SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Carolina Hurricanes

CARCBJ Discussion

Feb. 15, 2021 at 7:41 p.m.
#1
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
I don’t understand how the Teuvo goal was disallowed for offsides. Foegele was offsides, but all 5 players changed - essentially tagging up.

Anyone understand this?
Feb. 15, 2021 at 7:44 p.m.
#2
sbinalla
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 357
do this in forums
Feb. 15, 2021 at 7:49 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
Forums are terrible

Quoting: maplelaughs2297
do this in forums
Feb. 15, 2021 at 8:00 p.m.
#4
Jimmy Stu
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 540
never saw it but depends if Foegele was completely off the ice upon entry. Even if he 'in the process' or if It's too close for the ref to call they will blow it down
Feb. 15, 2021 at 8:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
30+ seconds of play went on, long enough for all 5 Canes to change.

Quoting: CMac66
never saw it but depends if Foegele was completely off the ice upon entry. Even if he 'in the process' or if It's too close for the ref to call they will blow it down
Feb. 15, 2021 at 8:52 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Caniac555
30+ seconds of play went on, long enough for all 5 Canes to change.


The puck was touched in an offside position thus being offsides. Yes it was dumped in but the player touched the puck when 13 was already offsides to dump it.
Feb. 15, 2021 at 8:57 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
Maybe my point isn’t clear. Offside occurred while 37, 11, 13, and two defensive players were on the ice. All 5 players changed, crossed back into the neutral zone and 5 new players came onto the ice. Isn’t that touching up, or going back on sides?

Quoting: Ajp_18
The puck was touched in an offside position thus being offsides. Yes it was dumped in but the player touched the puck when 13 was already offsides to dump it.
Feb. 15, 2021 at 9:17 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Caniac555
Maybe my point isn’t clear. Offside occurred while 37, 11, 13, and two defensive players were on the ice. All 5 players changed, crossed back into the neutral zone and 5 new players came onto the ice. Isn’t that touching up, or going back on sides?


No, there was no chance to touch up, the whistle should have been immediate when 37 touched the puck with 13 in a offsides position. If 37 wouldn’t have touched it in the offsides position and dumbed it on the blue line it wouldn’t have been offsides.

Essentially the linesman missed would would have been an immediate offsides call vs what you are thinking if as a delayed offsides that a player is in a offsides position and the puck gets dumped in and tags up this negating the offsides.
Feb. 15, 2021 at 9:41 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,720
Likes: 3,588
You mean 37 carrying the puck into the zone instead of dumping it in. If that’s the case then I understand.

Quoting: Ajp_18
No, there was no chance to touch up, the whistle should have been immediate when 37 touched the puck with 13 in a offsides position. If 37 wouldn’t have touched it in the offsides position and dumbed it on the blue line it wouldn’t have been offsides.

Essentially the linesman missed would would have been an immediate offsides call vs what you are thinking if as a delayed offsides that a player is in a offsides position and the puck gets dumped in and tags up this negating the offsides.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll