SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

enough

Created by: Wildfan24
Team: 2020-21 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 31, 2021
Published: Mar. 31, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MIN
  1. Monahan, Sean ($1,375,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Rask, Victor
  2. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
  3. 2022 4th round pick (MIN)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$80,914,424$0$925,000$585,576
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,100,000$4,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$733,333$733,333 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:30 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
No thanks
Wildfan24 and flamesfan liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:31 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: Gmonwy
No thanks


what has to change or be added?
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:33 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
No
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:45 p.m.
#4
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 984
have any wild fans thought about making a package for garland+Dvorak? I imagine a top 6C and top 6W would be worth like a greenway/dumba combo or something. Just throwing it out there. Seems like it might fit bettter for wild fants than going after a Monahan
Wildfan24, jnowariak and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:46 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
can flames fans have a conversation not just a single word?? let's have a conversation about what needs to be added. isn't that what this site about? 2 comments and both no. sorry first was no thanks
Rooney, OldNYIfan and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:48 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: Lightman13
have any wild fans thought about making a package for garland+Dvorak? I imagine a top 6C and top 6W would be worth like a greenway/dumba combo or something. Just throwing it out there. Seems like it might fit bettter for wild fants than going after a Monahan


I think the requirements for garland and dvorak would be alot higher then getting Monahan. wild don't want to sell all the future and picks for players yet. I think what ever the Flames do with Monahan they will be getting less then fans think
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:51 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildfan24
what has to change or be added?


I would say they’d want another prospect or pick, which I don’t think is out of line. The problem here, as with moving a Dumba or another player with term, probably isn’t the assets you give up to get them but the locking in of salary in a flat cap. If I had to wager on why BG wasn’t interested in Monahan, it’s because it locks him in for 3 more years at a cap hit above what he’s worth. Not so much that he wouldn’t fill a need.
OldNYIfan, TanSor and Wildfan24 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
#8
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 1,413
well i think you have to look at what players like coleman got in his trade. He had 1 year left and got a top prospect from tampa and a decent 1st round pick since it was vancouvers over tampa. You're sending a weaker package than that and want a player who's better. minny would have to add a top prospect to start i'd say then go from there
Wildfan24 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:54 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,210
Likes: 2,510
Quoting: Wildfan24
what has to change or be added?


This looks like an overpaid good 4C, 1st, 4th for a very good 2C paid the same. Rask has never lived up to his contract and I get that he is playing his best in god knows how long but a 30 game stint doesn’t give him value at this point in his career. He’s more of a pay a bottom feeder picks for the cap space type of guy. You’d have to retain and add greenway to actually make this deal happen and I haven’t even looked at what players would be subject to draft protection so it likely doesn’t work regardless
Wildfan24 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:54 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: jnowariak
I would say they’d want another prospect or pick, which I don’t think is out of line. The problem here, as with moving a Dumba or another player with term, probably isn’t the assets you give up to get them but the locking in of salary in a flat cap. If I had to wager on why BG wasn’t interested in Monahan, it’s because it locks him in for 3 more years at a cap hit above what he’s worth. Not so much that he wouldn’t fill a need.


totally get it all. sorta why i added rask he has a year left which isn't the same but still kinda helps for next year. I'd lower the pick to a 3rd and maybe a b c prospect. I was thinking the only reason calgary wouldn't accept would be the retaining of salary.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:55 p.m.
#11
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 1,413
Quoting: jnowariak
I would say they’d want another prospect or pick, which I don’t think is out of line. The problem here, as with moving a Dumba or another player with term, probably isn’t the assets you give up to get them but the locking in of salary in a flat cap. If I had to wager on why BG wasn’t interested in Monahan, it’s because it locks him in for 3 more years at a cap hit above what he’s worth. Not so much that he wouldn’t fill a need.


I'd argue monahan is worth 3 years at 5 mil, he's hit 30 goals multiple times
jnowariak, Wildfan24 and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:56 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Lightman13
have any wild fans thought about making a package for garland+Dvorak? I imagine a top 6C and top 6W would be worth like a greenway/dumba combo or something. Just throwing it out there. Seems like it might fit bettter for wild fants than going after a Monahan


I don’t think the yotes want to move either of those guys unless it was for a massive overpay. They can afford to resign Garland and I don’t think they’re as far off as they look. I just wonder how they feel about it. I do think that could be a good home for Menell though.
Lightman13, OldNYIfan and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:57 p.m.
#13
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 984
Quoting: Wildfan24
I think the requirements for garland and dvorak would be alot higher then getting Monahan. wild don't want to sell all the future and picks for players yet. I think what ever the Flames do with Monahan they will be getting less then fans think


Maybe, but Guerin doesn’t have any interest in Monahan. Calgary asked about him for dumba straight up and the wild said no. Probably because he doesn’t play defense really. That’s one reason I look at Dvorak and garland. I don’t think greenway has any real skill, he’s just 6’6 and would rather have garland to play with fiala or kaprizov. I think they’d fit the long term plan better. But that’s just me.
Wildfan24 and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 12:59 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I'd argue monahan is worth 3 years at 5 mil, he's hit 30 goals multiple times


Sorry, didn’t see the retention. I don’t think there is anyway CGY retains, the whole point of wanting to move him is more about cap flexibility than anything else. I know he’s out those numbers up but I’m just not sold on his game.
ArakinSkywalker and TanSor liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 1:14 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: Lightman13
Maybe, but Guerin doesn’t have any interest in Monahan. Calgary asked about him for dumba straight up and the wild said no. Probably because he doesn’t play defense really. That’s one reason I look at Dvorak and garland. I don’t think greenway has any real skill, he’s just 6’6 and would rather have garland to play with fiala or kaprizov. I think they’d fit the long term plan better. But that’s just me.


I think guerin might have interest if the asking isn't dumba. if you could get him for a reasonable offer that's not destroying the plan or farm team I think he would entertain a deal. that's sorta with my deal wild aren't losing out on drafting they still have there own picks. giving up a player with a year left
Lightman13 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 3:49 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildfan24
totally get it all. sorta why i added rask he has a year left which isn't the same but still kinda helps for next year. I'd lower the pick to a 3rd and maybe a b c prospect. I was thinking the only reason calgary wouldn't accept would be the retaining of salary.


The other problem here is that we will need Dumba’s cap space in the last year of his deal, so we don’t really solve a problem as much as kick it down the road. I really think if you want a center to play today, you look to Strome in CHI. He’s not gonna score 30 goals and he’s not gonna drive play but with the wingers we have, he will make the top 6 very dangerous given his vision and passing. All of that is coupled with the fact he’s half the cap hit of Monahan, maintains team control, and would cost less in a trade makes him a much more appropriate target IMO.
Lightman13 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 4:07 p.m.
#17
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 984
Quoting: jnowariak
The other problem here is that we will need Dumba’s cap space in the last year of his deal, so we don’t really solve a problem as much as kick it down the road. I really think if you want a center to play today, you look to Strome in CHI. He’s not gonna score 30 goals and he’s not gonna drive play but with the wingers we have, he will make the top 6 very dangerous given his vision and passing. All of that is coupled with the fact he’s half the cap hit of Monahan, maintains team control, and would cost less in a trade makes him a much more appropriate target IMO.


Can’t deny any of that.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 4:10 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Lightman13
Can’t deny any of that.


With Boldy signed, I don’t know how you don’t try to flip Greenway for Strome. Cap needs to be worked out but his addition to the top 6 immediately changes the complexion of this team in a way Greenway never will.
OldNYIfan and Lightman13 liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 7:54 p.m.
#19
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 984
Quoting: jnowariak
With Boldy signed, I don’t know how you don’t try to flip Greenway for Strome. Cap needs to be worked out but his addition to the top 6 immediately changes the complexion of this team in a way Greenway never will.


Right? But they are starting boldy in Iowa. I assume in the next 2 weeks if he lights it up they’ll look at moving greenway before the tdl. At least that would make sense since some teams would pay quite the penny for him in the playoffs.
jnowariak liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 8:32 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: jnowariak
The other problem here is that we will need Dumba’s cap space in the last year of his deal, so we don’t really solve a problem as much as kick it down the road. I really think if you want a center to play today, you look to Strome in CHI. He’s not gonna score 30 goals and he’s not gonna drive play but with the wingers we have, he will make the top 6 very dangerous given his vision and passing. All of that is coupled with the fact he’s half the cap hit of Monahan, maintains team control, and would cost less in a trade makes him a much more appropriate target IMO.


sorry man don't mean to sound stupid but what do you mean we need dumbas cap space in the final year?
jnowariak liked this.
Mar. 31, 2021 at 9:42 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildfan24
sorry man don't mean to sound stupid but what do you mean we need dumbas cap space in the final year?


No worries, I spend way too much time thinking about this. The Wild will be on the hook for Parise/Suter/Zuccarello on aging deals worth about 25% of available cap space. Kaprizov, Fiala, and Ek will take up another 25% of the cap. Once you take out Foligno, Brodin, and Spurgeon that leaves you with 25 mil in cap space to sign 11 players, some of which will need to be top 6 forwards and a top 4 d man. That doesn’t include new more lucrative contracts for Addison, Kahokanen, and Greenway.

It’s not that we can’t hold on to Dumba through his contract but it severely limits our ability to sign a top 6 C during the time we look to start really going for a playoff run. And take into consideration that it’s very unlikely all of the guys will be here in 2 years of that Parise/Suter ends up on LTIR, but you can only plan with what you know. Hopefully that wasn’t too long winded and was a tad helpful.

Also, this is all just my opinion so don’t put too much worth into it.
Apr. 1, 2021 at 1:11 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: jnowariak
No worries, I spend way too much time thinking about this. The Wild will be on the hook for Parise/Suter/Zuccarello on aging deals worth about 25% of available cap space. Kaprizov, Fiala, and Ek will take up another 25% of the cap. Once you take out Foligno, Brodin, and Spurgeon that leaves you with 25 mil in cap space to sign 11 players, some of which will need to be top 6 forwards and a top 4 d man. That doesn’t include new more lucrative contracts for Addison, Kahokanen, and Greenway.

It’s not that we can’t hold on to Dumba through his contract but it severely limits our ability to sign a top 6 C during the time we look to start really going for a playoff run. And take into consideration that it’s very unlikely all of the guys will be here in 2 years of that Parise/Suter ends up on LTIR, but you can only plan with what you know. Hopefully that wasn’t too long winded and was a tad helpful.

Also, this is all just my opinion so don’t put too much worth into it.


so your saying we need to trade him right
Apr. 1, 2021 at 8:23 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildfan24
so your saying we need to trade him right


I am. And only because I think that we will need to use that cap space elsewhere to be more competitive. Dumba is playing great and I really like what he does for the community but we’ve got a guy we believe in, Addison, to take his place and we should be able to get some decent assets for him.
Wildfan24 liked this.
Apr. 1, 2021 at 9:50 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 976
Likes: 244
Quoting: jnowariak
I am. And only because I think that we will need to use that cap space elsewhere to be more competitive. Dumba is playing great and I really like what he does for the community but we’ve got a guy we believe in, Addison, to take his place and we should be able to get some decent assets for him.


I read your first comment wrong thats why I was confused lol. I thought you ment as in we need his cap not cap space lol makes so much more sence now
jnowariak liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll