Forums/NHL Signings

Colorado Avalanche signed Alex Newhook (3 Years / $1,491,667 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar 31 at 7:49
#1
Alex Newhook has signed a new contract with the Colorado Avalanche.
ENTRY-LEVEL CONTRACT
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
LENGTH: 3 YEARS
EXPIRY STATUS: RFA
SIGNING TEAM: Colorado AvalancheColorado Avalanche
VALUE: $4,475,000
C.H.% : 1.11
SIGNING DATE: March 31, 2021
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV P. BONUSES S. BONUSES BASE SALARY TOTAL SALARY MINORS SALARY
2020-21$908,333$1,491,667$50,000$92,500$782,500$875,000$70,000
2021-22$908,333$1,491,667$850,000$92,500$832,500$925,000$70,000
2022-23$908,333$1,491,667$850,000$92,500$832,500$925,000$70,000
TOTAL$2,724,999$4,475,001$1,750,000$277,500$2,447,500$2,725,000$210,000
P. BONUS DETAILS: Player can only earn a maximum of $1,300,000 in 'A' bonuses over the course of the contract
Mar 31 at 7:54
#2
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 1,536
Nice they finally signed him.
Mar 31 at 7:55
#3
best poster
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 4,097
a lot of boston college alumni getting paid today
oilersguy liked this.
Mar 31 at 10:40
#4
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
6-12 months he's probably in the NHL
Apr 1 at 12:33
#5
Wqrrior
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 2,353
The guy that should have been getting the Caufield levels of hype is right here.

Newhook > Caufield.
Apr 1 at 1:37
#6
Habs4Ever
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 1,462
Quoting: Wqrrior
The guy that should have been getting the Caufield levels of hype is right here.

Newhook > Caufield.


You really are a Caufield hater
Apr 1 at 9:58
#7
J. Toller
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 507
Likes: 134
The 2 people who said no better have 4 good reasons why this is a bad signing.
Apr 1 at 2:24
#8
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
I can't believe that these cheapskates stiffed the kid out of $50,000 ($16,667 x 3). That's why I voted No.
HabsFan9 liked this.
Apr 1 at 4:00
#9
Club de Hockey 1909
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 664
He'll have one hell of a career. I think he'll be in contention for best Newfoundlander ever.
OldNYIfan and MountRoyal liked this.
Apr 1 at 4:12
#10
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I can't believe that these cheapskates stiffed the kid out of $50,000 ($16,667 x 3). That's why I voted No.


he got more money than Caufield who was drafted ahead of him.
Apr 1 at 4:49
#11
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
he got more money than Caufield who was drafted ahead of him.


And less than every single player drafted after him in the first round who has signed to date. Every single one.
Apr 1 at 4:57
#12
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
And less than every single player drafted after him in the first round who has signed to date. Every single one.


that's not even true.
Look at https://www.capfriendly.com/players/peyton-krebs

Drafted right after him.
Not only does he make less but his performance bonus is like 1/2 of his.
https://www.capfriendly.com/players/samuel-poulin
0 performance bonus

Simon Holmstrom
less pay and 0 performance bonus.

You don't even know what the hell you're talking about.
Apr 1 at 5:12
#13
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
that's not even true.
Look at https://www.capfriendly.com/players/peyton-krebs

Drafted right after him.
Not only does he make less but his performance bonus is like 1/2 of his.
https://www.capfriendly.com/players/samuel-poulin
0 performance bonus

Simon Holmstrom
less pay and 0 performance bonus.

You don't even know what the hell you're talking about.


The CapFriendly page for Peyton Krebs says that his total salary is $925,000 ($825,000 base salary plus the same $92,500 signing bonus as Newhook), whereas Newhook's base salary is $782,500 for a total compensation of $875,000. Krebs can earn performance bonuses totaling $412,500 according to CapFriendly, whereas Newhook could get $50,000. If I'm reading that information wrong, there's obviously something CapFriendly isn't telling us.

When you attempt to insult people with juvenile bs like "You don't even know what the hell you're talking about," and this is the third time you've attempted to insult me with those words, you really only insult yourself.
Apr 1 at 6:12
#14
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The CapFriendly page for Peyton Krebs says that his total salary is $925,000 ($825,000 base salary plus the same $92,500 signing bonus as Newhook), whereas Newhook's base salary is $782,500 for a total compensation of $875,000. Krebs can earn performance bonuses totaling $412,500 according to CapFriendly, whereas Newhook could get $50,000. If I'm reading that information wrong, there's obviously something CapFriendly isn't telling us.

When you attempt to insult people with juvenile bs like "You don't even know what the hell you're talking about," and this is the third time you've attempted to insult me with those words, you really only insult yourself.


his performance bonus is $850,000
It's almost double what Krebs is.
Be honest when looking at the numbers man. Don't act like you're blind.
Apr 1 at 6:15
#15
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
his performance bonus is $850,000
It's almost double what Krebs is.
Be honest when looking at the numbers man. Don't act like you're blind.


Wrong. Newhook's performance bonus for NEXT year is $850,000. For this year, it's $50,000.
Apr 1 at 6:17
#16
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Wrong. Newhook's performance bonus for NEXT year is $850,000. For this year, it's $50,000.


oh is he gonna hit his performance bonus not playing?

Not to mention you don't even look at ANY of the other forwards down the list. while making comments like

Quoting: OldNYIfan
And less than every single player drafted after him in the first round who has signed to date. Every single one.


Which is clearly not even close to true.

But here you are trying to argue it unwilling to admit you're just dead wrong.
His potential earnings are higher than everyone who is a forward below him. I didn't look at defensemen because that's not really a comparable.
But it's probably true on some of those too.
Apr 1 at 6:21
#17
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
oh is he gonna hit his performance bonus not playing?


Is Newhook's performance bonus this year $50,000 or $850,000? Until you develop some intellectual honesty and cop to that, nobody's interested in your opinions, erroneous or not.
Apr 1 at 6:23
#18
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Is Newhook's performance bonus this year $50,000 or $850,000? Until you develop some intellectual honesty and cop to that, nobody's interested in your opinions, erroneous or not.


you're going to lecture people about "Until you develop some intellectual honesty"

LOL

Tell me is the $0 performance bonus over the life of those contracts for the guys under him greater or less than the $850,000 per he can make per year the next two year?
Apr 1 at 6:30
#19
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
you're going to lecture people about "Until you develop some intellectual honesty"

LOL

Tell me is the $0 performance bonus over the life of those contracts for the guys under him greater or less than the $850,000 per he can make per year the next two year?


The pending question stands unanswered. It won't go away no matter how you try to change the subject, which is its own kind of intellectual dishonesty.
Apr 1 at 6:42
#20
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The pending question stands unanswered. It won't go away no matter how you try to change the subject, which is its own kind of intellectual dishonesty.


yes the pending answer is still unanswered.
e is the $0 performance bonus over the life of those contracts for the guys under him greater or less than the $850,000 per he can make per year the next two year?
your claim is they they paid him less than every player under him. That clearly isn't true over the life of that contract. And you are just a troll who can't admit it.
So let me know when you can admit you're wrong, again.
That his contract is actually better than the players below him and some above him. That he bet on himself and he can reap the rewards.
Apr 1 at 7:05
#21
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
yes the pending answer is still unanswered.
e is the $0 performance bonus over the life of those contracts for the guys under him greater or less than the $850,000 per he can make per year the next two year?
your claim is they they paid him less than every player under him. That clearly isn't true over the life of that contract. And you are just a troll who can't admit it.
So let me know when you can admit you're wrong, again.
That his contract is actually better than the players below him and some above him. That he bet on himself and he can reap the rewards.


The pending question, which I will restate since you are so eager to ignore it, was Did you or did you not say, in Comment #14 above, that Newhook's performance bonus in the first year of his contract is $850,000?
Apr 1 at 9:48
#22
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The pending question, which I will restate since you are so eager to ignore it, was Did you or did you not say, in Comment #14 above, that Newhook's performance bonus in the first year of his contract is $850,000?


I never said first year of anything.
I said his contract peformance is 850k. Which makes his contract worth more than every forward signed under him.
You act like how the money is broken up means ****.
You said they paid him less.
WRONG.
He got MORE than anyone under him, and a few guys above him.

Still having problems admitting your wrong.
Think you can just keep posting to deflect and avoid the truth?
Will you ever admit that he has a better contract?
Nah, you salty to do that.
Later loser.
Apr 1 at 10:03
#23
Club de Hockey 1909
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 664
Quoting: pharrow
I never said first year of anything.
I said his contract peformance is 850k. Which makes his contract worth more than every forward signed under him.
You act like how the money is broken up means ****.
You said they paid him less.
WRONG.
He got MORE than anyone under him, and a few guys above him.

Still having problems admitting your wrong.
Think you can just keep posting to deflect and avoid the truth?
Will you ever admit that he has a better contract?
Nah, you salty to do that.
Later loser.


Quoting: OldNYIfan
The pending question, which I will restate since you are so eager to ignore it, was Did you or did you not say, in Comment #14 above, that Newhook's performance bonus in the first year of his contract is $850,000?


I love arguments heated over performance bonuses
OldNYIfan and hwjw liked this.
Apr 2 at 3:11
#24
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 17,319
Likes: 8,570
Quoting: pharrow
Later loser.


To quote you:

“You don’t even know what the hell you’re talking about.”
“Don’t act like you’re blind.”
“You are just a troll who can’t admit it.”
“Later loser.”

I don’t know why you are so hateful and bitter, but name-calling is very revealing. Almost always, it establishes who is interested in using facts, and who can only resort to juvenile invective.

Whatever is wrong with you won’t be cured by trying to insult others.

If this is what you think will give you some sort of validation, I and 99% of the people reading this feel sorry for you.
Apr 2 at 7:20
#25
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 16,506
Likes: 4,150
Quoting: OldNYIfan
To quote you:

“You don’t even know what the hell you’re talking about.”
“Don’t act like you’re blind.”
“You are just a troll who can’t admit it.”
“Later loser.”

I don’t know why you are so hateful and bitter, but name-calling is very revealing. Almost always, it establishes who is interested in using facts, and who can only resort to juvenile invective.

Whatever is wrong with you won’t be cured by trying to insult others.

If this is what you think will give you some sort of validation, I and 99% of the people reading this feel sorry for you.


you over here trying to call people 'intellectually dishonest" and then cry when you get called a name back.
No surprise there. You can't admit you're wrong so why woud you be able to admit your own wrongs.
I have seen many people like you in life. It's always someone else's fault. Look in the mirror there.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Submit Poll Edit