SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Making a team based on others posts

Created by: Gmonwy
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2021
Published: Feb. 28, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Credit to
Systems
Justaboss
assuming Johnson waives
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$2,500,000
4$2,500,000
2$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Colton, Ross [RFA Rights]
  2. Goncalves, Gage
  3. Johnson, Tyler ($900,000 retained)
  4. 2022 1st round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. 2022 6th round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Bennett, Sam [RFA Rights]
3.
CGY
ANA
  1. Giordano, Mark
Additional Details:
Seattle
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$69,097,499$0$147,500$12,402,501
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$801,666$801,666 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 295
It's a lot to take Johnson? I dont know if tampa is that desperate to get rid of him?
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:06 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,241
Likes: 19,510
Loosing Tanev would be a mistake
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:09 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Loosing Tanev would be a mistake


Who do I replace him with? Remove the Boston trade ans do Bennett?
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:11 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who do I replace him with? Remove the Boston trade ans do Bennett?


Giordano.
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:13 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Quoting: PhatRas
Giordano.


This good?
PhatRas liked this.
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:15 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
I think the Johnson trade is one that can benefit both teams. Hes a solid top 9 forward and although that is a hefty package, Tampa will have to do what it takes to get rid of him.
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:23 a.m.
#7
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Twins1568
It's a lot to take Johnson? I dont know if tampa is that desperate to get rid of him?


Agreed, johnson with retention could actually have value, if they retain say $600k more I think johnson a 3.5 is an attractive piece
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:32 a.m.
#8
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 426
Likes: 46
Flames will expose Giordano over Tanev, and Im fairly confident Gio will give the green light to being exposed, as it's highly unlikely Seattle wants a declining 36 year old that has only 1 year left at 6.75M.

Valimaki doesn't require protection at the draft since he didn't play at all last season.

This means either Dube or Mangiapane are going to be the likely players Seattle will go after. However, Lucic should waive his NMC to also be exposed, meaning a protection spot won't be required for him, as again Seattle probably won't want to use their selection to take on his contract, relative to earnings and where he is in his career.

Protection should be this (assuming there is no scoring winger added during this season requiring protection)

F- Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Backlund, Lindholm, Mangiapane, Dube
D - Andersson, Tanev, Hanifin
G - Markstrom
Feb. 28, 2021 at 11:36 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Quoting: DerpNation
Flames will expose Giordano over Tanev, and Im fairly confident Gio will give the green light to being exposed, as it's highly unlikely Seattle wants a declining 36 year old that has only 1 year left at 6.75M.

Valimaki doesn't require protection at the draft since he didn't play at all last season.

This means either Dube or Mangiapane are going to be the likely players Seattle will go after. However, Lucic should waive his NMC to also be exposed, meaning a protection spot won't be required for him, as again Seattle probably won't want to use their selection to take on his contract, relative to earnings and where he is in his career.

Protection should be this (assuming there is no scoring winger added during this season requiring protection)

F- Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Backlund, Lindholm, Mangiapane, Dube
D - Andersson, Tanev, Hanifin
G - Markstrom


Who do you think they take?
Feb. 28, 2021 at 12:23 p.m.
#10
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 426
Likes: 46
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who do you think they take?


Bennett or Kylington if Treliving doesn't add that scoring winger, and Gio and Lucic are OK with being exposed.

If Tre does add that scoring winger and it's not a rental, then Mangiapane or Dube will likely be taken.

This is also why I could see Treliving contemplating packaging Dube or Mangiapane in a trade to acquire that proven scoring winger, as he will lose a protection spot for one of them, risking losing them for nothing anyways.
Feb. 28, 2021 at 12:25 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 601
Either Gonclaves or Colton? Not both
Feb. 28, 2021 at 12:25 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,255
Likes: 10,598
Quoting: DerpNation
Bennett or Kylington if Treliving doesn't add that scoring winger, and Gio and Lucic are OK with being exposed.

If Tre does add that scoring winger and it's not a rental, then Mangiapane or Dube will likely be taken.

This is also why I could see Treliving contemplating packaging Dube or Mangiapane in a trade to acquire that proven scoring winger, as he will lose a protection spot for one of them, risking losing them for nothing anyways.


I can see Tre giving a puck or prospect not to take Dube or Mangiapane. Bennett has been packaged in this ACGM so Kylington?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll