SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Glendening Namestnikov

Created by: MatthewsFan
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 24, 2021
Published: Feb. 24, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DET
  1. Hirvonen, Roni [Reserve List]
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$80,224,741$0$0$1,275,259

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$900,000$900,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$874,125$874,125
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000 ($175,000$175K$175,000$175K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,050,000$1,050,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:27 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 918
Overpay
LGuy54 liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 11,990
Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
Overpay


😂 don’t see that often, k what’s the price?
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:31 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
that's nice and awful for the leafs. Two terrible 4th liners that are worse than everything the leafs have used on the 4th line this year for good assets
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:33 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 918
Quoting: LeafsfanMathews
😂 don’t see that often, k what’s the price?


Not sure. But I really like Hirvonen as a prospect. Maybe a 2nd round pick and a lower graded prospect?
MatthewsFan liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:35 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 11,990
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
that's nice and awful for the leafs. Two terrible 4th liners that are worse than everything the leafs have used on the 4th line this year for good assets


That are years away. Glendening and Namestnikov are not terrible 4th line players. Vlad can play in the top 9 and Luke is a very good C man. Overpay probably but just gaging their value with some retention
aedoran liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:35 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
Not sure. But I really like Hirvonen as a prospect. Maybe a 2nd round pick and a lower graded prospect?


but neither of these players from detroit are worth anything close to that
Florida_Man_Maroon liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:36 p.m.
#7
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 8,419
You could do alot worse than Namestnikov but as much as I like glenny hes not a 3rd line player. Hes a depth guy at best.
aedoran liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:38 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: LeafsfanMathews
That are years away. Glendening and Namestnikov are not terrible 4th line players. Vlad can play in the top 9 and Luke is a very good C man. Overpay probably but just gaging their value with some retention


no, they are terrible 4th liners. they are flat out awful players who cant defend or score enough to compensate for being awful in their own end and would make the leafs bottom 6 worse. Seriously, they literally bleed shots and chances against at below replacement levels.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:41 p.m.
#9
themostleaf33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 554
Yeah overpay imo. Boyd is better then Glendening and Namestnikov doesn't bring anything that Mikheyev already has
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:45 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 11,990
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
no, they are terrible 4th liners. they are flat out awful players who cant defend or score enough to compensate for being awful in their own end and would make the leafs bottom 6 worse. Seriously, they literally bleed shots and chances against at below replacement levels.


Do yourself a favour and watch other teams than just Toronto. Namestnikov would rank 5th in ixG on the Leafs, just behind JT;
4th in isF just behind Marner. And Glendening is a faceoff machine and would be a great 3C
buffbry, RedWing9119, aedoran and 2 others liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:49 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 11,990
Quoting: themostleaf33
Yeah overpay imo. Boyd is better then Glendening and Namestnikov doesn't bring anything that Mikheyev already has


Well Namestnikov can finish so I think he could bring that. Also just tired of all the NSH trades. Was looking for something different
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:49 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: LeafsfanMathews
Do yourself a favour and watch other teams than just Toronto. Namestnikov would rank 5th in ixG on the Leafs, just behind JT;
4th in isF just behind Marner. And Glendening is a faceoff machine and would be a great 3C


so yourself a favour and watch them yourself. using 2 cherry picked stats from a shortened season is an awful way to evaluate a player who has been bad defensively his entire career and only generates offence when he is given ice time, linemates and powerplay time way above his station.
And glendening can literally do nothing except faceoffs, he is legitimatly one of the worst players in the NHL. He's a terrible 4th line C on the redwings and he'd been an even worse one on the leafs.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:51 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 11,990
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
so yourself a favour and watch them yourself. using 2 cherry picked stats from a shortened season is an awful way to evaluate a player who has been bad defensively his entire career and only generates offence when he is given ice time, linemates and powerplay time way above his station.
And glendening can literally do nothing except faceoffs, he is legitimatly one of the worst players in the NHL. He's a terrible 4th line C on the redwings and he'd been an even worse one on the leafs.


I do watch watch other games other than the Leafs. Talking hockey with you is like banging my head against a wall. Stupid casual fans 🤦‍♂️
Feb. 24, 2021 at 6:56 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: LeafsfanMathews
I do watch watch other games other than the Leafs. Talking hockey with you is like banging my head against a wall. Stupid casual fans 🤦‍♂️


ah yes, you've watched them and you think they are good so obviously other people couldnt have watched them. If I had asked you if you had watched them first do i get dibs on that BS and does it make me watching them more important and correct?
Such a lazy, nonsensical argument that only people who have nothing else to go on use.

Im not even going to point out how friggen hilarious it is that someone who thinks Glendening would be a good 3c because he "watched the games" is calling people casual fans. That's like someone watching Fraser MacLaren saying he'd be a good 3LW because he skates good in a straight line
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,117
Likes: 12,278
Quoting: LeafsfanMathews
That are years away. Glendening and Namestnikov are not terrible 4th line players. Vlad can play in the top 9 and Luke is a very good C man. Overpay probably but just gaging their value with some retention


Glendening is leading the league in face off winning %.
MatthewsFan liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: aedoran
Glendening is leading the league in face off winning %.


and that's the prime example of just how unimportant faceoffs are. If he is that good at faceoffs, and STILL that bad at everything else that all his numbers have stink lines coming off em, how big of a liability is he when he loses a draw?
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:43 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,117
Likes: 12,278
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
and that's the prime example of just how unimportant faceoffs are. If he is that good at faceoffs, and STILL that bad at everything else that all his numbers have stink lines coming off em, how big of a liability is he when he loses a draw?


Do you know how stupid you sound anybody who knows anything about hockey will disagree.
MatthewsFan liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:49 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: aedoran
Do you know how stupid you sound anybody who knows anything about hockey will disagree.


do you know how stupid you sound to anyone who has actually looked into faceoffs? Anyone who knows anything about hockey would agree. If you cannot hold possession of the puck after a faceoff win, then the win is pointless. Glendening is so bad that he could win 99.99% of his faceoffs and still be a terrible hockey player because faceoffs are less than 1% of the game.
If they were important he'd actually have good shot and chance suppression numbers, but he doesnt. All his numbers are a train wreck.
Being good at faceoffs is like having a hard shot, but if you cant hit the net when you shoot it having a hard shot is pretty pointless. Do you want to be able to shoot the puck really hard? sure, but not near as much as you want to be able to control the shot.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:56 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,117
Likes: 12,278
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
do you know how stupid you sound to anyone who has actually looked into faceoffs? Anyone who knows anything about hockey would agree. If you cannot hold possession of the puck after a faceoff win, then the win is pointless. Glendening is so bad that he could win 99.99% of his faceoffs and still be a terrible hockey player because faceoffs are less than 1% of the game.
If they were important he'd actually have good shot and chance suppression numbers, but he doesnt. All his numbers are a train wreck.
Being good at faceoffs is like having a hard shot, but if you cant hit the net when you shoot it having a hard shot is pretty pointless. Do you want to be able to shoot the puck really hard? sure, but not near as much as you want to be able to control the shot.


Do you have any thing to back that up?
Feb. 24, 2021 at 7:58 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: aedoran
Do you have any thing to back that up?


i mean, you can just look up his possession numbers and it's right there. But here's a piece on it
https://canucksarmy.com/2019/01/09/do-faceoffs-really-make-a-difference/
Feb. 24, 2021 at 8:01 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,117
Likes: 12,278
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
i mean, you can just look up his possession numbers and it's right there. But here's a piece on it
https://canucksarmy.com/2019/01/09/do-faceoffs-really-make-a-difference/


You did this and is it recognized by the NHL or and other league? Just because you found it on the internet doesn't mean its true.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 8:03 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: aedoran
You did this and its it recognized by the NHL?


what? what does that even mean recognised by the NHL? Do they put out a dictionary of recognised hockey takes ever year?
Feb. 24, 2021 at 8:11 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,117
Likes: 12,278
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
what? what does that even mean recognised by the NHL? Do they put out a dictionary of recognised hockey takes ever year?


That is true but the NHL will put its stamp on research that they feel is important. Changing the belief that face-offs are really not important as once thought would be pretty big.

Off topic real quick You aren't the person who tried to convince me that elite positioning was a real thing?
Feb. 24, 2021 at 8:14 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,125
Likes: 7,496
Quoting: aedoran
That is true but the NHL will put its stamp on research that they feel is important. Changing the belief that face-offs are really not important as once thought would be pretty big.

Off topic real quick You aren't the person who tried to convince me that elite positioning was a real thing?


I have never seen any form of the NHL putting a stamp on research like this, they dont have any sort of method to do that unless you mean Jim hughson prattling on about stuff that he thinks is important during game play.
And no, i have never even heard of elite positioning, whatever the hell that is
aedoran liked this.
Feb. 24, 2021 at 9:21 p.m.
#25
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 8,419
Quoting: aedoran
That is true but the NHL will put its stamp on research that they feel is important. Changing the belief that face-offs are really not important as once thought would be pretty big.

Off topic real quick You aren't the person who tried to convince me that elite positioning was a real thing?


Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience--Mark Twain.......f that dude
aedoran liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll