SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines Next Game

Created by: Beetlejuice
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 9, 2021
Published: Feb. 24, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$53,614,647$1,090,244$2,715,000$27,885,353

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$742,500$742,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 24, 2021 at 12:37 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Its tough for me at this point, because our 4th line looked so good today with a full 12 forwards, they led to several powerplays and several icings and as a result a few goals, but there arent any defensemen that are playing particularly poorly and I want Beaudin to get minutes. Its tough to balance that. Zadorov has looked pretty good these past few games and hes had several good chances in the offensive zone along with not making any bad turnovers and being pretty good in his own zone. There are just moments where we get outplayed as a team in both scenarios and I genuinely can't tell whether 11F7D or 12F6D is better for us.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll