Quoting: gortonsfishsticks27
Aren't you just pushing the problem to the other lines then? I think it'll win a game here and there, but the team won't dominate the way they were before. Don't get me wrong, I don't like komarov near the top line. But even with the lineup you proposed, I can't see them winning the way they did before.
No because barzal is by far the best offensive player on the team - giving him two competent wingers gives you the best chance to win. At the beginning of the season they were winning games only because the 1st line was producing.
Beau-barzal-eberle outscored the opposition 27-16 when they were a line a few years back. Every time beau is with barzal he scores a t a high rate. Plus he’s the best defensive winger on the team. It makes too much sense.
Wahlstrom has been the isles best player over the last month. Giving him more ice time with better center would probably be a good idea. No doubt pageau is a solid 3C, but he’s a defensive minded center with a great shot. Nelson is better at driving play offensively and he has better puck skills than pageau, he’d work better with wahlstrom IMO.
The 3rd line is pretty much the same type of line we had in the playoffs (brass-pageau-komarov) - czarnik plays a similar style to brass and that line can be a defensive line that chips in offensively every couple of games.
Overall they 2 scoring lines and two bottom 6 lines that can shut down opposing teams and chip in offensively. Its a lot better than having 0 scoring lines, which is what we have now. Komarov neuters barzal and beau-Nelson-bailey is deployed as a shutdown line for some reason. Bailey has regressed and has no chemistry with beau, that line has the lowest goals per 60 min among all lines with 100 min+