SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revised bad contract swaps with Sabres

Created by: SjSharks19
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 25, 2021
Published: Feb. 25, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
As a Sharks fan, I would prefer taking Ristolainen with no salary retained instead of Okposo but Buffalo is almost guaranteed to reject that.
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$72,421,667$0$510,000$9,078,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$735,000$735,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,800,000$4,800,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 25, 2021 at 10:39 p.m.
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,167
Likes: 8,984
Buffalo is almost guaranteed to reject this, Skinner has the most potential of all of them, Vlasic is toast
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:28 p.m.
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,057
Likes: 12,816
Quoting: Shibbal18
Buffalo is almost guaranteed to reject this, Skinner has the most potential of all of them, Vlasic is toast


Can everyone (including non sharks fans and sharks fans) stop trading Vlasic.

He’s quite literally the definition of an immovable object.

It’s just everyday there’s a sharks post with some dumb trades or moves always involving Vlasic.

Vlasic is worse then skinner and his contract is buyout proof. Only a retiring move from Vlasic will rid us of that money hole.
Shibbal18 and Borocop liked this.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Remove Okposo's retention and maybe this is fairish. Highly doubt it ever happens but yeah.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:40 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 35
Likes: 3
Quoting: yikes
Can everyone (including non sharks fans and sharks fans) stop trading Vlasic.

He’s quite literally the definition of an immovable object.

It’s just everyday there’s a sharks post with some dumb trades or moves always involving Vlasic.

Vlasic is worse then skinner and his contract is buyout proof. Only a retiring move from Vlasic will rid us of that money hole.


A man can only dream lol
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:44 p.m.
#5
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: yikes
Can everyone (including non sharks fans and sharks fans) stop trading Vlasic.

He’s quite literally the definition of an immovable object.

It’s just everyday there’s a sharks post with some dumb trades or moves always involving Vlasic.

Vlasic is worse then skinner and his contract is buyout proof. Only a retiring move from Vlasic will rid us of that money hole.


happy^ THIS
Yeah I get the unrealistic aspect but yeah he is here for quite a few years til bought out.

Can we start an NHL go fund me to allow a compliance buyout?
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:44 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Quoting: yikes
Can everyone (including non sharks fans and sharks fans) stop trading Vlasic.

He’s quite literally the definition of an immovable object.

It’s just everyday there’s a sharks post with some dumb trades or moves always involving Vlasic.

Vlasic is worse then skinner and his contract is buyout proof. Only a retiring move from Vlasic will rid us of that money hole.


Vlasic may be immovable but the prospect of dumping his ****ty contract for Skinner who is also on an awful contract but a better player (and more unlucky) is intriguing to people. Despite the fact that Vlasic will never EVER waive for BUF, the concept of ditching Pickles while buying low on Skinner is one people can't resist trying in AGMs. Don't think it's completely impossible but it's farfetched to say the least.
Feb. 25, 2021 at 11:57 p.m.
#7
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,167
Likes: 8,984
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Vlasic may be immovable but the prospect of dumping his ****ty contract for Skinner who is also on an awful contract but a better player (and more unlucky) is intriguing to people. Despite the fact that Vlasic will never EVER waive for BUF, the concept of ditching Pickles while buying low on Skinner is one people can't resist trying in AGMs. Don't think it's completely impossible but it's farfetched to say the least.


Intriguing to Shark fans, because they dump a dead contract for one that has potential to rebound when taken away from his current coach
Feb. 26, 2021 at 12:05 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Quoting: Shibbal18
Intriguing to Shark fans, because they dump a dead contract for one that has potential to rebound when taken away from his current coach


Yes...?
Feb. 26, 2021 at 12:21 a.m.
#9
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,167
Likes: 8,984
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Yes...?


People implies both sides, only shark fans are intrigued
Feb. 26, 2021 at 12:36 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,204
Likes: 2,861
Quoting: Shibbal18
People implies both sides, only shark fans are intrigued


I agree it's mostly Sharks fans but I've also seen Sabres fans agree to a Vlasic/Skinner swap 1 for 1.
Feb. 26, 2021 at 1:57 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 4,535
I prefer Skinner for karlsson
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll