SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Please Ken

Created by: Eberles_Backcheck
Team: 2021-22 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2021
Published: Feb. 7, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$3,850,000
2$1,900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,750,000
7$7,000,000
1$900,000
2$1,000,000
2$3,000,000
3$2,750,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Konovalov, Ilya [Reserve List]
  3. Koskinen, Mikko
  4. Russell, Kris
  5. Savoie, Carter [Reserve List]
  6. 2021 1st round pick (EDM)
  7. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Konovalov could be very good, he projects as well as guys like Samsonov, Shesterkin and Sorokin did/do. Just don't think they can wait 3 years for him.
2.
EDM
    To Seattle
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the EDM
    2022
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    2023
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$76,433,506$669,339$907,500$5,066,494
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $12,500,000$12,500,000
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,175,000$1,175,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,900,000$1,900,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $3,850,000$3,850,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $900,000$900,000
    C
    UFA
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $3,200,000$3,200,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $5,600,000$5,600,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $825,000$825,000
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $725,000$725,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $4,167,000$4,167,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:43 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    That doesn’t even come close to the ducks being interested
    Salzy, Borocop and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:43 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Unless Charelli got hired in ANA they arent trading Gibson, especially for that

    Quantity does not get you quality

    Especially when the Quality is the best goalie on the best contract in the league
    coga16, OldNYIfan and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:44 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 6,208
    Likes: 2,508
    Kosk, Pulj, yama for Gibson.. might still need to add
    LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:44 p.m.
    #4
    Zinner21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 271
    Likes: 70
    Man.. Gibson would be a dream.. but yes I don't think that is something Anaheim would be interested in.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:46 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: coga16
    That doesn’t even come close to the ducks being interested


    Quoting: Salzy
    Unless Charelli got hired in ANA they arent trading Gibson, especially for that

    Quantity does not get you quality

    Especially when the Quality is the best goalie on the best contract in the league


    So what's fair for Gibson then? I'm curious.
    LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:47 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    So what's fair for Gibson then? I'm curious.


    Theres nothing that EDM would offer that even gets ANA on the phone.

    It needs to be enough to end ANAs rebuild and at that point why would they trade Gibson.

    He isnt being traded, theres nothing that any team would offer that would make ANA consider moving him.

    Im not comparing the two at all, but what would be fair for McDavid? EDM isnt going to trade him just like ANA isnt going to trade Gibson
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 2:54 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    So what's fair for Gibson then? I'm curious.


    More than you are comfortably wiling to give up as avs oilers fan, like including Holloway or Bouchard for starters
    Borocop, OldNYIfan and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:01 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Salzy
    Theres nothing that EDM would offer that even gets ANA on the phone.

    It needs to be enough to end ANAs rebuild and at that point why would they trade Gibson.

    He isnt being traded, theres nothing that any team would offer that would make ANA consider moving him.

    Im not comparing the two at all, but what would be fair for McDavid? EDM isnt going to trade him just like ANA isnt going to trade Gibson


    To end their rebuild? So a number 1 centre and a number 1 D? Come on now.
    LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:03 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    To end their rebuild? So a number 1 centre and a number 1 D? Come on now.


    Yeah enough to end their rebuild. they have the future number one D and future 1C already. They have legitimately 0 reason to even entertain a Gibson trade, any team trying to get him needs to give them a reason too. EDM doesnt have a franchise level prospect in the system, it would take a franchise level forward prospect +++ to even get ANA on the phone. That price goes up when a division rival is whos trying to get him. Gibson is who ANA is building around they arent trading him
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:16 p.m.
    #10
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 23,555
    Likes: 12,308
    This isn't a bad offer but there's some quantity pieces in there of no use or interest to the Ducks.

    Honestly Gibson is keeping the Ducks from bottoming out, they should trade him for 3 or 4 good future pieces, move out a couple other guys and go into a full rebuild in my opinion.
    Eberles_Backcheck and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:28 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Salzy
    Yeah enough to end their rebuild. they have the future number one D and future 1C already. They have legitimately 0 reason to even entertain a Gibson trade, any team trying to get him needs to give them a reason too. EDM doesnt have a franchise level prospect in the system, it would take a franchise level forward prospect +++ to even get ANA on the phone. That price goes up when a division rival is whos trying to get him. Gibson is who ANA is building around they arent trading him


    Zegras and Drysdale? I think both will be very good and could be those pieces but I don't think you can just slot them in as those guys... Zegras maybe, forwards are usually easier to project. Drysdale is far less likely to be a number 1 than he is to be a number 1. You need multiple A+ prospects at certain positions.
    LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:31 p.m.
    #12
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Zegras and Drysdale? I think both will be very good and could be those pieces but I don't think you can just slot them in as those guys... Zegras maybe, forwards are usually easier to project. Drysdale is far less likely to be a number 1 than he is to be a number 1. You need multiple A+ prospects at certain positions.


    And you offered zero A prospects for Gibson let alone A+.
    Salzy, OldNYIfan and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:32 p.m.
    #13
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    This isn't a bad offer but there's some quantity pieces in there of no use or interest to the Ducks.

    Honestly Gibson is keeping the Ducks from bottoming out, they should trade him for 3 or 4 good future pieces, move out a couple other guys and go into a full rebuild in my opinion.


    Ducks don’t need 3 or 4 good pieces. They have plenty of quantity with their young players and prospects. They need quality and there isn’t any in this offer.
    OldNYIfan and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:33 p.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Jah1722
    And you offered zero A prospects for Gibson let alone A+.


    Broberg looks like a fantastic prospect. Edmonton will gladly keep him.
    LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:33 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Zegras and Drysdale? I think both will be very good and could be those pieces but I don't think you can just slot them in as those guys... Zegras maybe, forwards are usually easier to project. Drysdale is far less likely to be a number 1 than he is to be a number 1. You need multiple A+ prospects at certain positions.


    And the oilers dont have any A+ prospects to offer, they dont even have any A- to offer
    OldNYIfan and LGuy54 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:36 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Salzy
    And the oilers dont have any A+ prospects to offer, they dont even have any A- to offer


    Broberg is a blue chip prospect.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:37 p.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Broberg is a blue chip prospect.


    He is not a franchise level prospect, hes a good, not great prospect. To get Gibson you would need to offer a top 10 prospect in the league +++ and the Oilers dont have that
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:37 p.m.
    #18
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Broberg looks like a fantastic prospect. Edmonton will gladly keep him.


    Edmonton has a poor prospect pool and Broberg isn’t even their top prospect. Keep him.
    Salzy and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
    #19
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Broberg is a blue chip prospect.


    He’s not. He’s not even EDM best prospect.
    Salzy and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:39 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Jah1722
    Edmonton has a poor prospect pool and Broberg isn’t even their top prospect. Keep him.


    This statement alone is enough for me to not take you seriously. Their prospect pool is very very good. Brutal take my friend.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:40 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Jah1722
    Edmonton has a poor prospect pool and Broberg isn’t even their top prospect. Keep him.


    I wish I could like this 1000 times
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:40 p.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,135
    Likes: 5,933
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    This statement alone is enough for me to not take you seriously. Their prospect pool is very very good. Brutal take my friend.


    It isnt even a top 15 in the league prospect pool
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
    #23
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 791
    Likes: 223
    Quoting: Jah1722
    He’s not. He’s not even EDM best prospect.


    Just because he's not their best prospect doesn't mean he's no a blue chip prospect haha. Bouchard is better at this time. Doesn't make Broberg poor.
    CD282 liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:41 p.m.
    #24
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    This statement alone is enough for me to not take you seriously. Their prospect pool is very very good. Brutal take my friend.


    It’s actually not. It’s close to bottom third in the league.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Feb. 7, 2021 at 3:42 p.m.
    #25
    Jah1722
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 5,403
    Likes: 2,894
    Quoting: Eberles_Backcheck
    Just because he's not their best prospect doesn't mean he's no a blue chip prospect haha. Bouchard is better at this time. Doesn't make Broberg poor.


    He’s also not a blue chip prospect.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll