Quoting: Capitalfail67
i said hes a 2 OR 3 c on most NHL teams.... you keep focusing on the 2c which is only half of what i actually said.
"Dude your reading comprehension is horrible. It was to show that points don't mean much when evaluating a player. Like jesus it's not that hard to understand. Staal has been on a stark decline the last 2 years. Anyone with a brain can see that. Just because he had 52 points in 80 games and 47 points in 66 games doesn't tell me much."
buddy name ONE name ONE!!! 3c that had 47 points last year? Points dont mean much? so a guy that scores 120 points and a g uy that scores 40 points are on equal playing grounds since points dont matter....? lmfao there are other factors but my main point is that 47 points is great for bottom 6 players and even solid for most 2c in the NHL. stop being stupid its not that hard to understand the value in points lol
"Me No LiKe PoInTs... Me tHiNk ShEaRy w CrOsBy Is ThE sAmE aS sTaAl On ThE wIlD" underlying numbers are important but points are just as important.. not rocket science
> i said hes a 2 OR 3 c on most NHL teams.... you keep focusing on the 2c which is only half of what i actually said.
You said 2C...and you are completely wrong. You could've said 3C/4C but you didn't.
> buddy name ONE name ONE!!! 3c that had 47 points last year? Points dont mean much? so a guy that scores 120 points and a g uy that scores 40 points are on equal playing grounds since points dont matter....? lmfao there are other factors but my main point is that 47 points is great for bottom 6 players and even solid for most 2c in the NHL. stop being stupid its not that hard to understand the value in points lol
Staal was playing on the 1st PP, the 1st line, and playing 17 minutes a game. What 3C is getting that kind of usage? What a horrible counter lmao. Didn't really think about that one did ya?
> so a guy that scores 120 points and a g uy that scores 40 points are on equal playing grounds since points dont matter
Amazing how you got "a guy that scores 120 points and a g uy that scores 40 points are on equal playing grounds" out of me saying points don't mean much when evaluating a player. Your whole argument is how many points Staal has and that's it. You literally ignore everything else. Now all you do is straw man because your argument is garbage and so is your hockey IQ.
> 47 points is great for bottom 6 players
Backpedaling hard. I literally called him a bottom 6 guy and you got triggered. Now you're calling him one LMAO.
> "Me No LiKe PoInTs... Me tHiNk ShEaRy w CrOsBy Is ThE sAmE aS sTaAl On ThE wIlD" underlying numbers are important but points are just as important.. not rocket science
No points aren't as important. Look up empty calorie points. Just because you're getting "points" doesn't mean you're doing much to help your team. You can be piling up meaningless secondary assists while being a complete negative to your team. Try using your brain for once.