SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

anotha one

Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 20, 2021
Published: Mar. 20, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
A few trades to fix the scoring issue as well as some minor help on D. Four scoring lines that can skate, three D-pairs with some aggression and puck-moving ability. Expansion protection after this season would be: Bergeron, Marchand, Pastrnak, Coyle, DeBrusk, Smith, Frederic; McAvoy, Carlo, Grzelcyk; Rask
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Oleksiak, Jamie
Additional Details:
Replaces some of the size lost from Chara in the offseason and Carlo's concussion. Can play either side and is a pending UFA, so he doesn't affect the expansion draft at all.
DAL
  1. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. McKenzie, Curtis
  2. Schwartz, Jaden ($2,675,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Sell high on Ritchie by sending him to a team that needs help on the PP. Schwartz adds 5v5 scoring to a team that badly needs it and is another pending UFA. McKenzie adds some depth to the depleted P-Bruins.
STL
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. Terry, Troy
Additional Details:
Apparently Terry is on the block in Anaheim, he's a solid secondary scorer who could play up and down the lineup if needed.
ANA
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. 2022 4th round pick (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Palmieri, Kyle ($1,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Long been rumored to be heading to Boston. Palmieri is one of the best 5v5 scorers available on the market, right behind Rakell and Forsberg who are probably too expensive for Boston to acquire. Vaak has become somewhat expendable due to Zboril and Lauzon both playing well, Ahcan playing well in the AHL, and Lohrei dominating the USHL. Little bit of retention so Boston can stay cap compliant.
NJD
  1. Senyshyn, Zach
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,425,056$964,222$2,407,500$3,074,944
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,675,000$2,675,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,325,000$1,325,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,137,500$2,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000 ($275,000$275K$275,000$275K)
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000 ($1,675,000$2M$1,675,000$2M)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 20, 2021 at 12:16 p.m.
#1
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,191
Likes: 11,322
So wait... you think the Blues would boost their PP by trading Schwartz away to gain Ritchie (to say nothing of the monstrous gulf in their 5v5 worth)? I find it hard to believe anyone could imagine this trade is reasonable. Which is odd, because the other offers are at least in the ballpark or better.
Mar. 20, 2021 at 12:47 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 522
St. Louis probably says no, but I think I’d rather not do that trade anyways and risk losing Ritchie to Seattle and keep our pick and Lauko who’s looked fantastic in the AHL. Every other trade is good. Protect Terry over Smith.
Mar. 20, 2021 at 12:47 p.m.
#3
Mysteryman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 888
Likes: 340
Quoting: mokumboi
So wait... you think the Blues would boost their PP by trading Schwartz away to gain Ritchie (to say nothing of the monstrous gulf in their 5v5 worth)? I find it hard to believe anyone could imagine this trade is reasonable. Which is odd, because the other offers are at least in the ballpark or better.



Ritchie is the 3rd piece in the deal. The trade is somewhat solid, the logic in the explanation is not.

That being said. Blues decline, if they were selling they could likely do better. Better off extending him though.
Mar. 20, 2021 at 12:49 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 352
Likes: 14
Quoting: mokumboi
So wait... you think the Blues would boost their PP by trading Schwartz away to gain Ritchie (to say nothing of the monstrous gulf in their 5v5 worth)? I find it hard to believe anyone could imagine this trade is reasonable. Which is odd, because the other offers are at least in the ballpark or better.


Admittedly any trade involving Ritchie would be an attempt to pull the wool over another GM's eyes, so to speak. No, Ritchie isn't very good at 5v5, but maybe another GM that values power forwards and whose team needs help on the PP could be convinced to swap one of their middle 6 forwards for Ritchie. To be fair though, Schwartz is likely to walk in the offseason and the Blues would still get a decent prospect and 1st out of this trade, as well as the opportunity to keep Ritchie beyond this season if he plays well.
Mar. 20, 2021 at 12:52 p.m.
#5
Mysteryman
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 888
Likes: 340
Bjork and Terry are the basically same player. Just opposite shots. A straight swap of the two and a change of scenery and new opportunity would do both of them good. But i’d imagine the Ducks would want a pick or a young d man instead.
Mar. 20, 2021 at 2:18 p.m.
#6
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,191
Likes: 11,322
Quoting: Userunknown
Ritchie is the 3rd piece in the deal. The trade is somewhat solid, the logic in the explanation is not.

That being said. Blues decline, if they were selling they could likely do better. Better off extending him though.


The trade only so much as approaches solid if the Blues are set for a total teardown rebuild. In the current context, it's pure lunacy. Your second set of sentences is spot on, though.


Quoting: Bruins52
Admittedly any trade involving Ritchie would be an attempt to pull the wool over another GM's eyes, so to speak.

No, Ritchie isn't very good at 5v5, but maybe another GM that values power forwards and whose team needs help on the PP could be convinced to swap one of their middle 6 forwards for Ritchie. To be fair though,

Schwartz is likely to walk in the offseason and the Blues would still get a decent prospect and 1st out of this trade, as well as the opportunity to keep Ritchie beyond this season if he plays well.



1- Exactly.

2- The Blues PP has been humming after they started the season in a slump. I'm not sure how you think it needs so much help as to give into this swindle. They have two strong units+ already. And plenty of "power forward" types, with more on the way.

3- No idea how you got that idea. His extension is in the works now and will probably be done before the playoffs arrive.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll