SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fine well take Turris

Created by: sedin33
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 31, 2021
Published: Mar. 31, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
VAN
  1. McLeod, Ryan
  2. Turris, Kyle ($750,000 retained)
  3. 2021 4th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Trade is Sutter @ 50% for 4th
EDM
  1. Sutter, Brandon ($2,187,500 retained)
Additional Details:
Trade is Turris (750K retained) + McLeod -- salary dump
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$79,615,212$1,700,000$1,132,500$1,884,788
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,550,000$2,550,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$834,167$834,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,300,000$4,300,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000 ($4,925,000$5M$4,925,000$5M)
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:28 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 139
Likes: 26
no way edmonton give up mcleod for that. He is a beats in the ahl right now and they would rather keep turris i thnik
Rooney, sedin33 and CD282 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:29 a.m.
#2
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,407
Likes: 4,144
Can't see EDM making this trade especially with the way McLeod has been playing in the AHL. Is Sutter really THAT big of an upgrade on Turris? I'd rather just keep Turris as depth for next year and hang onto the pick and McLeod.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:35 a.m.
#3
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
This entire deal makes no sense.

You say moving Sutter at 50% retained is equal to a 4th round pick (basically a cap dump), but then the price to move Turris who's deal is less at $1.65M but just has an extra year of control costs a good prospect? Both contracts have roughly the same amount of real money left on them so there's no economically value to either side either. You could make a good argument that Sutter retained at 50% straight up for Turris is equal value as it is. Sutter being the slightly better player, but Turris having more team control. But the difference is far from a prospect like McLeod.
CD282 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:41 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Hockey_Nerd
This entire deal makes no sense.

You say moving Sutter at 50% retained is equal to a 4th round pick (basically a cap dump), but then the price to move Turris who's deal is less at $1.65M but just has an extra year of control costs a good prospect? Both contracts have roughly the same amount of real money left on them so there's no economically value to either side either. You could make a good argument that Sutter retained at 50% straight up for Turris is equal value as it is. Sutter being the slightly better player, but Turris having more team control. But the difference is far from a prospect like McLeod.


I can't believe how wrong this post is. First, Sutter is on an expiring deal with one month remaining in the season. He isn't a cap dump. Edmonton is rumored to be very interested in him. The rumored deal is Sutter at 50% for a 4th.

Second, Vancouver is a cap team and doesn't have any room this year and not projected to have any room next year and DOESN'T WANT OR NEED TURRIS. To help Edmonton, we could take Turris at 900K for a B prospect. Maybe insert a different prospect, but the point is the same.

Vancouver would be happy to trade Sutter @ 50% for the 4th.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:49 a.m.
#5
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: sedin33
I can't believe how wrong this post is. First, Sutter is on an expiring deal with one month remaining in the season. He isn't a cap dump. Edmonton is rumored to be very interested in him. The rumored deal is Sutter at 50% for a 4th.

Second, Vancouver is a cap team and doesn't have any room this year and not projected to have any room next year and DOESN'T WANT OR NEED TURRIS. To help Edmonton, we could take Turris at 900K for a B prospect. Maybe insert a different prospect, but the point is the same.

Vancouver would be happy to trade Sutter @ 50% for the 4th.


Is Sutter worth his $4.375M AAV contract? No. Are you trading him with retention on his deal? Yes. Are you acquiring any salary or good prospects back in the deal? No. --- that my friend, is the exact definition of a cap dump.

I'm not saying that Edmonton isn't interested in Sutter, all I was saying is that your trade logic is terrible. Turris isn't a cap dump when they can bury 65% of his contract in the minors or taxi squad (they can send him down and only anything over $1.075M counts against the cap - making his cap hit $575K which is less than a league minimum contract). & that is not worth a B prospect who has shown a ton of progression in his game. Regardless if Vancouver wants Turris or not. If they don't want him, don't acquire him. Edmonton could maneuver around the cap without moving Turris. Which goes back to my original point that your trade logic is terrible.
Bringer_Of_Snow and arab05 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:49 a.m.
#6
The Spawn is back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 1,068
Turris isn't covering the bet of his 2 year deal, but he is pretty cheap, not a big problem (on taxi/buried he costs about 500k). Definitely not a big enough problem to require trading McLeod, who is looking great and could easily end up in Edmonton's bottom 6 next season, at a cheap cost.

Sutter add would be fine, but there are cheaper other options out there that require less cap wrangling.
sedin33, oilersguy, Bringer_Of_Snow and 2 others liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 11:50 a.m.
#7
Ouch
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 540
Quoting: sedin33
I can't believe how wrong this post is. First, Sutter is on an expiring deal with one month remaining in the season. He isn't a cap dump. Edmonton is rumored to be very interested in him. The rumored deal is Sutter at 50% for a 4th.

Second, Vancouver is a cap team and doesn't have any room this year and not projected to have any room next year and DOESN'T WANT OR NEED TURRIS. To help Edmonton, we could take Turris at 900K for a B prospect. Maybe insert a different prospect, but the point is the same.

Vancouver would be happy to trade Sutter @ 50% for the 4th.


Even if none of Turris' salary was retained its so low a B prospect to move him is to much. Plus McLeod is an above average prospect right now, whom is projected to take the 3rd line center position as soon as need season. Sutter at 50% IF the Oilers can find room works but if not it's not worth losing a good prospect over. If a deal can't be made the Oilers have 3 other players they are pursuing
sedin33 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:09 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Hockey_Nerd
Is Sutter worth his $4.375M AAV contract? No. Are you trading him with retention on his deal? Yes. Are you acquiring any salary or good prospects back in the deal? No. --- that my friend, is the exact definition of a cap dump.

I'm not saying that Edmonton isn't interested in Sutter, all I was saying is that your trade logic is terrible. Turris isn't a cap dump when they can bury 65% of his contract in the minors or taxi squad (they can send him down and only anything over $1.075M counts against the cap - making his cap hit $575K which is less than a league minimum contract). & that is not worth a B prospect who has shown a ton of progression in his game. Regardless if Vancouver wants Turris or not. If they don't want him, don't acquire him. Edmonton could maneuver around the cap without moving Turris. Which goes back to my original point that your trade logic is terrible.


Quoting: JmoneyTalk
Even if none of Turris' salary was retained its so low a B prospect to move him is to much. Plus McLeod is an above average prospect right now, whom is projected to take the 3rd line center position as soon as need season. Sutter at 50% IF the Oilers can find room works but if not it's not worth losing a good prospect over. If a deal can't be made the Oilers have 3 other players they are pursuing


Hockey Nerd. Sutter has 1 month remaining on his contract and Vancouver is not making the playoffs. There is no need to dump the salary. I'm not sure why that is difficult for you to understand.

Jmoney, fair point. As I said, it could be any B level prospect not necessarily McLeod.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:29 p.m.
#9
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: sedin33
Hockey Nerd. Sutter has 1 month remaining on his contract and Vancouver is not making the playoffs. There is no need to dump the salary. I'm not sure why that is difficult for you to understand.


I'm not so sure why it's so difficult for you to understand that Sutter is not worth his contract, you're retaining on his deal, and you aren't getting anything significant back - the definition of a cap dump. Edmonton doesn't even have to move Turris to fit Sutter in, so even more reason for Edmonton to NOT include Turris as a "cap dump" as you're saying, while having to also give Vancouver a solid prospect for no reason. Just because you're the one making the deal and clearly not making playoffs doesn't mean that every other team has to help you out. Think of this deal from the other side, if you were an Edmonton fan and not a Vancouver fan.. you'd be outraged to give up a top prospect. It's not just about your favourite team's need, it has to work for both sides. & this trade has no logic to it at all.
CD282 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:35 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Hockey_Nerd
I'm not so sure why it's so difficult for you to understand that Sutter is not worth his contract, you're retaining on his deal, and you aren't getting anything significant back - the definition of a cap dump. Edmonton doesn't even have to move Turris to fit Sutter in, so even more reason for Edmonton to NOT include Turris as a "cap dump" as you're saying, while having to also give Vancouver a solid prospect for no reason. Just because you're the one making the deal and clearly not making playoffs doesn't mean that every other team has to help you out. Think of this deal from the other side, if you were an Edmonton fan and not a Vancouver fan.. you'd be outraged to give up a top prospect. It's not just about your favourite team's need, it has to work for both sides. & this trade has no logic to it at all.


I'll explain this very simply to you. Vancouver doesn't need to move Sutter. His contract expires in a month! He is only being traded because someone wants him. Therefore, he is not a cap dump. A cap dump is a team that needs to unload a salary. By definition Vancouver doesn't need to do that.

You confusing this with Turris. Vancouver doesn't need nor want him and more importantly can't afford him. However, Oilers' fans keep adding him to a Sutter deal. The post is a response to the multiple trade proposals for Sutter that include Turris. The only way we would take Turris is outlined.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:42 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Why would Edmonton trade McLeod and retain $750k just to move Turris? You know that they can just bury him in the AHL and it only costs them $525k, right? So this deal costs them more AND they lose a good prospect. Dumb.
sedin33 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:50 p.m.
#12
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: sedin33
I'll explain this very simply to you. Vancouver doesn't need to move Sutter. His contract expires in a month! He is only being traded because someone wants him. Therefore, he is not a cap dump. A cap dump is a team that needs to unload a salary. By definition Vancouver doesn't need to do that.

You confusing this with Turris. Vancouver doesn't need nor want him and more importantly can't afford him. However, Oilers' fans keep adding him to a Sutter deal. The post is a response to the multiple trade proposals for Sutter that include Turris. The only way we would take Turris is outlined.


& I'll explain this the clearest anyone can make something:

You're trade logic is terrible.
CD282 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:57 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Hockey_Nerd
& I'll explain this the clearest anyone can make something:

You're trade logic is terrible.


You're new to this forum wish you the best of luck here, but I'm not interested in engaging with you again. Blocked
Mar. 31, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.
#14
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: sedin33
You're new to this forum wish you the best of luck here, but I'm not interested in engaging with you again. Blocked


Cool? .. I'm sorry your feelings are hurt that you can't have a debate about hockey without taking it personally. That's called being a grown up. When I see more likes on my comments and every other comment telling you your trade is far off, to me that doesn't say that I'm wrong here or have done anything wrong at all. But if you wish to take it personally, go ahead. We all grow up sometime! Take care!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll