Quoting: Jah1722
Kerfoot 5v5 corsi is 45%. Hyman’s is 49%. Mikheyev is 44%. Simmonds 48%. Spezza 49%. But please continue to tell me how good they are.
They’re bad.
First off they're middle of the line up players. Compare them to other middle of the line up players.
Secondly:
CF% alone is silly, we all know that. Kerfoot's has been poor this year, but this is the first year he has had a negative CF%Rel in his 4 year career, and the last two years he was above 50%. I'll go with the sample size on this one. He is also getting heavier defensive zone starts being used more in a checking role.
Hyman is 49.7. Statistically his error bars to judge his true talent would like be over 50%. He's doing that with heavy defensive zone starts. So thats good
Simmonds is about our 10th best forward, so he's fine for 10th best forward....
Mikheyev has a 65.3% defensive zone start. He's playing heavy defensive minutes. His CF% unadjusted will look bad, its lazy statistics to not try to analyze that.
Spezza is about our 11th best forward, he's excellent for that. His two way game is slipping, but its fine and he still has offesnive spark.
If you think there are more than maybe 2-3 teams who have a
5th best forward significantly better than Hyman
6th and 7th best forward significantly better than Kerfoot and Thornton
8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th best forwards significantly better than say Mikheyev, Vesey, Simmonds, and Spezza
Then I'd like to see.
They aren't studs, but they are depth players.
Tampa is deeper. Perhaps Colorado or Boston.
But chose your team and compare there 5th-11th forwards. Nobody's 5th-11th forwards are that good...