SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Exposure Requirements

Team: 2020-21 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2021
Published: Mar. 10, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I was just looking over the exposure requirements for the expansion draft and there are a couple of teams in a real predicament in which they won't be exposing enough players with 40 games this year or 70 in the past two who are under contract through 2021.

Calgary has this problem too with the only players who will end up meeting this requirement being Tkachuk, Gaudreau, Monahan, Backlund, Lucic (NMC), Lindholm, and Mangiapane. Unless they make a move they must expose two of them.

Columbus has a similar problem except its between Atkinson, Nyquist, Domi, Jenner, Bjorkstrand, Roslovic, and Eric Robinson.

I'm assuming all the teams in this type of position will just trade for a player meeting the exposure requirements or play players into the requirements.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2022
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the ANA
2023
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$81,500,000$54,948,306$0$0$26,551,694
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,325,000$1,325,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,995,000$4,995,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$975,000$975,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,030,952$2,030,952
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,062,500$1,062,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$725,000$725,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10, 2021 at 12:19 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,861
Likes: 6,452
They changed it to 27 and 54 due to the less amount of games played in the last 2 seasons.
Mar. 10, 2021 at 12:20 p.m.
#2
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,210
Likes: 20,559
Some of them will just re-sign a few depth pieces, like the Habs will do with Corey Perry imo. Calgary can qualify Bennett or trade him for a players who meet the requirements, and re-sign a guy like Derek Ryan for cheap.
Mar. 10, 2021 at 12:24 p.m.
#3
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,349
Likes: 9,276
Toronto is also in this predicament. Interested to see how these things play out.
Mar. 10, 2021 at 12:32 p.m.
#4
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 2,260
I bet some RFAs (Kevin Stenlund on CBJ and perhaps Dominik Simon on CGY) will get extensions sometime prior to the expansion draft. That's one way around it at least
Mar. 10, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,645
Likes: 26,365
Your point is well taken. On the other side, some teams (notably Arizona and Nashville) have an excess of qualified forwards, so they may be more popular at the deadline than normal. And on the flip side of THAT, note that Arizona only has three qualified defensemen, including prospect Kyle Capobianco, so they would have to re-up Lyubushkin or Oesterle or find someone else.
Mar. 10, 2021 at 6:46 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 865
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Your point is well taken. On the other side, some teams (notably Arizona and Nashville) have an excess of qualified forwards, so they may be more popular at the deadline than normal. And on the flip side of THAT, note that Arizona only has three qualified defensemen, including prospect Kyle Capobianco, so they would have to re-up Lyubushkin or Oesterle or find someone else.


I'm pretty sure you only need to qualify one defenseman but if Arizona was planning on protecting Chychrun, OEL, and Capobianco then yes.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 10, 2021 at 10:26 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,645
Likes: 26,365
Quoting: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
I'm pretty sure you only need to qualify one defenseman but if Arizona was planning on protecting Chychrun, OEL, and Capobianco then yes.


Yes, you only need to qualify one defenseman, but Demers, Goligoski and Hjalmarsson are all UFAs in addition to Lyubushkin and Oesterle, and Capobianco is the only other defenseman they have who is eligible.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll