Not enough for Brannstrom. Don't forget they had to give up Stone.

the coach that wont coach him will get fired before Dorion trades him

Brannstrom would be a perfect fit in Montreal, with their low ceilings in the locker rooms.

What does that mean?

He’d be a great addition the the Hab 3 on 3 pickup basketball games, with Gallagher, Byron, Mete, Tatar, and Weal, unless they want to wait on Caufield??

Well I’m even more confused. Tatar & Gallagher are already top 6 NHL forwards in their prime, and Weal was never expected to have a high ceiling. And Caufield’s the only prospect you mentioned, but he obviously doesn’t have a low ceiling.

And what on earth is 3 on 3 basketball supposed to mean? Is this some sort of inside joke about the Senators playing basketball?

I'm assuming he means their height lol. But two of the four aren't even playing and Gallagher plays like he is 6'6" lol. But he also forgets all the trees we have on D

You really know how to take a joke, you must be great at parties. You’re not getting Brannstrom, how’s that for a serious response?

I could tell it was a joke, I just didn’t know what the joke was about. I’ve never seen Brannstrom play, so I wouldn’t know how tall he is. And he’s 5’10, so he’s not even that short at all anyways.

Although I still don’t understand what the 3 on 3 basketball means. Are the shorter players used when a team has less players on the court? Sort of like how faster players are generally used 3 on 3 in the NHL?

Six players mentioned, 3 on 3 is a popular form of basketball.