SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

LA Trade

Created by: ZiggyPalffy
Team: 2020-21 Nashville Predators
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 27, 2021
Published: Feb. 27, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Deal? Deal.
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
2022
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NSH
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$69,840,309$0$2,850,000$11,659,691
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,857,143$2,857,143
C, RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$9,059,000$9,059,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$733,333$733,333
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$730,000$730,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$725,000$725,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$713,333$713,333 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:36 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
way too much from la
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:37 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Quoting: Ryancnbb
way too much from la


What would it cost? I already downsized from the original Turcotte, Thomas, Spence, and a 1st.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:40 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
What would it cost? I already downsized from the original Turcotte, Thomas, Spence, and a 1st.


First, LA said they wanted a LD 25 and under. I dont think the 5th oa pick, two good prospects, and a lottery pick is worth giving up.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:45 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,414
Likes: 3,130
Quoting: Ryancnbb
First, LA said they wanted a LD 25 and under. I dont think the 5th oa pick, two good prospects, and a lottery pick is worth giving up.


Wut?!?!?!

You do realize that LA is currently sitting at 17th OVA in terms of draft position, right?
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:54 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
Quoting: RazWild
Wut?!?!?!

You do realize that LA is currently sitting at 17th OVA in terms of draft position, right?


I know that. but I dont think the winning streak they went on will determine their whole season. you know they r still rebuilding and probs won't make the playoffs
Feb. 27, 2021 at 12:59 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Quoting: Ryancnbb
First, LA said they wanted a LD 25 and under. I dont think the 5th oa pick, two good prospects, and a lottery pick is worth giving up.


Quoting: Ryancnbb
I know that. but I dont think the winning streak they went on will determine their whole season. you know they r still rebuilding and probs won't make the playoffs


They also said they want a guy to play with Doughty and Doughty loves having a defensive D partner.

We aren't getting a lottery pick and if Fabbro and Ekholm are acquired, the chances of that pick becoming even top 10 are slim.

Our LD long term is fine with Bjornfot, Anderson, and Clague. However, they aren't ready to be thrown in the fire if we are going to make the playoffs. Ekholm allows them to develop and learn the NHL with easier minutes while Fabbro is a significant upgrade at RD over what we currently have to replace Doughty some day. Win win for the Kings and help solidify their blueline now and long term.
Ryancnbb liked this.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 1:11 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
They also said they want a guy to play with Doughty and Doughty loves having a defensive D partner.

We aren't getting a lottery pick and if Fabbro and Ekholm are acquired, the chances of that pick becoming even top 10 are slim.

Our LD long term is fine with Bjornfot, Anderson, and Clague. However, they aren't ready to be thrown in the fire if we are going to make the playoffs. Ekholm allows them to develop and learn the NHL with easier minutes while Fabbro is a significant upgrade at RD over what we currently have to replace Doughty some day. Win win for the Kings and help solidify their blueline now and long term.


again tho, r u prepared to give up all those futures? cuz I wouldnt. and don the so sure you will make the play offs.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 1:18 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Quoting: Ryancnbb
again tho, r u prepared to give up all those futures? cuz I wouldnt. and don the so sure you will make the play offs.


We currently hold a playoff spot without them so it's not crazy to think that with Ekholm and Fabbro we are a lock for the playoffs. If we can get a good RW upgrade, we could shock people and go further than anyone ever thought we could.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 1:30 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,414
Likes: 3,130
Quoting: Ryancnbb
I know that. but I dont think the winning streak they went on will determine their whole season. you know they r still rebuilding and probs won't make the playoffs


Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
They also said they want a guy to play with Doughty and Doughty loves having a defensive D partner.

We aren't getting a lottery pick and if Fabbro and Ekholm are acquired, the chances of that pick becoming even top 10 are slim.

Our LD long term is fine with Bjornfot, Anderson, and Clague. However, they aren't ready to be thrown in the fire if we are going to make the playoffs. Ekholm allows them to develop and learn the NHL with easier minutes while Fabbro is a significant upgrade at RD over what we currently have to replace Doughty some day. Win win for the Kings and help solidify their blueline now and long term.


I'd also argue that Turcotte is expendable even if he was a 5th OVA pick. Vilardi is really coming into his own this year and you already have Byfield waiting in the wings too. Plus Tyler Madden to boot.

Turcotte then likely gets pushed to the wing which would be a huge waste of his talents as he deserves to be a center in the NHL, he's too good to not be one, imo. Madden long term can be your 3C of the future and allow you to keep costs down as he'll cost a fraction than what Turcotte is going to when they're both in their primes.

Turcotte is more or less redundant in most future mocks of how the team will look down the line. Shipping him out for a package like this does more for the team long term than if they kept him. It's trading from a position of strength for a position of weakness.

It helps them more or less contend for the cup for a decade plus, vs spending another 3 years getting to that point.

They still need another high-end winger, even though you have Kaliyev. It's LA, I'm certain you'll attract FA's or trade for someone if it becomes a problem.
ZiggyPalffy and villenash liked this.
Feb. 27, 2021 at 1:31 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
Quoting: ZiggyPalffy
We currently hold a playoff spot without them so it's not crazy to think that with Ekholm and Fabbro we are a lock for the playoffs. If we can get a good RW upgrade, we could shock people and go further than anyone ever thought we could.


again, I understand what ur saying, but u would be giving up 4 good prospects
Feb. 27, 2021 at 1:53 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Quoting: RazWild
I'd also argue that Turcotte is expendable even if he was a 5th OVA pick. Vilardi is really coming into his own this year and you already have Byfield waiting in the wings too. Plus Tyler Madden to boot.

Turcotte then likely gets pushed to the wing which would be a huge waste of his talents as he deserves to be a center in the NHL, he's too good to not be one, imo. Madden long term can be your 3C of the future and allow you to keep costs down as he'll cost a fraction than what Turcotte is going to when they're both in their primes.

Turcotte is more or less redundant in most future mocks of how the team will look down the line. Shipping him out for a package like this does more for the team long term than if they kept him. It's trading from a position of strength for a position of weakness.

It helps them more or less contend for the cup for a decade plus, vs spending another 3 years getting to that point.

They still need another high-end winger, even though you have Kaliyev. It's LA, I'm certain you'll attract FA's or trade for someone if it becomes a problem.


We think Kempe will make a great LW for Byfield. With how good Kupari and Madden are doing in the AHL its possibly 1 of them could be put at RW. If that's the case, that leaves 1 hole which would be where Turcotte would be, 2LW. Which as you said, could be a UFA or maybe even trade for one since we'll still have lots of assets.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll