SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burakovsky Taken by Seattle

Created by: Anus_McLeod
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 18, 2021
Published: Mar. 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Avs protect 8 skaters because Johnson isn't asked to or doesn't agree to waive his NMC. MacKinnon, Landeskog, Rantanen, Kadri, Makar, Girard, Toews, and Johnson is the protected list.

Toews will not end up in Seattle. There is just no way. He leads the team in TOI, and is extremely valuable. He'll be protected in any scenario, and so will Makar and Girard.

Burakovsky is good, and I'd hate to lose him, but I think they can replace him if they absolutely have to. I have Tatar in the below, but Iafallo is another UFA that could work, as are Hoffman, Danault, or Palmieri. A trade is a possibility as well.

Personally I think Johnson waives his contractual NMC in exchange for a handshake NMC and this is all moot, but just throwing the scenario out there.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,250,000
3$6,850,000
3$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
7$7,000,000
5$4,850,000
3$4,850,000
Trades
1.
COL
    Seattle
    2.
    COL
    1. 2021 4th round pick (OTT)
    2. 2022 2nd round pick (NYR)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    2022
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    2023
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$81,583,963$1,741,463$2,700,000-$83,963
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,300,000$6,300,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $9,250,000$9,250,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,850,000$4,850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $4,850,000$4,850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $925,000$925,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $725,000$725,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,850,000$6,850,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    G
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    LD/RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $725,000$725,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $798,333$798,333
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:21 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 27,635
    Likes: 14,424
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:25 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado


    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:26 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    Landeskog is a UFA, just wait to sign him until after the draft. His agent can always tell Seattle he won't sign with them and then he'd be a UFA July 1 free to resign with Colorado


    It's certainly a possibility. This is meant to illustrate the worst case scenario. If they do that though then Seattle takes Graves and Sakic needs to figure out how to move one of Compher or Donskoi so he can re-sign Saad.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:27 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 1,736
    Likes: 469
    All of the takes with the Rangers re-acquiring Ryan Graves crack me up. Tony D has a better chance of playing for the Rangers again.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:31 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 27,635
    Likes: 14,424
    Quoting: coga16
    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk


    you can agree to a deal verbally, just dont sign it. if you don't trust him then what are you doing?
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:32 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    you can agree to a deal verbally, just dont sign it. if you don't trust him then what are you doing?


    if you have a deal in place, just sign it, dont mess around. Seattle could offer him 2-3m more than the Avs and tempt things.
    Its just wreckless approach to a stately cup teams window, you dont take unnecessary chances.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:33 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 27,635
    Likes: 14,424
    Quoting: coga16
    if you have a deal in place, just sign it, dont mess around. Seattle could offer him 2-3m more than the Avs and tempt things.
    Its just wreckless approach to a stately cup teams window, you dont take unnecessary chances.


    so you don't trust your team captain. if he was interested in hearing that stuff, he would wait until the tampering period to sign anyways.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:34 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: BSpadaro83
    All of the takes with the Rangers re-acquiring Ryan Graves crack me up. Tony D has a better chance of playing for the Rangers again.


    Why? Seems like they could use a good LHD. Hajek might be okay, but it seems like an area they can upgrade. What am I missing?
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:35 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    so you don't trust your team captain. if he was interested in hearing that stuff, he would wait until the tampering period to sign anyways.


    Thats his agents job to get him the best deal possible,
    This is a business, if Seattle came in and offered him 9m aav, you dont think they go back to the Avs and ask them if they can increase their price.

    Its just a dumb idea to let him go to tampering
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:36 p.m.
    #10
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 15,595
    Likes: 9,676
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:38 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 1,736
    Likes: 469
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    Why? Seems like they could use a good LHD. Hajek might be okay, but it seems like an area they can upgrade. What am I missing?


    GM pride. Not gonna sell a guy for peanuts you gave up, watch him bloom somewhere else (which may just be the perfect situation to over value him a ton) and then pay real assets to bring him back, especially knowing the player knows your org and knows you gave up on him. Just not a realistic scenario.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:42 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: BSpadaro83
    GM pride. Not gonna sell a guy for peanuts you gave up, watch him bloom somewhere else (which may just be the perfect situation to over value him a ton) and then pay real assets to bring him back, especially knowing the player knows your org and knows you gave up on him. Just not a realistic scenario.


    I would hope GM decisions are made with more consideration to the future, but you could be right. Someone will take him though, no doubt. Rangers were a low hanging fruit in this acgm, which was more about illustrating the loss of Burakovsky.
    BSpadaro83 liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:44 p.m.
    #13
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    There is no chance Girard will be available. I'd be thrilled if they opt for Graves over Burakovsky, as Colorado has plenty of LHD to absorb that loss. I don't see it that way though.
    exo2769 liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
    #14
    John 3 16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 9,581
    Likes: 4,618
    Quoting: coga16
    no..you dont do th at. You do not play chicken with your captain and arguable one of your most important fwds. Do not let him get to the legal tampering period. Big name UFAs who get that point do not come back and sign with their teams.

    Its an unnecessary risk


    This. Do not give Seattle the opportunity to float $10m in front of Landeskog. They can easily afford to overpay on him and he'd be a perfect captain for an expansion franchise. Not worth the risk.
    exo2769, coga16 and TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:49 p.m.
    #15
    retired
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 8,893
    Likes: 4,761
    interesting idea. i think id just trade or buyout johnson before exposing bura but bura is replaceable. maybe seattle will take compher too if the avs agree to let them take bura.

    hate the saad contract. 5 years is way to long. not a fan of tatar either. but there are always a few good free agent options.

    not a big fan of bridging makar but he and his agent may choose that route.
    Anus_McLeod and TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:51 p.m.
    #16
    retired
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 8,893
    Likes: 4,761
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    with the way graves is playing i could see them passing and just taking nuke or jost instead.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:51 p.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    girard makar and Toews arent going anywhere, you can put a pin in that
    exo2769 and TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: DirtyDangle
    interesting idea. i think id just trade or buyout johnson before exposing bura but bura is replaceable. maybe seattle will take compher too if the avs agree to let them take bura.

    hate the saad contract. 5 years is way to long. not a fan of tatar either. but there are always a few good free agent options.

    not a big fan of bridging makar but he and his agent may choose that route.


    All fair points. I hate the EJ buyout, as that means paying him when MacKinnon is due for his raise and when Makar is due his after the bridge (not to mention Byram and others). Just losing Bura is arguably more appealing than the buyout.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:57 p.m.
    #19
    retired
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 8,893
    Likes: 4,761
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    All fair points. I hate the EJ buyout, as that means paying him when MacKinnon is due for his raise and when Makar is due his after the bridge (not to mention Byram and others). Just losing Bura is arguably more appealing than the buyout.


    then you're still stuck with johnsons contract for the next few years. neither option is that appealing. ideally the avs can trade him with a pick.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:06 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: DirtyDangle
    then you're still stuck with johnsons contract for the next few years. neither option is that appealing. ideally the avs can trade him with a pick.


    It's just two more years, meaning he's completely off the books when MacKinnon gets his raise. I think that's a big factor. Trading even with max retention and a sweetener is preferable to the buyout.
    DirtyDangle liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:18 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 27,635
    Likes: 14,424
    Quoting: Richard88
    This. Do not give Seattle the opportunity to float $10m in front of Landeskog. They can easily afford to overpay on him and he'd be a perfect captain for an expansion franchise. Not worth the risk.


    If he was interested in seeing what was out there he would simply not sign before the draft anyways
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:18 p.m.
    #22
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 16,164
    Likes: 20,485
    Quoting: exo2769
    Seattle is taking one of the Dmen. Even if EJ waives...it'll be graves. Otherwise it could be one of Graves, Girard, or Toews if EJ doesn't want to waive.


    If he doesn't want to waive, I think they'd buy him out before exposing Girard or Toews lol.
    exo2769 and TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 2:45 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,492
    Likes: 4,549
    Trade or buy out happens with EJ before this if he doesn't waive. Colorado are trying to build a rep of being decent to their players but there's only so far it can be pushed and in those circumstances that's what happens. This doesn't.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 3:18 p.m.
    #24
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 3,579
    Likes: 3,440
    Quoting: TJTwolf
    Trade or buy out happens with EJ before this if he doesn't waive. Colorado are trying to build a rep of being decent to their players but there's only so far it can be pushed and in those circumstances that's what happens. This doesn't.


    I would be legitimately shocked if they bought him out. That's no good for anyone, as that $2M really hurts and it isn't doing right by a guy who has been loyal to the organization.

    If you think about it as adding $2M to Burakovsky's salary it kinda hits home a bit. Would you sign Bura for $6.9M (possibly more when his deal is up)? That's kinda what's happening in a sense.

    I do get your point of view on this, but I really fear the repercussions outweigh the benefits, especially if the team can just sign Iafallo or someone to replace Burky. I also think Johnson waives though and we don't need to worry about it.
    TJTwolf liked this.
    Mar. 18, 2021 at 3:46 p.m.
    #25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,492
    Likes: 4,549
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    I would be legitimately shocked if they bought him out. That's no good for anyone, as that $2M really hurts and it isn't doing right by a guy who has been loyal to the organization.

    If you think about it as adding $2M to Burakovsky's salary it kinda hits home a bit. Would you sign Bura for $6.9M (possibly more when his deal is up)? That's kinda what's happening in a sense.

    I do get your point of view on this, but I really fear the repercussions outweigh the benefits, especially if the team can just sign Iafallo or someone to replace Burky. I also think Johnson waives though and we don't need to worry about it.


    As I said they're trying to build that rep but it IS a business and EJ knows that. I also think that's why he waives because if he can play on after the big cap hit he will likely want to finish with the Avs and maybe take a small salary to be a 'mentor' for a while.

    Burakovsky at 7 is likely about the money imo going forward if it's a long term deal and they decide to re-sign him.
    Anus_McLeod and DirtyDangle liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll