Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Created by: SevenLeg
Initial Creation Date: Feb 12, 2021
Published: Feb 12 at 6:36
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
Tryamkin, Nikita1$1,500,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
Hughes, Quinn2$6,000,000
Pettersson, Elias8$10,000,000
Demko, Thatcher2$3,000,000
Gaudette, Adam2$2,000,000
Rafferty, Brogan2$800,000
Bennett, Sam2$2,550,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Edler, Alexander1$3,000,000
Domingue, Louis1$750,000
Hamonic, Travis2$2,000,000
Sutter, Brandon1$1,050,000
Cogliano, Andrew1$1,000,000
Trades
VAN
  1. Kane, Evander
SJS
  1. Juolevi, Olli [RFA Rights]
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. Holtby, Braden
  4. 2021 1st round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Bennett, Sam [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Louis Domingue
CGY
  1. Virtanen, Jake
  2. Chatfield, Jalen [RFA Rights]
VAN
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Motte, Tyler
    Additional Details:
    Protection List :

    Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Kane, Bennett, Gaudette, Pettersson
    Schmidt, Rafferty, Brisebois
    Demko

    Notable Exposures :
    Motte, MacEwen, Roussel, Domingue, Beagle
    Recapture Fees
    • Roberto Luongo: $3,035,212
    DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
    2021
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    2022
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    2023
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES BONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$80,038,546$0$232,500$1,461,454
    Left WingCenterRight Wing
    SJS
    Kane, Evander
    $7,000,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    VAN
    Pettersson, Elias
    $10,000,000
    C
    RFA
    VAN
    Boeser, Brock
    $5,875,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    VAN
    Miller, J.T.
    $5,250,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Horvat, Bo
    $5,500,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Höglander, Nils
    $891,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    VAN
    Roussel, Antoine
    $3,000,000
    LW
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Bennett, Sam
    $2,550,000
    LW, C, RW
    RFA
    VAN
    Gaudette, Adam
    $2,000,000
    C
    RFA
    Cogliano, Andrew
    $1,000,000
    LW
    UFA
    VAN
    MacEwen, Zack
    $825,000
    C, RW
    RFA - 1
    VAN
    Sutter, Brandon
    $1,050,000
    RW, C
    UFA
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    VAN
    Hughes, Quinn
    $6,000,000
    LD
    RFA
    VAN
    Schmidt, Nate
    $5,950,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    VAN
    Demko, Thatcher
    $3,000,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    VAN
    Edler, Alexander
    $3,000,000
    LD
    UFA
    VAN
    Myers, Tyler
    $6,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    VAN
    DiPietro, Michael
    $811,667
    G
    RFA - 1
    VAN
    Tryamkin, Nikita
    $1,500,000
    LD
    RFA
    VAN
    Hamonic, Travis
    $2,000,000
    RD
    UFA
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    VAN
    Beagle, Jay
    $3,000,000
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    VAN
    Ferland, Micheal
    $3,500,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    VAN
    Rafferty, Brogan
    $800,000
    RD
    UFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb 12 at 6:39
    #1
    In need of a laugh
    Joined: Oct 2017
    Posts: 18,325
    Likes: 9,642
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.
    SevenLeg liked this.
    Feb 12 at 6:40
    #2
    Joined: Apr 2019
    Posts: 3,137
    Likes: 1,550
    The 2021 1st is probably gonna be top 5 so there's no way it gets moved. Edler is probably done in Vancouver I could see them signing Savard to play with Hughes. Podkolzin should also be here
    SevenLeg liked this.
    Feb 12 at 6:42
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2019
    Posts: 7,976
    Likes: 5,234
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.


    I'm not that high on Simek tbh. I'm not too familiar with the Sharks, but I think he could be replaced via free agency, despite him having great chemistry with Burns. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Juolevi has to play 18 more games to be eligible.
    Feb 12 at 6:45
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2019
    Posts: 7,976
    Likes: 5,234
    Quoting: TheAlien
    The 2021 1st is probably gonna be top 5 so there's no way it gets moved. Edler is probably done in Vancouver I could see them signing Savard to play with Hughes. Podkolzin should also be here


    Make it a 2022 then, I should have thought of that. I don't know about Savard, he's already over 30 and will likely sign long-term. I'd look for a RHD via trade. I think it's safe to assume that Podkolzin will spend some time in the AHL, just like Denisenko.
    Feb 12 at 6:46
    #5
    In need of a laugh
    Joined: Oct 2017
    Posts: 18,325
    Likes: 9,642
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I'm not that high on Simek tbh. I'm not too familiar with the Sharks, but I think he could be replaced via free agency, despite him having great chemistry with Burns. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Juolevi has to play 18 more games to be eligible.


    Well tbh he's going to play those 18 games this year, but there's no game restriction to get eligible. As long as the player is playing his 3rd pro year, he becomes eligible.

    SJ seems to be high on Simek though.
    Feb 12 at 6:48
    #6
    Joined: Dec 2017
    Posts: 1,466
    Likes: 338
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.


    Sharks best LD is Ferraro.
    ASharksFan and MJC13 liked this.
    Feb 12 at 6:49
    #7
    Joined: Dec 2017
    Posts: 1,466
    Likes: 338
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Well tbh he's going to play those 18 games this year, but there's no game restriction to get eligible. As long as the player is playing his 3rd pro year, he becomes eligible.

    SJ seems to be high on Simek though.


    Simek was great the first year he was here, but he's still coming back from injury sadly. He could get back though and has been improving.
    justaBoss liked this.
    Feb 12 at 6:49
    #8
    In need of a laugh
    Joined: Oct 2017
    Posts: 18,325
    Likes: 9,642
    Quoting: goodfella
    Sharks best LD is Ferraro.


    Ain't something to be happy about, really...
    Feb 12 at 6:50
    #9
    Joined: Dec 2017
    Posts: 1,466
    Likes: 338
    Assuming VAN is one of Kane's 3 teams, this could happen.
    Feb 12 at 6:51
    #10
    Joined: Dec 2017
    Posts: 1,466
    Likes: 338
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Ain't something to be happy about, really...


    Actually, it is. He's underrated. He's playing top line quite a lot lately and doing fairly well. Have you watched any Sharks games this year?
    papishark and MJC13 liked this.
    Feb 12 at 6:53
    #11
    In need of a laugh
    Joined: Oct 2017
    Posts: 18,325
    Likes: 9,642
    Quoting: goodfella
    Actually, it is. He's underrated. He's playing top line quite a lot lately and doing fairly well. Have you watched any Sharks games this year?


    I've wanted to, but it's near impossible as I live in Europe and their games start like 6 AM my time.
    Feb 12 at 6:53
    #12
    Joined: Apr 2019
    Posts: 3,137
    Likes: 1,550
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Make it a 2022 then, I should have thought of that. I don't know about Savard, he's already over 30 and will likely sign long-term. I'd look for a RHD via trade. I think it's safe to assume that Podkolzin will spend some time in the AHL, just like Denisenko.


    Ya I agree the price would have to be right for Savard but I can almost guarantee Podkolzin isn't gonna be sent to the AHL
    Feb 12 at 6:59
    #13
    Tank 4 Yusaku Ando
    Joined: Jan 2020
    Posts: 3,261
    Likes: 1,507
    Gonna be a no thanks from the Sharks. First probably covers Eriksson but Juolevi and Holtby aren't what the doctor ordered in both need and value if we're shipping out Kane as well.
    ASharksFan liked this.
    Feb 12 at 7:06
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Joined: Feb 2019
    Posts: 7,976
    Likes: 5,234
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Gonna be a no thanks from the Sharks. First probably covers Eriksson but Juolevi and Holtby aren't what the doctor ordered in both need and value if we're shipping out Kane as well.


    I think shipping out Kane is what's best going forward. The team is going nowhere with these massive contracts, and Kane most be the most moveable but has a 28-teams no trade list. The options are limited, Vancouver could be one of three destinations, Kane being from there. After Eriksson expires this year, you've got a 1st, a young dman with top 4 potential & an improvement over Jones in net that could be re-signed cheaper. This is just my personal view.
    RawZuccSauce420 liked this.
    Feb 12 at 7:11
    #15
    Joined: Aug 2019
    Posts: 6,378
    Likes: 2,216
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Ain't something to be happy about, really...


    Ferraro is fantastic. I have no issue with him being the best LHD. It would be awesome if Vlasic wasnt dog**** but cant wish for the impossible
    Feb 12 at 7:15
    #16
    Joined: Dec 2017
    Posts: 1,466
    Likes: 338
    Quoting: justaBoss
    I've wanted to, but it's near impossible as I live in Europe and their games start like 6 AM my time.


    I wouldn't get up at 6am to watch Sharks games and I'm in their time zone. I'm too old.
    SevenLeg and justaBoss liked this.
    Feb 12 at 7:43
    #17
    Tank 4 Yusaku Ando
    Joined: Jan 2020
    Posts: 3,261
    Likes: 1,507
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I think shipping out Kane is what's best going forward. The team is going nowhere with these massive contracts, and Kane most be the most moveable but has a 28-teams no trade list. The options are limited, Vancouver could be one of three destinations, Kane being from there. After Eriksson expires this year, you've got a 1st, a young dman with top 4 potential & an improvement over Jones in net that could be re-signed cheaper. This is just my personal view.


    You have some decent points here. I agree the team has a stupid amount of bad contracts and Kane is probably one of the more moveable assets. Vancouver could very well be one of the teams on his trade list. We all know Eriksson is...well...Eriksson. Not much to say there but like I mentioned earlier the first probably covers the cap dump.

    I just don't really know how to feel about Juolevi and Holtby. I know Juolevi is starting to come around but I'm not sure he's what we need really. I like him but I can't say I see him being anything more than a decent 2nd pair defensman. I could be wrong there but that's just my outlook at this stage. Holtby is okay as well but feels redundant if we don't find a way to trade or buyout Jones.

    At the end of the day getting rid of Kane just feels silly because of all the overpaid contracts on this team, his is probably the least harmful at the moment. Not a bad trade but it's also not one which turns the needle a lot.
    SevenLeg liked this.
    Feb 12 at 8:09
    #18
    Hockey Fan13
    Joined: Oct 2019
    Posts: 3,115
    Likes: 1,941
    I think if the Sharks came to the realization that they need big changes then they consider this, but I would like to see the deal changed up to have Vancouver retain some money here even money in and out. So if Canucks retained roughly 3 million I think it's closer also I feel like Canucks would lottery protect the 1st rounder.
    Not sure Sharks would mind losing Simek in expansion at this point.
    SevenLeg liked this.
    Feb 12 at 8:18
    #19
    SJSharksNews
    Joined: Jan 2021
    Posts: 17
    Likes: 9
    As a Sharks Fan I want absolutely no part of that deal at all
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Remove Option
    Submit Poll