SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL Deal with NSH

Created by: owentippett
Team: 2020-21 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2021
Published: Mar. 2, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Along with Ekholm, looks as if the Flyers are interested in Granlund as well.

What is the price?

NOTE: Ekholm signs <4 year extension with PHI (Team looks to protect him at expansion by offering compensation to SEA).
Trades
1.
PHI
ANA
  1. Niskanen, Matt
Additional Details:
Retired
2.
PHI
ARI
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
Additional Details:
Anywhere
3.
PHI
  1. Ekholm, Mattias
  2. Granlund, Mikael ($1,875,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Ekholm signs
NSH
  1. Frost, Morgan
  2. Hägg, Robert
  3. Twarynski, Carsen
  4. 2021 1st round pick (PHI)
  5. 2022 4th round pick (PHI)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2022
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2023
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$68,354,924$66,037$582,500$13,145,076
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,333,333$4,333,333
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,137,500$4,137,500
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$874,125$874,125
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,725,000$4,725,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,550,000$2,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$736,666$736,666 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,200,000$1,200,000 ($125,000$125K$125,000$125K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 2, 2021 at 9:25 a.m.
#1
Go Preds
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 450
I would accept this as Nashville
owentippett liked this.
Mar. 2, 2021 at 9:54 a.m.
#2
Nik_SH
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 637
Likes: 77
As Preds fan I wouldn't accept that trade.
Value of Granlund (with half retention) should be around late 1st.
So I do not think that Ekholm for Frost is a good trade.
Especially due to the fact, that Predators have no interest in Hägg or Twarynski (in such type of trades such players are dead weight).

In my mind this trade should looks like that:
Granlund (half retention)+Ekholm
for
2021 1st, Frost, York, Gostisbehere(dead weight).
Seems more fair.
Mar. 2, 2021 at 9:57 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 426
Likes: 155
Quoting: Nik_SH
As Preds fan I wouldn't accept that trade.
Value of Granlund (with half retention) should be around late 1st.
So I do not think that Ekholm for Frost is a good trade.
Especially due to the fact, that Predators have no interest in Hägg or Twarynski (in such type of trades such players are dead weight).

In my mind this trade should looks like that:
Granlund (half retention)+Ekholm
for
2021 1st, Frost, York, Gostisbehere(dead weight).
Seems more fair.


Took a while for Granlund to get a deal in the offseason, and he is only on contract til the end of the year - signifying he is a rental. I don't see him being worth a late 1st with his stats this season and the role he'd play in PHI. That's just my opinion though.

Looking at your offer, you're essentially saying a 1st, two A-prospects and Ghost (who actually has decent stats this year) for an expiring UFA and Ekholm. I wouldn't take that on PHI's end
Mar. 2, 2021 at 11:31 a.m.
#4
Nik_SH
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 637
Likes: 77
Quoting: carterhart
Took a while for Granlund to get a deal in the offseason, and he is only on contract til the end of the year - signifying he is a rental. I don't see him being worth a late 1st with his stats this season and the role he'd play in PHI. That's just my opinion though.

Looking at your offer, you're essentially saying a 1st, two A-prospects and Ghost (who actually has decent stats this year) for an expiring UFA and Ekholm. I wouldn't take that on PHI's end


I saw a lot of concepts where fans of the other teams pay late 1st for Granlund (with half retention). So I would prefer to get this first round pick for Granny.
So, yes it is two A prospects+3 years of dead weight for Ekholm.

For me Ghost is a dead weight (pretty close to absolutely negative value). With that trade Philadelphia saves 4m for next 3 years, gets Ekholm for the next 2 years and only pays 2 A lvl prospects.
Mar. 2, 2021 at 11:40 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 426
Likes: 155
Quoting: Nik_SH
I saw a lot of concepts where fans of the other teams pay late 1st for Granlund (with half retention). So I would prefer to get this first round pick for Granny.
So, yes it is two A prospects+3 years of dead weight for Ekholm.

For me Ghost is a dead weight (pretty close to absolutely negative value). With that trade Philadelphia saves 4m for next 3 years, gets Ekholm for the next 2 years and only pays 2 A lvl prospects.


If Ghost is dead weight, then no point in PHI offering him, as he's providing value to the team right now. Adding assets to ship a guy to a team that isn't necessarily dead weight to you isn't a good move for them; which is why I offered Hagg and other pieces instead.
Mar. 2, 2021 at 11:44 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 502
Quoting: Nik_SH
I saw a lot of concepts where fans of the other teams pay late 1st for Granlund (with half retention). So I would prefer to get this first round pick for Granny.
So, yes it is two A prospects+3 years of dead weight for Ekholm.

For me Ghost is a dead weight (pretty close to absolutely negative value). With that trade Philadelphia saves 4m for next 3 years, gets Ekholm for the next 2 years and only pays 2 A lvl prospects.


This is the best Ghost has looked since his 65 point season. He might not be producing at that rate but he's been 10x better defensively and it looks like the offensive side to his game is coming around I wouldn't say he's dead weight at this point
owentippett liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll