SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

additions

Created by: MatthewsDynasty
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 30, 2021
Published: Mar. 30, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Laughton, Scott
  2. 2021 6th round pick (PHI)
2.
TOR
  1. Oleksiak, Jamie ($500,000 retained)
DAL
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the PHI
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$80,887,241$0$0$612,759
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,637,500$1,637,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$874,125$874,125
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$805,833$805,833 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:11 a.m.
#1
PULL A TAMPA IGNORE
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 690
Doubt Dallas is a seller think they try to get the first round rematch of last years Final
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:15 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
We would want picks for Laughton, not a contract with term back.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:30 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Doesn;t move the switch for Philly. Philly has better options at forward, so would need a 2nd and more.

I like kerfoot, who is a quality 3rd liner, but hes an offensive 3rd liner and not good enough for top 6 play, hes not physical, cant win faceoffs, not good two way. Laughton is all those things and wold be a good acquisition for TOR, but dont think that return is anything PHI wants.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:33 a.m.
#4
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: DirtyDangles
We would want picks for Laughton, not a contract with term back.


Quoting: Hammerwise
Doesn;t move the switch for Philly. Philly has better options at forward, so would need a 2nd and more.

I like kerfoot, who is a quality 3rd liner, but hes an offensive 3rd liner and not good enough for top 6 play, hes not physical, cant win faceoffs, not good two way. Laughton is all those things and wold be a good acquisition for TOR, but dont think that return is anything PHI wants.


What kind of picks are we talking about? Would love to have Laughton wear blue and white.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:38 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: Ritzy
What kind of picks are we talking about? Would love to have Laughton wear blue and white.


He's exactly what you need: plays 3 postions, wins faceoffs, two way, gritty, phsyical and produces. I would think a 2nd and 3rd (even a yr away, in 2022) might do it, but with retention, maybe a prospect and a 2nd.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:42 a.m.
#6
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Hammerwise
He's exactly what you need: plays 3 postions, wins faceoffs, two way, gritty, phsyical and produces. I would think a 2nd and 3rd (even a yr away, in 2022) might do it, but with retention, maybe a prospect and a 2nd.


SDA + 2022 2nd round pick for Laughton at 50%? Different prospect in mind?
Hammerwise liked this.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:51 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 192
Quoting: Ritzy
SDA + 2022 2nd round pick for Laughton at 50%? Different prospect in mind?


Too much for a rental
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:53 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: Ritzy
SDA + 2022 2nd round pick for Laughton at 50%? Different prospect in mind?


About right, although i dont think SDA is all that good a prospect or what PHI would desire, maybe a Hallander, maybe even a Sandin. Laughton is still young, inexpensive and has oodles of value for a 3rd line UFA. Between UFA possible deadline forwards of laughton, granlund, I think laughton carries more value
Mar. 30, 2021 at 9:54 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Ritzy
What kind of picks are we talking about? Would love to have Laughton wear blue and white.


Probably a 1st or a 2nd and 3rd
Hammerwise liked this.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 10:01 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Hammerwise
About right, although i dont think SDA is all that good a prospect or what PHI would desire, maybe a Hallander, maybe even a Sandin. Laughton is still young, inexpensive and has oodles of value for a 3rd line UFA. Between UFA possible deadline forwards of laughton, granlund, I think laughton carries more value


Come on now, a deadline rental doesn't get you a prospect like Sandin. This is silly. A 2nd is an overpay for Laughton. Add a 3rd down the road for retention.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 10:11 a.m.
#11
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Hammerwise
About right, although i dont think SDA is all that good a prospect or what PHI would desire, maybe a Hallander, maybe even a Sandin. Laughton is still young, inexpensive and has oodles of value for a 3rd line UFA. Between UFA possible deadline forwards of laughton, granlund, I think laughton carries more value


Think it is a bit of a stretch for Sandin. I think it was you who posted another Leafs/Philly thread that included Laughton. Think the deal was a 2nd and 3rd for Laughton? That's likely what the deal would end up being.

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Probably a 1st or a 2nd and 3rd


If there is retention, I'm game.

Quoting: MatthewsDynasty
Too much for a rental


It really isn't to be honest with you. MON just paid a 3rd and 5th for Staal with retention. Laughton is much younger and provides the type of play that the Leafs need right now. We have a few wing prospects in the pipeline so I am not over concerned with SDA being moved. Maybe make it SDA and a 2022 3rd, but we are nickel and diming at this point.
Hammerwise liked this.
Mar. 30, 2021 at 10:18 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: Ritzy
Think it is a bit of a stretch for Sandin. I think it was you who posted another Leafs/Philly thread that included Laughton. Think the deal was a 2nd and 3rd for Laughton? That's likely what the deal would end up being.



If there is retention, I'm game.



It really isn't to be honest with you. MON just paid a 3rd and 5th for Staal with retention. Laughton is much younger and provides the type of play that the Leafs need right now. We have a few wing prospects in the pipeline so I am not over concerned with SDA being moved. Maybe make it SDA and a 2022 3rd, but we are nickel and diming at this point.


Youre right on alot of levels. And yes I think Laughton gets a 2nd and a 3rd as a trade deadline rental. Without going insane, thats a pretty meh deal as the picks are low. I think retention is always worth something, so my initial idea of Laughton being worth a 2nd and 3rd becaomes bigger, if the picks are a year away or retention is added.

Oh yeah, Sandin is an Leaf overpayment, but it comes down to how close the team thinks it is, what it needs and whatever prospect they think has value but ultimately not in Toronto.

I think I started with Laughton for a 2nd and 3rd in the 2022 draft, which based on where the leafs should finish and it being a yr away is a pretty weak TOR offer. Adding retention on PHIs side might be needed, but its almost an insult on the weak offer, so something else has to give. ( SDA and a 2021 2nd, as I said probably pretty close, but I just dont see SDA as all that good or something PHI lacks.)

As for Staal, hes ancient, slow, one dimensional and playing pretty poorly at the moment, I think its a pretty weak deal for MTL and BUF.
Ritzy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll