SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Vancouver Canucks

Created by: tahltan24
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 11, 2021
Published: Feb. 11, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
3.
VAN
  1. 2021 5th round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$77,414,021$1,700,000$4,750,000$4,085,979
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,857,143$2,857,143
C, RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,300,000$4,300,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 11, 2021 at 10:09 p.m.
#1
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,550
Likes: 8,253
I like virtanen but boston won't do that.
Feb. 11, 2021 at 10:18 p.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 6,973
Bruins trade is way way way way off.
Feb. 11, 2021 at 11:37 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 535
JD > Virtanen
Feb. 12, 2021 at 12:14 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,247
Likes: 7,114
I value sissons > gaudette (and I think Preds management would too), so I’d expect it to be more than a one for one. I think VAN would need to add a bit.
Feb. 12, 2021 at 12:18 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 52
Debrusk 82 game average - 25 goals.

Virtanen 82 game average - 14 goals.

Why on earth does Boston do this?

Contending teams don’t trade main roster pieces, especially to downgrade. They trade picks and prospects to upgrade. 2nd or 3rd and low level prospect is more like it.

On top of that look at the wing depth behind Pasta and Marchand.

Pasta - Kase, Smith, Wagner, Studnicka

Marchand - Debrusk, Ritchie, Bjork, Frederic, Blidh.

After your trade look what is left at LW, pretty shallow. Meanwhile where does Virtanen play on RW?

It’s a terrible move for Boston.
Feb. 12, 2021 at 10:55 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SuspendedAgain
Debrusk 82 game average - 25 goals.

Virtanen 82 game average - 14 goals.

Why on earth does Boston do this?

Contending teams don’t trade main roster pieces, especially to downgrade. They trade picks and prospects to upgrade. 2nd or 3rd and low level prospect is more like it.

On top of that look at the wing depth behind Pasta and Marchand.

Pasta - Kase, Smith, Wagner, Studnicka

Marchand - Debrusk, Ritchie, Bjork, Frederic, Blidh.

After your trade look what is left at LW, pretty shallow. Meanwhile where does Virtanen play on RW?

It’s a terrible move for Boston.


Quoting: KennyBoi
JD > Virtanen


Quoting: villenash
I value sissons > gaudette (and I think Preds management would too), so I’d expect it to be more than a one for one. I think VAN would need to add a bit.


Quoting: Jfstompers
I like virtanen but boston won't do that.


Lmao idk why yall are analyzing this so much. Just say LMAO and move on, thats like offering Crosby for Mcdavid, it looks like it could be ok but anyone with half a brain knows its not even close lmao
Feb. 12, 2021 at 11:17 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 52
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao idk why yall are analyzing this so much. Just say LMAO and move on, thats like offering Crosby for Mcdavid, it looks like it could be ok but anyone with half a brain knows its not even close lmao


Because....check out my username. That’s why. Every time i answer along those lines some whiny butthurt twat reports it and i get dinged.
Feb. 12, 2021 at 2:01 p.m.
#8
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,600
Likes: 3,095
No, no, no. If you want us to take on Sutter, you pay us. Lacking a #1C does not automatically mean anyone who plays the position abruptly becomes of value to the Jackets; he's a cap dump here too.
Feb. 12, 2021 at 2:09 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SuspendedAgain
Because....check out my username. That’s why. Every time i answer along those lines some whiny butthurt twat reports it and i get dinged.


Lmao fair, thats why I actually talked to Banks (a moderator) about some of my unfair Warnings I have received in the past. Most rational and kind people on this website know who I am and know that while I will be honest, I am never actually "rude" or an "asshole" (something that cant be said about others that I personally have needed to help report in the past.
Its a shame some of the moderators dont understand the difference between someone going on a logical trade and calling it stupid (rude and just annoying) vs someone going on a trade like this and calling it stupid (true and needs to be said)...
IDK man but i was just saying it cuz its just that bad a trade lmao
Feb. 12, 2021 at 11:25 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 52
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao fair, thats why I actually talked to Banks (a moderator) about some of my unfair Warnings I have received in the past. Most rational and kind people on this website know who I am and know that while I will be honest, I am never actually "rude" or an "asshole" (something that cant be said about others that I personally have needed to help report in the past.
Its a shame some of the moderators dont understand the difference between someone going on a logical trade and calling it stupid (rude and just annoying) vs someone going on a trade like this and calling it stupid (true and needs to be said)...
IDK man but i was just saying it cuz its just that bad a trade lmao



I wasn’t rude. Was sarcastic comical. Seen hundreds of rude insulting posts that go unpunished because the person receiving them isn’t a d bag and handle it themselves or just block the jerk. It’s the whineasses that run to mommy and cry that get posts punished. Half of them don’t deserve it. Common sense is a lost art.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Feb. 13, 2021 at 10:49 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SuspendedAgain
I wasn’t rude. Was sarcastic comical. Seen hundreds of rude insulting posts that go unpunished because the person receiving them isn’t a d bag and handle it themselves or just block the jerk. It’s the whineasses that run to mommy and cry that get posts punished. Half of them don’t deserve it. Common sense is a lost art.


Dont worry I didnt mean you man!! I agree 5 billion percent.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll