasnt good - he was average and played 32 minutes while he clearly was just warming up ( it was evident ), while I would only say 1 goal was partly his fault (the third, but karlsson isnt a physical player and would only be physical if it was the playoffs when its on the line, so yes he can be "blamed" but the goal was also just a unlucky bounce that squeaked through Jones).
Game 2 Karlsson was better and 90% of the team sucked; he was not part of that 90%. Hes also being over used due to our lack of a real third pair (except for Knyzhov), and lack of a top 4 (with Vlasic and Burns being underwhelming).

So lol...no he will not be benched nor is he worthless.
Klara liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll