SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wild

Created by: MatthewsDynasty
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 18, 2021
Published: Mar. 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MIN
  1. Brooks, Adam
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. 2021 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Wild get a much needed center who brings a lot of speed to the lineup and can play on the PK and PP
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,574,741$0$0-$74,741
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$874,125$874,125
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,050,000$1,050,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:52 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Yeah this is just not realistic, & reality in anywhere, ir any kind of way

Wild aren't trading foligno , greenway for kerfoot

Come on now. Like you can't actually believe this is anything?

Kerfoot isn't a c, & nothing more than bottom 6c wild don't need

Greenway alone us with more than a 1st

So not, there no way in shape this is happening
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 192
Quoting: Wildnochance
Yeah this is just not realistic, & reality in anywhere, ir any kind of way

Wild aren't trading foligno , greenway for kerfoot

Come on now. Like you can't actually believe this is anything?

Kerfoot isn't a c, & nothing more than bottom 6c wild don't need

Greenway alone us with more than a 1st

So not, there no way in shape this is happening


How is kerf not a C
Mar. 18, 2021 at 12:56 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: MatthewsDynasty
How is kerf not a C


Dude kerfoot isn't a c that's a fact
Your own team plays him in wing.

Thay you post this Unfair, unrealistic proposal.

Jordan greenway, wild team leading scorer, & 1st like winger whose been dynamic isn't going anywhere especially for this comical proposal

You have posted the worst proposals for wild players on here

Foligno is injured, even if he wasn't, he's not going anywhere. Wild just gave him a 3 years extension in January

So no thanks from wild
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 192
Quoting: Wildnochance
Dude kerfoot isn't a c that's a fact
Your own team plays him in wing.

Thay you post this Unfair, unrealistic proposal.

Jordan greenway, wild team leading scorer, & 1st like winger whose been dynamic isn't going anywhere especially for this comical proposal

You have posted the worst proposals for wild players on here

Foligno is injured, even if he wasn't, he's not going anywhere. Wild just gave him a 3 years extension in January

So no thanks from wild


Bruh look at the lines today... He is playing 3c and is also very good in a top 6 role at wing
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:04 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: MatthewsDynasty
Bruh look at the lines today... He is playing 3c and is also very good in a top 6 role at wing


Okay wild don't need him. Wild don't need anymore bottom c. He also plays better on wing

Your proposal for wild players including this one is comically bad
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:08 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
I assume Foligno is a non-starter for the Wild but Greenway could be had. I don't mind the idea of Kerfoot for Greenway, it does probably depend on what comes back with him though.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:20 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 986
I'd much rather not downgrade our wingers (and team in general) for another 3C, thank you
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:21 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: jnowariak
I assume Foligno is a non-starter for the Wild but Greenway could be had. I don't mind the idea of Kerfoot for Greenway, it does probably depend on what comes back with him though.


Kerfoot doesn't do much for me. He's more of the same: another 3rd line player. I'd rather have Greenway personally
jnowariak liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:29 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Kerfoot doesn't do much for me. He's more of the same: another 3rd line player. I'd rather have Greenway personally


I go back and forth on it. He's more flexible lineup wise than Greenway and if you're gonna lose him to expansion I don't hate the idea of getting a little something something for him. At the end of the day though I think you see where the season lands and see if somebody wants to buy high in the offseason before expansion.

I don't think he should be considered untouchable by any stretch of the imagination.
TanSor liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: jnowariak
I go back and forth on it. He's more flexible lineup wise than Greenway and if you're gonna lose him to expansion I don't hate the idea of getting a little something something for him. At the end of the day though I think you see where the season lands and see if somebody wants to buy high in the offseason before expansion.

I don't think he should be considered untouchable by any stretch of the imagination.


Definitely agree that I'm fine with moving Greenway for the right price, I just don't think Kerfoot is the right price. But you bring up a good point, Kerfoot is more versatile
jnowariak liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:37 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: TanSor
Definitely agree that I'm fine with moving Greenway for the right price, I just don't think Kerfoot is the right price. But you bring up a good point, Kerfoot is more versatile


If it happened in season, which I assume OP is proposing, we would need a similar caliber roster player back. If they offered a 1st and Kerfoot for Greenway before the deadline, IDK how you turn that down.
TanSor liked this.
Mar. 18, 2021 at 1:47 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: jnowariak
If it happened in season, which I assume OP is proposing, we would need a similar caliber roster player back. If they offered a 1st and Kerfoot for Greenway before the deadline, IDK how you turn that down.


Kerfoot: https://www.nhl.com/player/alexander-kerfoot-8477021

Greenway: https://www.nhl.com/player/jordan-greenway-8478413

You don't ruin team chemistry, don'truin team, or trade greenway for kerfoot and 1st.

What's to say wild don't pay Seattle to take soucy? It has always seemed with soucy'a contract that wild plan on converting Seattle to take him
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll