SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tank for 2022

Created by: Rob32sjsharks
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2021
Published: Feb. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
2022 draft is stacked so I say we ramp up our rebuild and go all in!
Hertl trade will be devastating.
Meir trade could turn ugly if he blows up with The oilers.
I don’t love either of these trades, but they give us the assets to restore our prospect pool and depth.
This jumpstarts our rebuild by rocketing our prospect talent pool to top 10 in the nhl. And gives us a pipeline of talent to take over for the aging overpriced vets and will open a new decade long playoff contention window from 25-35
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$786,000
3$786,000
3$786,000
3$786,000
2$786,000
3$786,000
3$786,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$955,000
2$785,000
2$2,785,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$825,000
2$825,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Neal, James
  2. Samorukov, Dmitri
  3. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Meier, Timo
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Oilers give up a lot to dump Neil and get a top 6 power forward under 25 signed to a good deal. In Meir. I think it’s fair.
2.
SJS
  1. Strome, Ryan
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (BUF)
  3. 2022 1st round pick (NYR)
3.
SJS
    Seattle expansion draft
    4.
    SJS
    1. 2022 2nd round pick (TBL)
    2. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    2022
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MIN
    2023
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$54,652,029$0$857,500$26,847,971
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,108,696$2,108,696
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $750,000$750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,785,000$2,785,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $955,000$955,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $785,000$785,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $900,000$900,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,280,000$5,280,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $796,667$796,667
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $750,000$750,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $750,000$750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $725,000$725,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 3:07 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 9,527
    Likes: 8,968
    Not gonna talk much about value (if anything you might be undervaluing which is kinda surprising, especially the EDM deal considering you’re taking Neal) but one comment I wanna make—don’t expect 3 1sts in 2022 (likely two in the 20s and a top 8) plus a top 10 pick in 2021 to immediately spike you up to a top 10 prospect pool, you really have to hit on your 2nds/3rds, and if you’re really lucky some later picks, to supplement a prospect pool like that, especially considering that despite an above average draft this year (I thought Wiesblatt might’ve been a bit of a stretch with Peterka, Khusnutdinov, Gunler, Wallinder, etc. still on the board but I thought Gushchin was great at 72 and Bordeleau was solid at 38 too, although again Gunler) the Sharks still have one of the worst prospect pools in the league, probably still 30th if we’re being honest, nothing’s worse than Pittsburgh but the Sharks are pretty close. Unless they get lottery picks both years and add like Lambert+Edvinsson to their pipeline it’ll take a little longer to turn around (for example prior to the 2020 draft where I thought they blew it out of the park, I probably wouldn’t have had Detroit as a top 10 prospect pool despite having the second best D prospect in the league in Seider and another 6 or 7 top 40 picks, including Zadina). Patience is gonna be a virtue for a San Jose rebuild, the EK65/Burns/Vlasic/Jones contracts and even Couture/Kane to a lesser extent are absolutely brutal to the point of preventing the team from improving until they’re nearly done, you’re likely looking at 4 or 5 years of mediocrity if you pursue a rebuild now (which is of course better than 6+ years if you don’t lol), but on the bright side you’ll likely have at least 3 top 10 picks and probably 7 or 8 1sts in the next 4 drafts if you’re smart about it.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 4:16 a.m.
    #2
    Hockey Fan13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2019
    Posts: 3,916
    Likes: 2,487
    I think the returns should be better than this, I think you are error on the side of caution. PS what did labanc do to deserve that?
    HelmutCool liked this.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 5:34 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 5,214
    Likes: 2,867
    Nothing wrong here per se. I can't really vouch for EDM, OTT or NYR regarding whether they would want to make those deals in the first place, but I think you're underselling on all of them. Especially the oilers trade.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 10:53 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 11,155
    Likes: 4,640
    Quoting: Alfie11
    Not gonna talk much about value (if anything you might be undervaluing which is kinda surprising, especially the EDM deal considering you’re taking Neal) but one comment I wanna make—don’t expect 3 1sts in 2022 (likely two in the 20s and a top 8) plus a top 10 pick in 2021 to immediately spike you up to a top 10 prospect pool, you really have to hit on your 2nds/3rds, and if you’re really lucky some later picks, to supplement a prospect pool like that, especially considering that despite an above average draft this year (I thought Wiesblatt might’ve been a bit of a stretch with Peterka, Khusnutdinov, Gunler, Wallinder, etc. still on the board but I thought Gushchin was great at 72 and Bordeleau was solid at 38 too, although again Gunler) the Sharks still have one of the worst prospect pools in the league, probably still 30th if we’re being honest, nothing’s worse than Pittsburgh but the Sharks are pretty close. Unless they get lottery picks both years and add like Lambert+Edvinsson to their pipeline it’ll take a little longer to turn around (for example prior to the 2020 draft where I thought they blew it out of the park, I probably wouldn’t have had Detroit as a top 10 prospect pool despite having the second best D prospect in the league in Seider and another 6 or 7 top 40 picks, including Zadina). Patience is gonna be a virtue for a San Jose rebuild, the EK65/Burns/Vlasic/Jones contracts and even Couture/Kane to a lesser extent are absolutely brutal to the point of preventing the team from improving until they’re nearly done, you’re likely looking at 4 or 5 years of mediocrity if you pursue a rebuild now (which is of course better than 6+ years if you don’t lol), but on the bright side you’ll likely have at least 3 top 10 picks and probably 7 or 8 1sts in the next 4 drafts if you’re smart about it.


    I’m not disagreeing with you, most have the sharks prospect pool at 26th lots of mediocre talent/ mid level pool but very few if any elite prospects. Tanking and getting 4 picks in the first 4 in a super deep super talented draft will help, if you notice I said out next playoff window would be 2025/26 that’s 5 years from now and cup contention a few years later. I expect this to take time.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 10:56 a.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 11,155
    Likes: 4,640
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Nothing wrong here per se. I can't really vouch for EDM, OTT or NYR regarding whether they would want to make those deals in the first place, but I think you're underselling on all of them. Especially the oilers trade.

    I am underselling but with the whole Covid thing stagnating the markets is making for an very bullish market, hoping for better return but I’d be ok with these returns,
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 10:57 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 11,155
    Likes: 4,640
    Quoting: OutCold13
    I think the returns should be better than this, I think you are error on the side of caution. PS what did labanc do to deserve that?


    Just think Wilson overpaid him and he won’t live up to the contract, I like him at 3.2/3.3 a year not 4.7
    OutCold13 liked this.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 11:43 a.m.
    #7
    Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 3,562
    Likes: 1,592
    I wanted Ottawa to go after Leblanc during the off-season but I agree with you, the odds of him living up to that new contract are slim.
    For $5.875M Ottawa could nab a better UFA on a 2 or 3 year deal.
    Feb. 17, 2021 at 12:15 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 11,155
    Likes: 4,640
    Quoting: TCMonkey
    I wanted Ottawa to go after Leblanc during the off-season but I agree with you, the odds of him living up to that new contract are slim.
    For $5.875M Ottawa could nab a better UFA on a 2 or 3 year deal.


    Your about 1.125 mil off he is at 4.75 a year.
    Feb. 20, 2021 at 1:38 p.m.
    #9
    Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 3,562
    Likes: 1,592
    Edited Feb. 20, 2021 at 1:44 p.m.
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    Your about 1.125 mil off he is at 4.75 a year.


    Nope. I'm bang on. Labanc is owed $5.875M in REAL money for both of his final seasons. Since CAP is not a concern for Ottawa (especially the next two years) they would be looking at how they could spend that $5.875 and NOT give up any picks. It's an easy NO when you think of it that way.
    Feb. 20, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
    #10
    Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2016
    Posts: 3,562
    Likes: 1,592
    And that money would be far better spent on a defensemen.
    Feb. 20, 2021 at 4:16 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 11,155
    Likes: 4,640
    Quoting: TCMonkey
    Nope. I'm bang on. Labanc is owed $5.875M in REAL money for both of his final seasons. Since CAP is not a concern for Ottawa (especially the next two years) they would be looking at how they could spend that $5.875 and NOT give up any picks. It's an easy NO when you think of it that way.


    Ok that fair.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll