SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Whatever

Created by: icehawk2006
Published: Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 106/116 (91%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsColumbus Blue Jackets

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Dubois, Pierre-LucColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$4,568,965111---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Labanc, KevinSan Jose SharksNHL-$4,317,672111---0000--
Dahlén, JonathanSan Jose SharksLoan-$0011---0000--
2021 1st round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,720,6302343593513
Change$251,293011100
Final$1,971,923 (↑)2344 (↑)60 (↑)4 (↑)513000

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Labanc, KevinSan Jose SharksNHL-$4,317,672111---0000--
Dahlén, JonathanSan Jose SharksLoan-$0011---0000--
2021 1st round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Dubois, Pierre-LucColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$4,568,965111---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,394,7622348673512
Change-$251,2930-1-1-100
Final$1,143,469 (↓)2347 (↓)66 (↓)2 (↓)512000
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:41 p.m.
#1
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
That 1st is gonna be very good and Dahlen's stats are good but CBJ doesn't want futures in this deal. If this lasts to the deadline and CBJ is out of contention this makes some sense.
Jan. 23, 2021 at 6:05 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: reelkena
That 1st is gonna be very good and Dahlen's stats are good but CBJ doesn't want futures in this deal. If this lasts to the deadline and CBJ is out of contention this makes some sense.


Thanks for the feedback. This isn’t a futures deal. Labanc is a now player with term. Under Torts he will quickly be a top 6 player. Dahlen is a now player also, just the Sharks are stacked with LW. The 1st gives CBJ a middle pick that will likely turn into an nhl player, as a sweetener.
Jan. 23, 2021 at 6:11 a.m.
#3
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: icehawk2006
Thanks for the feedback. This isn’t a futures deal. Labanc is a now player with term. Under Torts he will quickly be a top 6 player. Dahlen is a now player also, just the Sharks are stacked with LW. The 1st gives CBJ a middle pick that will likely turn into an nhl player, as a sweetener.


It is a futures deal. You have 2 futures in it. Lebanc isn't a top 2 piece in this trade. The pick wont be middle it will be top 10 and it isn't a sweetener. Dahlen is the sweetener.
Jan. 23, 2021 at 6:29 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: reelkena
It is a futures deal. You have 2 futures in it. Lebanc isn't a top 2 piece in this trade. The pick wont be middle it will be top 10 and it isn't a sweetener. Dahlen is the sweetener.


You’re just not correct. Labanc projects to be a mid 50 pt player that’s a PP quarterback. That’s easy top 6 winger. Not even debateable. Unless you want to go over to the athletic and tell Dom he’s wrong. He and PLD are the top 2 pieces in this deal. He has term, so he’s not going anywhere, and he’s not a prospect. Dahlen isn’t a prospect, per se, either. He will come in and immediately help CBJ in their bottom 6. A top 6 and a bottom 6 immediate impact trade is the definition of Not A Futures trade.

With PLD in the lineup on a daily basis, the Sharks are unlikely to be so bad as to draft in the top 10. They probably are barely inside of the top 10 right now and probably won’t be by the end of the season. Adding PLD ensures that.
Jan. 23, 2021 at 1:13 p.m.
#5
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: icehawk2006
You’re just not correct. Labanc projects to be a mid 50 pt player that’s a PP quarterback. That’s easy top 6 winger. Not even debateable. Unless you want to go over to the athletic and tell Dom he’s wrong. He and PLD are the top 2 pieces in this deal. He has term, so he’s not going anywhere, and he’s not a prospect. Dahlen isn’t a prospect, per se, either. He will come in and immediately help CBJ in their bottom 6. A top 6 and a bottom 6 immediate impact trade is the definition of Not A Futures trade.

With PLD in the lineup on a daily basis, the Sharks are unlikely to be so bad as to draft in the top 10. They probably are barely inside of the top 10 right now and probably won’t be by the end of the season. Adding PLD ensures that.


They wanted an upgrade. Labanc wasn't an upgade. The pieces that put this deal over the top were the futures. Making this a futures deal. thinking Dahlen comes right in and has an impact would be wrong, thinking the pick will be mid is unlikely. Don't try to hide behind Dom.
Jan. 23, 2021 at 4:47 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: reelkena
They wanted an upgrade. Labanc wasn't an upgade. The pieces that put this deal over the top were the futures. Making this a futures deal. thinking Dahlen comes right in and has an impact would be wrong, thinking the pick will be mid is unlikely. Don't try to hide behind Dom.


Lolololol. The trade that just happened was only marginally better than this trade and included futures. Dahlen is projected to come in and make an immediate impact and is equitable in value to Roslavic. Literally almost the exact same projected numbers. Dahlen would have been better than any of Columbus bottom 6 at the time. To say he wouldn’t have made an immediate impact is intentional ignorance. Thinking the pick is going to be outside the top 10, if the Sharks managed to snag PLD, with one of the best top 6 in the West, is not only possible, but prudent. Thinking otherwise is pure insanity. Dom literally published the bounds of what a good top 6 looks like in the NHL. Guess what? Labanc falls well within those bound. Referencing an expert isn’t hiding, that is called providing evidence. Is what smart people do argue their points. Only stupid people provide their opinions as facts...
Jan. 23, 2021 at 5:35 p.m.
#7
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: icehawk2006
Lolololol. The trade that just happened was only marginally better than this trade and included futures. Dahlen is projected to come in and make an immediate impact and is equitable in value to Roslavic. Literally almost the exact same projected numbers. Dahlen would have been better than any of Columbus bottom 6 at the time. To say he wouldn’t have made an immediate impact is intentional ignorance. Thinking the pick is going to be outside the top 10, if the Sharks managed to snag PLD, with one of the best top 6 in the West, is not only possible, but prudent. Thinking otherwise is pure insanity. Dom literally published the bounds of what a good top 6 looks like in the NHL. Guess what? Labanc falls well within those bound. Referencing an expert isn’t hiding, that is called providing evidence. Is what smart people do argue their points. Only stupid people provide their opinions as facts...


"Dahlen is projected to come in and make an immediate impact"

We traded him out of Utica because he was having issues within the team. He went to SJ and hasn't made the club in two years. Where is this projection and what does it amount to? He's 23 and hasn't played an NHL game. Don't just make up things and base your whole argument behind them. I know Dahlen's story, my team drafted him.

I also didn't read the rest of your thing because what's the point anymore.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll