SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3rd line

Created by: pharrow
Team: 2020-21 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2021
Published: Feb. 21, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
It's really a great opportunity to pick up a 3C that doesn't cost us anything.
He's still young. an easy 20 goal guy. Just what the 3rd line needs at center.
Then they can concentrate on what to do at 3RW, maybe bring in Poulin and go with it.
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Henrique, Adam
Additional Details:
waivers
ANA
2.
PIT
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Matheson has been playing so well it's unreal.
But the penguins need cap space to fix their 3rd line.
This trade is done right before Dumo comes off LTIR.
1 of 2 teams.
DET or NJ
DET has no left defense
Djoos comes back but he sucks.
Dekyser is always hurt.
Everyone else is a UFA.
Spare me the "but we got young guys" you been harping that for years. It ain't happening.
He fills a need, and he's been a really solid player. He's playing 24 mins a night for the penguins lights out.

The other team is NJ.
Murray is a UFA. You got Smith and Butcher as your only LD next year. That isn't exactly inspiring.
You get a solid Dman here for a pick.
It's a solid move for either team.
Don't worry about the opinions of people who don't watch the games. Matheson's play has been unreal good. Matheson-Marino pairing is probably the penguins best pairing at the moment.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,201,425$0$1,062,500$8,298,575
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$792,500$792,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$733,333$733,333 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$733,333$733,333 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,200,000$1,200,000 ($125,000$125K$125,000$125K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 21, 2021 at 2:15 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Maybe Henrique for Matheson type deal
pharrow and BStinson liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 2:17 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Maybe Henrique for Matheson type deal


I looked at it but ANA has pretty solid depth at LD. I don't think they want to pay almost 5 mil for a 3rd pairing there.
Need a 3rd team in need of defense. It's not like there are not options there.
mhockey91 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 2:20 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
I looked at it but ANA has pretty solid depth at LD. I don't think they want to pay almost 5 mil for a 3rd pairing there.
Need a 3rd team in need of defense. It's not like there are not options there.


Yup agreed on that. They got Lindholm/Fowler on the left side. I think the trade value is good but fit isn’t
Feb. 21, 2021 at 2:24 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: mhockey91
Yup agreed on that. They got Lindholm/Fowler on the left side. I think the trade value is good but fit isn’t


I think at the end of the day, with the way Matheson is playing, a team like DET or NJ has to be looking at him saying, we can get a solid young 2LD for a 2nd and take it and run.

These teams have nothing on their blueline going forward, especially DET.
mhockey91 liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 5:22 a.m.
#5
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,035
Likes: 5,413
Wings pass, penguins add massive amounts for us to take that contract. We certainly aren't paying a pick to take him. Yzerman has stated on repeat we aren't trading picks. This is not the direction the red wings are going. Penguins add a massive piece/pick and take back a bad contract otherwise this is a no
RedWing9119 and BStinson liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 5:55 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 406
Likes: 66
I agree that Matheson plays very good. So why are you trading him? Teams are cautious about him, it would be easier to trade away Pettersson.
RedWing9119 and buffbry liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:21 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: mike384
I agree that Matheson plays very good. So why are you trading him? Teams are cautious about him, it would be easier to trade away Pettersson.


because it creates more cap space and it makes for better cap structure on the team.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:25 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass, penguins add massive amounts for us to take that contract. We certainly aren't paying a pick to take him. Yzerman has stated on repeat we aren't trading picks. This is not the direction the red wings are going. Penguins add a massive piece/pick and take back a bad contract otherwise this is a no


dude with the way Matheson is playing you'll be paying to take him. That ain't no lie.

DET isn't in a good position as far as team structure is concerned. You don't have a defense. Like none. You aren't really appealing for players to come play there. So your choices will be to massively overpay someone to come play there, or to have swiss cheese defense like permanently, which impedes the growth of the youth on the team.

You need to be more realistic on your situation. As you still need to field a team. Having 2 guys under control next year isn't helping you. It's not like your going to go out and find 5 quality defensemen, and you will need 5 because Dekyser is always hurt.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 8:14 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
laugh laugh Matheson isn't returning no 2nd round pick, You could put him on waivers today and no team is claiming him with that horrendous contract.
buffbry liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 8:15 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
laugh laugh Matheson isn't returning no 2nd round pick, You could put him on waivers today and no team is claiming him with that horrendous contract.


from someone who didn't watch a single game.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 8:18 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: pharrow
from someone who didn't watch a single game.


Dude i've watched him play tons here in Florida, Know more about the guy then you do. He carries a $4,875,000 cap hit for 5 more seasons after this there's noway he's worth that contract.
BStinson liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 10:01 a.m.
#12
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 9,035
Likes: 5,413
Quoting: pharrow
dude with the way Matheson is playing you'll be paying to take him. That ain't no lie.

DET isn't in a good position as far as team structure is concerned. You don't have a defense. Like none. You aren't really appealing for players to come play there. So your choices will be to massively overpay someone to come play there, or to have swiss cheese defense like permanently, which impedes the growth of the youth on the team.

You need to be more realistic on your situation. As you still need to field a team. Having 2 guys under control next year isn't helping you. It's not like your going to go out and find 5 quality defensemen, and you will need 5 because Dekyser is always hurt.


You won't get a 2nd for him with that contract sorry bud
BStinson liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 10:11 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: pharrow
from someone who didn't watch a single game.


This is ironic coming from someone who says Djoos sucks. He’s been actually pretty good. You want Matheson gone I’d wager you’d have to pay and not the other way around. You’re falling into a recency bias and sample size matters (8).
buffbry liked this.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:18 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: BStinson
This is ironic coming from someone who says Djoos sucks. He’s been actually pretty good. You want Matheson gone I’d wager you’d have to pay and not the other way around. You’re falling into a recency bias and sample size matters (8).


Honestly, I don't think you can "fake" being a good defenseman on the ice for 24 minutes a game repeatedly.
Call it what you will, but that's a lot of ice time to be "hiding" your bad play.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:20 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Dude i've watched him play tons here in Florida, Know more about the guy then you do. He carries a $4,875,000 cap hit for 5 more seasons after this there's noway he's worth that contract.


If you watched him in FL than you know he earned that contract playing well in FL till the system and coach changed and everyone went crying about him playing a physical style of hockey.
You know what kind of defenseman he can be. Because you saw it first hand.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: pharrow
Honestly, I don't think you can "fake" being a good defenseman on the ice for 24 minutes a game repeatedly.
Call it what you will, but that's a lot of ice time to be "hiding" your bad play.

Jack Johnson did it multiple times too and he’s been trash for a long time. All I’m saying is that it’s going to take a much longer sample size to qualm anyone’s doubts about a player especially factoring in his contract in this flat cap/pandemic economy. For instance, if a team wanted to acquire a player this last offseason they could’ve used a third rounder to get Schmidt or 2x seconds to get Toews and I’d wager you’d agree both are superior players. That’s the cost of moving cap now without any coming back.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 7:38 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: BStinson
Jack Johnson did it multiple times too and he’s been trash for a long time. All I’m saying is that it’s going to take a much longer sample size to qualm anyone’s doubts about a player especially factoring in his contract in this flat cap/pandemic economy. For instance, if a team wanted to acquire a player this last offseason they could’ve used a third rounder to get Schmidt or 2x seconds to get Toews and I’d wager you’d agree both are superior players. That’s the cost of moving cap now without any coming back.


Everyone wants to say these things.
But hell they moved Guddy with a small improved sample size no problem to ANA, who then sent him to OTT....no problem at all.

Matheson is playing much much much better than Guddy ever did. And while I'll agree 1 or 2 games ain't going to do it, It's not 1 or 2 games at this point...and it doesn't happen till Dumo comes back off IR.
So you are looking at a fairly large sample size of games.
Lets be honest about the teams I picked too. DET, has no defensemen. Like none. 1 guy coming back next year, at least one who isn't always on IR like every damn year.
NJ is no better.
You really think DET is going to find 5 defensemen in FA next year. Because really that's their future. They are gonna over pay every single one of those and not end up with the best talent to begin with.
At least they get a solid guy at a close to reasonable cost here. 4.8 is not a huge over pay for a 2LD. They go in the 4-5 range. Even on the penguins, MP got 4, Marino got 4.4.
It's not some huge overpay. The thing people don't like is the length. But that's not a reason to not take a guy who plays well and is only 26 years old. It's not like he's 32 on that thing.
You are talking about a league so deprived of defensive help that Jack Johnson keeps getting contracts. What does that tell you about their value.
Feb. 21, 2021 at 8:01 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: pharrow
Everyone wants to say these things.
But hell they moved Guddy with a small improved sample size no problem to ANA, who then sent him to OTT....no problem at all.

Matheson is playing much much much better than Guddy ever did. And while I'll agree 1 or 2 games ain't going to do it, It's not 1 or 2 games at this point...and it doesn't happen till Dumo comes back off IR.
So you are looking at a fairly large sample size of games.
Lets be honest about the teams I picked too. DET, has no defensemen. Like none. 1 guy coming back next year, at least one who isn't always on IR like every damn year.
NJ is no better.
You really think DET is going to find 5 defensemen in FA next year. Because really that's their future. They are gonna over pay every single one of those and not end up with the best talent to begin with.
At least they get a solid guy at a close to reasonable cost here. 4.8 is not a huge over pay for a 2LD. They go in the 4-5 range. Even on the penguins, MP got 4, Marino got 4.4.
It's not some huge overpay. The thing people don't like is the length. But that's not a reason to not take a guy who plays well and is only 26 years old. It's not like he's 32 on that thing.
You are talking about a league so deprived of defensive help that Jack Johnson keeps getting contracts. What does that tell you about their value.

8 games isn’t a sufficient sample size though and hopefully he continues his good play but it’s not guaranteed. Yes, Johnson was given a contract by Rutherford and then Gorton (only a million) but that’s not MM’s contract. Detroit can also acquire FAs and saying no one wants to go there is just pure speculation.

I’m not sure where you got 5 from. Hronek, Seider, and Stetcher are locks. Djoos has played good for us and is an RFA so there’s 4. I’d love to bring Merrill back too but he’s a FA and DDK needs to stay healthy.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll