SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Addressing the defense

Created by: Shane_Kelly
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 7, 2021
Published: Mar. 7, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Now that Carlo is going to be out for "a while" and has been listed as 'week to week' the Bruins defense is bare. Guys will need to step up to fill holes that Carlo Lauzon, and miller filled. These next 5-10 games will be a very important segment for Don Sweeney and the Bruins. This will really test their young defenseman and tell them what they have. If they struggle in these next ten games, then it is a telling sign that Sweeney needs to a legit top-4dman to stay competitive this season (ekholm), if the young guys hold their own, then sweeney can either focus on finding another forward, or just a depth defenseman to build up the backend.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$77,430,648$964,222$2,832,500$4,069,352
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:43 p.m.
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Cmon, you know the situation with the expansion draft. Ekholm and boston should never be in the same sentence until after this season is over.
BruinsCharlies and KennyBoi liked this.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:47 p.m.
#2
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,593
Likes: 8,268
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Cmon, you know the situation with the expansion draft. Ekholm and boston should never be in the same sentence until after this season is over.


If you trade for ekholm and protect him you lose gryz but not lauzon. Dont do it protect gryz you lose lauzon keep gryz. So would you rather have lauzon and ekholm without gryz or gryz without lauzon and ekholm or how do you think it shakes out?
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,578
Likes: 5,454
"if the young guys hold their own" Disagree, this team needs a top4 LD even if they play well until Carlo returns. No top pair LD and only one top4 LD, it won't work in the playoffs (if you want to win).
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Shane Kelly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 854
Likes: 296
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Cmon, you know the situation with the expansion draft. Ekholm and boston should never be in the same sentence until after this season is over.


Look, if they want to win the cup, getting Ekholm can help them SIGNIFICANTLY, and I understand the expansion situation, but there are always ways around not being able to protect certain guys. If the bruins trade for Ekholm and win the cup, I think it will be okay if they lose Gryz or Lauzon in the expansion draft.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:54 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Jfstompers
If you trade for ekholm and protect him you lose gryz but not lauzon. Dont do it protect gryz you lose lauzon keep gryz. So would you rather have lauzon and ekholm without gryz or gryz without lauzon and ekholm or how do you think it shakes out?


What? I would rather the bruins not go after Ekholm. And, whether or not any of us want them to do things, one thing is ridiculously clear. Don Sweeney is not adding a d man with term. It’s just not a real life concept that’s even worth discussing.

Losing Grzelcyk in expansion skews the value of the trade to the point where there is no possibility of Nashville and Boston agreeing upon terms. It’s just so outlandish we might as well talk about McDavid trades. It’s not happening. No shot.
KennyBoi liked this.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:54 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Shane Kelly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 854
Likes: 296
Quoting: bhavikp27
"if the young guys hold their own" Disagree, this team needs a top4 LD even if they play well until Carlo returns. No top pair LD and only one top4 LD, it won't work in the playoffs (if you want to win).


I 100% agree, but you already know someone like Bcarlo25 and Silkysmooth will come in and not be happy with what I said (Bcarlo25 already did!)
Mar. 7, 2021 at 12:55 p.m.
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Shane_Kelly
Look, if they want to win the cup, getting Ekholm can help them SIGNIFICANTLY, and I understand the expansion situation, but there are always ways around not being able to protect certain guys. If the bruins trade for Ekholm and win the cup, I think it will be okay if they lose Gryz or Lauzon in the expansion draft.


On xbox, that’s fine. If you’re trying to build something that makes sense, you’re just not doing it. Don Sweeney is in charge. He has made it ridiculously clear that there’s no d man with term coming.

I’ll make an ACGM with the kind of move I think might be reasonable.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 1:03 p.m.
#8
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,593
Likes: 8,268
Quoting: Shane_Kelly
I 100% agree, but you already know someone like Bcarlo25 and Silkysmooth will come in and not be happy with what I said (Bcarlo25 already did!)


I think you lose gryz or lauzon to seattle no matter what you trade for so having ekholm is maybe even more important to next season as it is to this season. I dont believe trading for someone with term is a bad idea.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 1:59 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 326
Quoting: Shane_Kelly
Look, if they want to win the cup, getting Ekholm can help them SIGNIFICANTLY, and I understand the expansion situation, but there are always ways around not being able to protect certain guys. If the bruins trade for Ekholm and win the cup, I think it will be okay if they lose Gryz or Lauzon in the expansion draft.


The key question is that if they trade for Ekholm are they a legitimate Cup contender? Assuming we trade Vaak and a 1st for him then is the above lineup talented, experienced, deep and battle tested enough at all positions to legitimately get out of the East, beat Vegas, Colorado or St. Louis in a 7 game series and then one of Toronto, Montreal, Tampa or Carolina in another 7 game series? If you think so then make the trade. I don't think so I would not make the trade and would save my bullets for after the expansion draft and next year.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 2:12 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 326
Quoting: bhavikp27
"if the young guys hold their own" Disagree, this team needs a top4 LD even if they play well until Carlo returns. No top pair LD and only one top4 LD, it won't work in the playoffs (if you want to win).


I'm of the belief that a top 4 LD might be needed just to make the playoffs. I still don't make the trade because winning the Cup is so much more than just making the playoffs and I don't think this team is capable of that.
Mar. 7, 2021 at 5:08 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 535
Ekholm should not be one of the options Sweeney looks for at all. He needs to target expiring Top4 LD not a guy with term since the expansion draft. Plus Top4 LD isn't the primary issue with this team, Lauz and Zboril are proving they can hang with that responsibility. 5on5 scoring is still the primary issue imo.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll