SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks

Created by: SevenLeg
Team: 2021-22 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 1, 2021
Published: Mar. 1, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$800,000
1$900,000
2$2,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,000,000
1$750,000
3$3,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Guenther, Dylan
3$925,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (PHI)
2.
3.
ANA
  1. 2022 5th round pick (NYI)
NYI
    Carter Rowney (Trade Deadline)
    4.
    ANA
    1. Reilly, Will
    2. 2022 1st round pick (PIT)
    PIT
    1. Rakell, Rickard
    Additional Details:
    Trade Deadline
    5.
    ANA
      Seattle
      VGK
      1. Shattenkirk, Kevin
      Additional Details:
      Protection List :
      Milano, Silfverberg, Steel, Jones, Lundestrom, Thompson, Virtanen
      Fowler, Lindholm, Mahura
      Gibson
      Buyouts
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the ANA
      2022
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the PHI
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the NYI
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the NSH
      2023
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      Logo of the ANA
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$81,500,000$53,434,028$0$1,700,000$28,065,972
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      C, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $5,250,000$5,250,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,456,250$1,456,250
      LW, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,450,000$1,450,000
      RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,400,000$1,400,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $2,602,778$2,602,778
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,875,000$3,875,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,400,000$6,400,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      LD/RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $950,000$950,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $750,000$750,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $900,000$900,000
      LD/RD
      RFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $800,000$800,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $6,875,000$6,875,000
      C, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $1,700,000$1,700,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
      $800,000$800,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 9:48 a.m.
      #1
      Hockey God Genius
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 3,261
      Likes: 811
      Pens want Rakell badly and ive been only trading for him for 5 yrs now almost every month, lol.
      SevenLeg liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 9:52 a.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2018
      Posts: 5,139
      Likes: 5,943
      I would want a prospect added into the Manson trade or a 3rd

      I would much rather do that Sabres trade than the rumored Virtanen-Heinen swap that seemed to fizzle out thankfully, but Ideally I want to keep Heinen

      Not much to say about Rowney

      Dont like PITs prospect pool at all, but a good prospect and a 1st gets Rakell

      If the Ducks wouldnt give up Heinen for Virtanen theres no shot they give up Terry.

      Manson and Shattenkirk havent looked great, No shot we dont go 7-3-1 for protection

      Assuming your trades go through
      Milano, Silf, Steel, Jones, Lundestrom, Thompson, Virtanen
      Lindholm, Fowler, Mahura ( I'm a strong advocate of exposing both Shattenkirk and Manson if we still have both, Mahura is more valuable than both imo and it isnt close)
      Gibson
      SevenLeg liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 9:53 a.m.
      #3
      Thread Starter
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2019
      Posts: 16,171
      Likes: 20,494
      Quoting: Sidstick87
      Pens want Rakell badly and I've been only trading for him for 5 yrs now almost every month, lol.


      His value is hard to gauge, but I think the Ducks have played their hand for too long.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 9:54 a.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2019
      Posts: 16,171
      Likes: 20,494
      Quoting: Salzy
      I would want a prospect added into the Manson trade or a 3rd

      I would much rather do that Sabres trade than the rumored Virtanen-Heinen swap that seemed to fizzle out thankfully, but Ideally I want to keep Heinen

      Not much to say about Rowney

      Dont like PITs prospect pool at all, but a good prospect and a 1st gets Rakell

      If the Ducks wouldnt give up Heinen for Virtanen theres no shot they give up Terry.

      Manson and Shattenkirk havent looked great, No shot we dont go 7-3-1 for protection

      Assuming your trades go through
      Milano, Silf, Steel, Jones, Lundestrom, Thompson, Virtanen
      Lindholm, Fowler, Mahura ( I'm a strong advocate of exposing both Shattenkirk and Manson if we still have both, Mahura is more valuable than both imo and it isnt close)
      Gibson


      Damn I was sure Mahura was exempt. My bad.
      Salzy liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 9:56 a.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2018
      Posts: 5,139
      Likes: 5,943
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      Damn I was sure Mahura was exempt. My bad.


      Unfortunately not, I've been very high on him for a long time, I dont think we can afford to lose him for nothing, Losing a year of Manson or 2 of Shattenkirk for nothing doesnt hurt us nearly as bad as losing Mahura for nothing
      SevenLeg liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
      #6
      Thread Starter
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2019
      Posts: 16,171
      Likes: 20,494
      Quoting: Salzy
      Unfortunately not, I've been very high on him for a long time, I dont think we can afford to lose him for nothing, Losing a year of Manson or 2 of Shattenkirk for nothing doesnt hurt us nearly as bad as losing Mahura for nothing


      Quoting: Salzy


      I would want a prospect added into the Manson trade or a 3rd

      Manson and Shattenkirk havent looked great


      Isn't that a bit contradictory though? I mean, he'll be a rental next year. I think a 2nd for one year of Manson is fine.
      Salzy liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:02 a.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2018
      Posts: 5,139
      Likes: 5,943
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      Isn't that a bit contradictory though? I mean, he'll be a rental next year. I think a 2nd for one year of Manson is fine.


      Yeah it could be seen that way, Prior to the season starting I would have expected something like Liljegren+ a 2nd so in that sense a 2nd+3rd is lowering expectations, I wouldnt be mad at just a second though
      SevenLeg liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:04 a.m.
      #8
      Lenny7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 13,291
      Likes: 11,051
      -I think I'd rather hold onto Manson and see if he can boost his value a bit when he gets healthy. A 2nd and a so/so prospect would probably be fine value-wise currently though.
      -I don't hate the Buffalo trade (I like it more than Heinen for Virt), but I'd rather keep Heinen TBH. Maybe package him somewhere else?
      -I'd want a slightly better prospect in that Rakell trade.
      -Meh to Virtanen. Definitely needs a change of scenery, but I think I'd rather the cap space to do a quick shuffle.
      -If I were GMBM, I'd absolutely be attempting to shop Silfverberg and Rakell.
      SevenLeg and Salzy liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:07 a.m.
      #9
      Thread Starter
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2019
      Posts: 16,171
      Likes: 20,494
      Quoting: Lenny7
      -I think I'd rather hold onto Manson and see if he can boost his value a bit when he gets healthy. A 2nd and a so/so prospect would probably be fine value-wise currently though.
      -I don't hate the Buffalo trade (I like it more than Heinen for Virt), but I'd rather keep Heinen TBH. Maybe package him somewhere else?
      -I'd want a slightly better prospect in that Rakell trade.
      -Meh to Virtanen. Definitely needs a change of scenery, but I think I'd rather the cap space to do a quick shuffle.
      -If I were GMBM, I'd absolutely be attempting to shop Silfverberg and Rakell.


      Tbh I think Silfverberg is a guy you should keep around. That forward core will be young when Getzlaf hangs them up.
      Salzy and Lenny7 liked this.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:08 a.m.
      #10
      Lenny7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 13,291
      Likes: 11,051
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      His value is hard to gauge, but I think the Ducks have played their hand for too long.


      If we had known this was going to happen, there would have been a ton of value coming back a couple of years ago. I still think they get a 1st+Bish prospect for him. I'd like to see him play with Zegras and Steel (Or even Rico) or something along those lines.
      Mar. 1, 2021 at 10:10 a.m.
      #11
      Lenny7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 13,291
      Likes: 11,051
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      Tbh I think Silfverberg is a guy you should keep around. That forward core will be young when Getzlaf hangs them up.


      I think I'm one of the few Ducks fans that doesn't really like him TBH. He still has value, and has been really good possession-wise for the Ducks, but if I'm shedding some money to try for a quick flip and fix, Silf is one of the first guys that I move.
      SevenLeg liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll