SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rough Ideas

Created by: Traptor
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 1, 2021
Published: Mar. 1, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Mantha, Anthony
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (DET)
2.
BUF
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
  2. Zary, Connor
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
3.
BOS
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (CGY)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$67,526,666$0$457,500$13,973,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$875,000$875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:29 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
This team just became 10 ply
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:31 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: DirtyDangles
This team just became 10 ply


Do mantha and debrush play that soft?
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:32 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: MyBaby
Do mantha and debrush play that soft?


Compared to Tkachuk and Bennett...yes they do.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:35 p.m.
#4
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7,154
Detroit isn't selling Mantha while his stock is low. We're not giving up a high 2nd, which will be essentially a late 1st. I'm not opposed to a Monahan-Mantha swap, but not adding that high 2nd as well. 3rd or lower and we're in the ballpark.
Octopus_Guy and Traptor liked this.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:40 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Compared to Tkachuk and Bennett...yes they do.


You can always fill the bottom 6 with more sandpaper. Let you top 6 play a skill game. Calgary will likely be icing completely new bottom 6 next year. Top 6 wingers with some bite are not cheap. But if CGY wants Eichel, the conversation starts with Chuky. Bennett is almost 100% gone next year anyways. And I don't believe Mantha will play any softer then Monahan
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:41 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Detroit isn't selling Mantha while his stock is low. We're not giving up a high 2nd, which will be essentially a late 1st. I'm not opposed to a Monahan-Mantha swap, but not adding that high 2nd as well. 3rd or lower and we're in the ballpark.


As long as we're in agreement that there needs to be a bit of an add.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
#7
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7,154
Quoting: MyBaby
As long as we're in agreement that there needs to be a bit of an add.

I try to be unbiased and not be a homer when evaluating value and generally, a top 6 center is worth more than a top 6 winger.
Traptor liked this.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: MyBaby
You can always fill the bottom 6 with more sandpaper. Let you top 6 play a skill game. Calgary will likely be icing completely new bottom 6 next year. Top 6 wingers with some bite are not cheap. But if CGY wants Eichel, the conversation starts with Chuky. Bennett is almost 100% gone next year anyways. And I don't believe Mantha will play any softer then Monahan


So who is BUF going to get to play 1C then? Staal, Middstadt...oof!
Traptor liked this.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:11 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 439
Likes: 84
I stole this Mantha/Monahan idea, thanks.
Traptor liked this.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: DirtyDangles
So who is BUF going to get to play 1C then? Staal, Middstadt...oof!


Yea I know. But whenever a trade proposal with Monahan to buff gets brought up they say he has no value to them because if they trade Eichel they are rebuilding. I guess it depends on the direction they want to go in. They could sign a guy like Denault to cover them until cozens can step up.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:29 p.m.
#11
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,924
Likes: 5,357
Take out the 2nd and wings accept
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: MyBaby
Yea I know. But whenever a trade proposal with Monahan to buff gets brought up they say he has no value to them because if they trade Eichel they are rebuilding. I guess it depends on the direction they want to go in. They could sign a guy like Denault to cover them until cozens can step up.


BUF is in constant rebuild lol. They aren't going to get picks and prospects only as nobody can take on $10 mil without sending cap back. I think Monahan makes a lot of sense. He can fill in at 1C until Cozens is ready (if he gets there) and then move into a comfortable 2C role. Middlestadt is hot garbage and doesn't look to be more than a bottom 6F. A change of scenery could really help Monahan. Plus they would get at least a 1 if not 2 firsts back plus a prospect or role player so imo that helps with a rebuild.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 5,453
Quoting: MyBaby
Do mantha and debrush play that soft?


Quoting: DirtyDangles
Compared to Tkachuk and Bennett...yes they do.


Indeed but one is a 4th liner, the two others are top6 players.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: bhavikp27
Indeed but one is a 4th liner, the two others are top6 players.


Debrusk is a middle 6F. Mantha a 2nd Liner. Tkachuk is a 1st liner, Bennett bottom 6F leaning to 3rd liner.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:47 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 5,453
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Debrusk is a middle 6F. Mantha a 2nd Liner. Tkachuk is a 1st liner, Bennett bottom 6F leaning to 3rd liner.


You call DeBrusk middle- 6F and Mantha 2nd liner but Bennett "leaning to 3rd liner" tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:52 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: DirtyDangles
BUF is in constant rebuild lol. They aren't going to get picks and prospects only as nobody can take on $10 mil without sending cap back. I think Monahan makes a lot of sense. He can fill in at 1C until Cozens is ready (if he gets there) and then move into a comfortable 2C role. Middlestadt is hot garbage and doesn't look to be more than a bottom 6F. A change of scenery could really help Monahan. Plus they would get at least a 1 if not 2 firsts back plus a prospect or role player so imo that helps with a rebuild.


If you can flip Monahan instead of Chuky for Eichel you do that forsure. There would have to be a big add however and I don't think Calgary has the asset necessary to do that. The closest player would be Valmiki.
But I do think Chuky as the centerpiece for Eichel makes it one of the more competitive offers they will receive. Denault will be available and has proven he can carry that workload while Cozens develops. A top 6 starting with denault - chuky - cozens - reinheart - olofsson is a pretty solid starting point and I would take that over monahan - cozens - reinheart - olofsson - ?.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:54 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: buffbry
Take out the 2nd and wings accept


Monahan has more value than Mantha. He is a center and has better and more consistent production. Higher draft pedigree. Higher highs. Smaller lows. Detroit has to add something for it to make sense
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:56 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: bhavikp27
You call DeBrusk middle- 6F and Mantha 2nd liner but Bennett "leaning to 3rd liner" tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy


I would say Mantha is top 6, debrusk is middle 6 and Bennett is bottom 6.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 1:57 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: bhavikp27
You call DeBrusk middle- 6F and Mantha 2nd liner but Bennett "leaning to 3rd liner" tears of joy tears of joy tears of joy


Debrusk plays for one of the best teams in the league and hasn't got over 45 points. Mantha plays for the worst team in the league year over year and slightly out performs him. Bennett is a fringe 3rd liner. Tkachuk is by far the best player of the 4. Maybe Mantha is also a middle 6 player but I think on a better team he does much better.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 2:06 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 5,453
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Debrusk plays for one of the best teams in the league and hasn't got over 45 points. Mantha plays for the worst team in the league year over year and slightly out performs him. Bennett is a fringe 3rd liner. Tkachuk is by far the best player of the 4. Maybe Mantha is also a middle 6 player but I think on a better team he does much better.


How is he a fringe 3rd liner? His average number of points over the past three years: 22. Not good defensively or on the PP either.

I never talked about Tkachuk.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 2:11 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Rough indeed lol, very rough and not gonna happen (at least the bruins one)
Mar. 1, 2021 at 2:21 p.m.
#22
RifRaf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 106
Likes: 9
I don't think Chucky is involved in a trade for Eichel. Would love to get him but not what you propose. I could see ditching the Det and Bos trade and adding in Monahan and Bennett while removing Chucky to get Eichel as more realistic.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 2:32 p.m.
#23
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: bhavikp27
How is he a fringe 3rd liner? His average number of points over the past three years: 22. Not good defensively or on the PP either.

I never talked about Tkachuk.


Lines aren't based solely on points you understand that right? Bennett has been a 3rd liner on CGY and would be pretty well anywhere.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 162
Quoting: Old_Flames_Fan
I don't think Chucky is involved in a trade for Eichel. Would love to get him but not what you propose. I could see ditching the Det and Bos trade and adding in Monahan and Bennett while removing Chucky to get Eichel as more realistic.


Yea it would suck to lose Chuky but I think that's the cost. If I put myself in buffalo's shoes that what I want from Calgary. And if i'm Calgary I really think about it. I would rather have Eichel at 10m then Chuky at 9m. And you're giving up a few extra pieces but you're not selling the farm.

But monahan + zary+ 1st + bennett is definitely a better deal from the flames perspective.
Mar. 1, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
#25
RifRaf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 106
Likes: 9
Quoting: MyBaby
Yea it would suck to lose Chuky but I think that's the cost. If I put myself in buffalo's shoes that what I want from Calgary. And if i'm Calgary I really think about it. I would rather have Eichel at 10m then Chuky at 9m. And you're giving up a few extra pieces but you're not selling the farm.

But monahan + zary+ 1st + bennett is definitely a better deal from the flames perspective.


For the Flames, you have to look at the proposal long term. If we lose Chucky think we stay mediocre. Eichel needs good players to play with and that needs to be Chucky. Johnny says he wants to stay in YYC but what else is he going to say. I think he moves on after this deal. SO we have to look at losing Monahan, Chucky and possible Johnny. That's not a great future. I could see Manahan, one of Zary/Pelletier, 1st and either Dube/Mangiapane for Eichel. I would even add a second to get it done. If you get him you have to over pay and keep Chucky at the same time.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll