SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Created by: Fixitf
Team: 2021-22 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 9, 2021
Published: Feb. 9, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,000,000
2$750,000
2$800,000
2$1,000,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Neal, James
  2. Savoie, Carter [Reserve List]
  3. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
2.
PIT
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Virtanen, Jake
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (VAN)
3.
PIT
  1. Juulsen, Noah [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (FLA)
4.
PIT
  1. 2022 1st round pick (BOS)
  2. 2023 1st round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Letang, Kris ($3,625,000 retained)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
5.
PIT
  1. 2022 1st round pick (STL)
  2. 2023 1st round pick (STL)
STL
  1. Malkin, Evgeni ($4,750,000 retained)
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (FLA)
6.
TOR
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach [RFA Rights]
  2. Juulsen, Noah
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (PIT)
  4. 2023 5th round pick (PIT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$70,614,341$0$827,500$10,885,659

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,550,000$2,550,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$853,333$853,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$733,333$733,333 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.
#1
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,916
Likes: 3,575
Canucks fans may disagree but I would do that trade in a heart beat if I was Van
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Trolling im assuming
gmgb and Gofnut999 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:45 p.m.
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Bruins are pretty set at RD.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Two 1st rd picks for a 4th best center in StL. Seems reasonable....
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:53 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 304
I think Rust will be good for the oilers he can play with Mcdavid.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:55 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Trolling im assuming


It’s not, why do u think so?
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:56 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Quoting: Riley816
Two 1st rd picks for a 4th best center in StL. Seems reasonable....


Who other than O’reilly is better than Malkin?
Feb. 9, 2021 at 2:59 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Riley816
Two 1st rd picks for a 4th best center in StL. Seems reasonable....


Is this some sort of stupid joke? Wow
Chopper02 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Quoting: Fixitf
Who other than O’reilly is better than Malkin?


Better than a 35 year old with 2 goals??? Schenn. Thomas. Probably Sundqvist..
Feb. 9, 2021 at 3:01 p.m.
#10
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 28,467
Likes: 11,075
The Blues cannot afford that, don't need any more centers and definitely need to rebuild the prospect base. So that's gonna be a no.
Chopper02 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Edited Feb. 9, 2021 at 4:39 p.m.
Quoting: Riley816
Better than a 35 year old with 2 goals??? Schenn. Thomas. Probably Sundqvist..


He has had a slow start to the year, but he is still Malkin and will most likely pick it up. He had 74 points in 55 games last year, and the blues are getting him at 50% salary.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 4:50 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Fixitf
It’s not, why do u think so?


Because every trade sucks

anyone who thinks the bruins would give up two first for Kris letang either doesnt know hockey or is trolling.
Can you tell me who the bruins current RHD are ? ill do it for you because i dont want to wait for your response which will likely be self defense.
McAvoy and Carlo (with Clifton and Miller switching off as the 3rd)...
Bruins DONT need OR WANT Letang, AND the price sucks ass

As for your other trades:
Assuming Erikkson costs a 1st to take (less about what Backes was for the bruins), Zucker will CERTAINLY not get you a 2nd and Virtanen
Dumolin for Juulson and a 2nd is a joke
STL doesnt need or want more Centers so thats wrong
and the only one that might be ok (though I think it sucks) is the oilers one (but thats MY OPINION so up to you)

The rest of it tho besides the oilers one HAS TO be a troll job
Feb. 9, 2021 at 5:01 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Edited Feb. 9, 2021 at 5:15 p.m.
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Because every trade sucks

anyone who thinks the bruins would give up two first for Kris letang either doesnt know hockey or is trolling.
Can you tell me who the bruins current RHD are ? ill do it for you because i dont want to wait for your response which will likely be self defense.
McAvoy and Carlo (with Clifton and Miller switching off as the 3rd)...
Bruins DONT need OR WANT Letang, AND the price sucks ass

As for your other trades:
Assuming Erikkson costs a 1st to take (less about what Backes was for the bruins), Zucker will CERTAINLY not get you a 2nd and Virtanen
Dumolin for Juulson and a 2nd is a joke
STL doesnt need or want more Centers so thats wrong
and the only one that might be ok (though I think it sucks) is the oilers one (but thats MY OPINION so up to you)

The rest of it tho besides the oilers one HAS TO be a troll job


It’s not trolling, I’m gonna tell you my thought process on these, but just as an FYI I’m not arguing with you. Sucker was worth Addison, galchenyuk and a 1st and while his price has gone down I would say that virtanen is as valuable as Addison, and the first is still the first you would be removing galchenuk from the deal value wise. Boston I feel would be great on the second pairing and you would just push Carlo down to the third, and Malkin I feel would be the second best center on St. Louis along with the retention. Dump is worth a little less than a first so the second is reasonable and Julsenn was just on waivers. And finally, I had the same thought process for both letang and Malkin, that the players are worth firsts and the retention plus a second is worth another first.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 6:07 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Bruins laugh decline and thank you for the chuckle.

No need for a RD. At all. Even if he was a LD. Would not pay that.
mokumboi and Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 6:59 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Quoting: Gofnut999
Bruins laugh decline and thank you for the chuckle.

No need for a RD. At all. Even if he was a LD. Would not pay that.


While yes, I agree that the bruins don’t need letang, if he becomes available, he will be the best piece on the market to change the bruins from a Stanley cup contender to a Stanley cup favorite.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 8:00 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: Fixitf
While yes, I agree that the bruins don’t need letang, if he becomes available, he will be the best piece on the market to change the bruins from a Stanley cup contender to a Stanley cup favorite.


Wrong 🤷🏻‍♂️

They need an LD1 or a wing that can score. He is neither.
mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 8:15 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Edited Feb. 9, 2021 at 8:25 p.m.
Quoting: Gofnut999
Wrong 🤷🏻‍♂️

They need an LD1 or a wing that can score. He is neither.


Ok, but I have made posts in the past where the bruins receive either zucker (a scoring winger) or dumoulin (a good LHD) and bruins fans always say that they don’t want/need them. I feel like having McAvoy, Letang, and Carlo on the right side would be amazing, and as long as McAvoy and Letang have a defensively capable player on the left side the pairing would be lights out. I do agree that the winger and LHD would be beneficial to the bruins too though.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 8:59 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: Fixitf
Ok, but I have made posts in the past where the bruins receive either zucker (a scoring winger) or dumoulin (a good LHD) and bruins fans always say that they don’t want/need them. I feel like having McAvoy, Letang, and Carlo on the right side would be amazing, and as long as McAvoy and Letang have a defensively capable player on the left side the pairing would be lights out. I do agree that the winger and LHD would be beneficial to the bruins too though.


Dumolin is not a 1.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 8:59 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: Fixitf
Ok, but I have made posts in the past where the bruins receive either zucker (a scoring winger) or dumoulin (a good LHD) and bruins fans always say that they don’t want/need them. I feel like having McAvoy, Letang, and Carlo on the right side would be amazing, and as long as McAvoy and Letang have a defensively capable player on the left side the pairing would be lights out. I do agree that the winger and LHD would be beneficial to the bruins too though.


Dumolin is not a 1. A 15 point d man is not what they need.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.
Feb. 9, 2021 at 11:05 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Edited Feb. 9, 2021 at 11:10 p.m.
Quoting: Gofnut999
Dumolin is not a 1. A 15 point d man is not what they need.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.


Quoting: Gofnut999
Dumolin is not a 1. A 15 point d man is not what they need.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.


Quoting: Gofnut999
Dumolin is not a 1. A 15 point d man is not what they need.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.


Quoting: Gofnut999
Dumolin is not a 1. A 15 point d man is not what they need.

Zucker I’d take for the right price. But not the guy I really want.


In my opinion, Dumoulin is a 1st pairing dman, look at his advanced stats, he is an excellent stay at home defenseman and would play great with McAvoy. He isn’t going to score many goals, but he will allow his defensive partner to play more offensively and help him get some. I know that +/- is an arguable stat, but he has a +54 which has to mean something about his defensive capabilities. I also think that Zucker’s in your face style of play would be perfect for the bruins and would be a great fit for playing with Charlie Coyle.
Feb. 10, 2021 at 12:04 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: Fixitf
In my opinion, Dumoulin is a 1st pairing dman, look at his advanced stats, he is an excellent stay at home defenseman and would play great with McAvoy. He isn’t going to score many goals, but he will allow his defensive partner to play more offensively and help him get some. I know that +/- is an arguable stat, but he has a +54 which has to mean something about his defensive capabilities. I also think that Zucker’s in your face style of play would be perfect for the bruins and would be a great fit for playing with Charlie Coyle.


Agree with Zucker not Dumolin. Not that he isn’t what you say he is, not what they need. They need a 35-40 point 2way d man for LD1. If they can’t get one then go with what they have.
Feb. 10, 2021 at 12:17 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Fixitf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 489
Likes: 26
Quoting: Gofnut999
Agree with Zucker not Dumolin. Not that he isn’t what you say he is, not what they need. They need a 35-40 point 2way d man for LD1. If they can’t get one then go with what they have.


Quoting: Gofnut999
Agree with Zucker not Dumolin. Not that he isn’t what you say he is, not what they need. They need a 35-40 point 2way d man for LD1. If they can’t get one then go with what they have.


I get that. Just wondering, who would you go for that may hit the market to fit that role?
Feb. 10, 2021 at 12:24 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Quoting: Fixitf
I get that. Just wondering, who would you go for that may hit the market to fit that role?


Ekholm
Feb. 10, 2021 at 9:55 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Fixitf
It’s not trolling, I’m gonna tell you my thought process on these, but just as an FYI I’m not arguing with you. Sucker was worth Addison, galchenyuk and a 1st and while his price has gone down I would say that virtanen is as valuable as Addison, and the first is still the first you would be removing galchenuk from the deal value wise. Boston I feel would be great on the second pairing and you would just push Carlo down to the third, and Malkin I feel would be the second best center on St. Louis along with the retention. Dump is worth a little less than a first so the second is reasonable and Julsenn was just on waivers. And finally, I had the same thought process for both letang and Malkin, that the players are worth firsts and the retention plus a second is worth another first.


Listen I wasnt gonna comment on the others cuz I will be the first to admit that I dont know as much about some of those others guys values, but I was just going on the other comments I saw and my previous knowledge of hockey stuff.
In saying that, your analysis is still probably off with most of them, because value isnt the problem with most of them.
And the bruins one is just way off overall: value, team needs, etc...

Thats why I just assumed it was a trolljob. If not im sorry but your trades are just wrong.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll