SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2015 Draft Redo

Created by: Carter_chevy
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 10, 2021
Published: Feb. 10, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
3.
4.
BOS
    Would've traded away
    5.
    BOS
      Would not have signed
      6.
      BOS
      1. Donato, Ryan
      Additional Details:
      Reverse Trade
      Buyouts
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the TOR
      2022
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      2023
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      Logo of the BOS
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$81,500,000$81,284,894$964,222$2,407,500$215,106
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $7,142,857$7,142,857
      LW
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the New York Islanders
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $6,666,667$6,666,667
      RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $6,125,000$6,125,000
      LW
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $6,875,000$6,875,000
      C
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
      RW, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,498,925$1,498,925
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $1,900,000$1,900,000
      LW, C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $2,600,000$2,600,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,600,000$1,600,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,275,000$1,275,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,350,000$1,350,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 3
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Ottawa Senators
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      LD
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $4,900,000$4,900,000
      RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $3,687,500$3,687,500
      LD
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $2,850,000$2,850,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $850,000$850,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,250,000$1,250,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
      RD
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Taxi Squad
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $850,000$850,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Boston Bruins
      $725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      RW
      UFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 11:53 a.m.
      #1
      Grierless Sharks Fan
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 2,935
      Likes: 914
      Coyle would be going back to MIN, right? Also, wasn't Donato 2014 Draft?
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 11:57 a.m.
      #2
      Isles555
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 1,012
      Likes: 589
      The weekly post is here!
      bhavikp27 and Carter_chevy liked this.
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
      #3
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 4,561
      Likes: 1,266
      Quoting: Isles555
      The weekly post is here!


      Yep. Ill debunk it right now dont worry.

      Quoting: goodfella
      Coyle would be going back to MIN, right? Also, wasn't Donato 2014 Draft?


      Yeah but they bruins traded Donato to the wild for Coyle so he is just reverting it

      @Carter_chevy This is totally wrong. Stop doing these, but if you are gonna do them, do it right.
      Zboril and Chabot were equally rated going into the draft. So Zboril was the correct pick at the time. He is also playing well rn so just hold your horses and we will see how he does now that he is getting a chance
      Debrusk was rated HIGHER than Conner. So not only was it the right pick at the time, but debrusk is panning out just fine as a top 6 winger. No problem there.
      The ONLY ONE that makes sense is Barzal over Senyshyn. After picking two players to adress their needs (LHD and LW sniper), it made the most sense to take the BEST PLAYER LEFT ON THE BOARD, especially cuz Barzal was supposed to go top 10. So that is fine, and consequently they would NOT have traded for Coyle, BUT THEY WOULD KEPT KREJCI.
      So doing these is dumb over, but at least do it right
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
      #4
      Serf
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2016
      Posts: 3,417
      Likes: 1,461
      Keep these coming, I have lots of room on my ignore list
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
      #5
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 347
      Likes: 84
      Quoting: sensibleguy
      Keep these coming, I have lots of room on my ignore list


      Ok ill tag you in the next one!
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:35 p.m.
      #6
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 347
      Likes: 84
      Quoting: Silkysmooth42
      Yep. Ill debunk it right now dont worry.



      Yeah but they bruins traded Donato to the wild for Coyle so he is just reverting it

      @Carter_chevy This is totally wrong. Stop doing these, but if you are gonna do them, do it right.
      Zboril and Chabot were equally rated going into the draft. So Zboril was the correct pick at the time. He is also playing well rn so just hold your horses and we will see how he does now that he is getting a chance
      Debrusk was rated HIGHER than Conner. So not only was it the right pick at the time, but debrusk is panning out just fine as a top 6 winger. No problem there.
      The ONLY ONE that makes sense is Barzal over Senyshyn. After picking two players to adress their needs (LHD and LW sniper), it made the most sense to take the BEST PLAYER LEFT ON THE BOARD, especially cuz Barzal was supposed to go top 10. So that is fine, and consequently they would NOT have traded for Coyle, BUT THEY WOULD KEPT KREJCI.
      So doing these is dumb over, but at least do it right


      It doesnt matter where they were projected its how they turned out now
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:52 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 347
      Likes: 84
      Quoting: Isles555
      The weekly post is here!


      yessir!
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:57 p.m.
      #8
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 4,561
      Likes: 1,266
      Quoting: Carter_chevy
      It doesnt matter where they were projected its how they turned out now


      If you are doing how they turned out, then you dont need to revert any trades because its not trying to be realistic anyway so who cares about reverting trades.
      If you wanted to revert trades and make it realistic, thats when you do a REAL redraft where to say what they actually shoulda done
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 1:59 p.m.
      #9
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 347
      Likes: 84
      Quoting: Silkysmooth42
      If you are doing how they turned out, then you dont need to revert any trades because its not trying to be realistic anyway so who cares about reverting trades.
      If you wanted to revert trades and make it realistic, thats when you do a REAL redraft where to say what they actually shoulda done


      I reverted trades to be under the cap
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 3:37 p.m.
      #10
      Bcarlo25
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2018
      Posts: 20,833
      Likes: 6,911
      How original. Never seen one of these before. 🙄

      If this was what it took to get donato off the bruins roster, well worth it.
      Carter_chevy liked this.
      Feb. 10, 2021 at 5:27 p.m.
      #11
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 347
      Likes: 84
      Quoting: Bcarlo25
      How original. Never seen one of these before. 🙄

      If this was what it took to get donato off the bruins roster, well worth it.


      I had fun making it
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll