SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Colliton wont play them trade them

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 17, 2021
Published: Jan. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Not a realisitc situation, but yes i'm frustrated at how little playing time colliton gives some of our only skilled forwards. Maybe theres a reason why we get doubled up in shot attempts every game?

Lines assembled as colliton would intend them to be
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2021 1st round pick (CBJ)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (CBJ)
2.
CHI
  1. 2021 1st round pick (TOR)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
3.
CHI
  1. 2021 1st round pick (BUF)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$55,301,314$1,090,244$2,715,000$26,198,686
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:00 p.m.
#1
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Why aren’t they getting more playing time?
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:05 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Isles777
Why aren’t they getting more playing time?


Especially strome... who else would they possibly play at C?
csick liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:07 p.m.
#3
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: mhockey91
Especially strome... who else would they possibly play at C?


Good point - kubalik was one of the best offensive forwards in the league last season, doesn’t make sense to limit his ice time
mhockey91 and csick liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:07 p.m.
#4
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Colliton has to go
#BringinGallant
csick, mhockey91, Wadejos123 and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:08 p.m.
#5
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Quoting: mhockey91
Especially strome... who else would they possibly play at C?


Suter has been playing very well for Chicago at center
mhockey91, csick, Wadejos123 and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:16 p.m.
#6
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,570
Likes: 23,741
#FireTheCoach
Wadejos123 and Hawks_Are_Dumm liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:19 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,162
Quoting: Isles777
Why aren’t they getting more playing time?


Because of the wonderboy coach who just got a brand new extenstion
mhockey91 and Hawks_Are_Dumm liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:30 p.m.
#8
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: SlickWilly
Because of the wonderboy coach who just got a brand new extenstion


I’m wondering is there a reason why those players are in his doghouse? Turnovers, defensive play - or does he just hate playing young players.
Hawks_Are_Dumm liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:36 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,162
Quoting: Isles777
I’m wondering is there a reason why those players are in his doghouse? Turnovers, defensive play - or does he just hate playing young players.


I dont think he "hates" them, his whole shtick is like "oh yeah I'm a defensive coach" so he plays the guys like Carpenter-Highmore-Kampf and Wallmark-Janmark-Shaw a lot because they happen to be defensive minded but hes offensively incompetent
Hawks_Are_Dumm liked this.
Jan. 17, 2021 at 10:54 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 610
DeHaan Murphy was a very good pair against Tampa Bay
Jan. 18, 2021 at 12:02 a.m.
#11
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,661
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Isles777
Why aren’t they getting more playing time?


Colliton has two brain cells.
Isles777, yikes, Wadejos123 and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 18, 2021 at 7:49 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 4,896
Quoting: Isles777
Why aren’t they getting more playing time?


colliton stinks at coaching. Kubalik is getting like 11-13 mins
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 18, 2021 at 7:50 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 4,896
Quoting: csick
#FireTheCoach


no no, stan just extends him for two more years. It's fu**ing rediculous
mhockey91 and csick liked this.
Jan. 18, 2021 at 7:51 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,256
Likes: 4,896
Quoting: mhockey91
Especially strome... who else would they possibly play at C?


Colliton things Jahnmark and Wallmark are top 6 players when really all they are is PK guys.
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 18, 2021 at 11:24 a.m.
#15
NTanger19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 219
Likes: 58
TOR accepts and hangs up right away
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll