SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Duchene

Created by: Texus
Team: 2016-17 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 5, 2017
Published: Jan. 5, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Duchene, Matt
  2. 2017 5th round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Plekanec, Tomas ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Sergachev, Mikhail
  3. 2017 2nd round pick (WSH)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
2018
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2019
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$69,992,017$0$470,000$3,007,983

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LW
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$839,166$839,166 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$912,500$912,500
C
UFA - 2
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 6
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 2
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$2,800,000$2,800,000
C
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,982,375$2,982,375
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 10
$6,500,000$6,500,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 2
$612,500$612,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 5, 2017 at 4:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
neato
Jan. 5, 2017 at 4:41 p.m.
#2
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 3,388
Not enough. Plekanec essentially carries negative value, since he's basically a waste of $6 million in cap space. Montreal will most likely have to send Plekanec, a first, Sergachey/Juulsen, and a decent young forward prospect
Jan. 5, 2017 at 5:07 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 136
Likes: 19
Quoting: krakowitz
Not enough. Plekanec essentially carries negative value, since he's basically a waste of $6 million in cap space. Montreal will most likely have to send Plekanec, a first, Sergachey/Juulsen, and a decent young forward prospect
Yeah Pleks is included because I think any deal would have to be more or less cap neutral, and he's the logical guy. The way I see it Col needs to look 2-3 years down the road anyways, so taking Plek short term is part of the price to pay to get a defenseman of Sergachev's calibre. I could see changing that second to a first, and maybe a B prospect forward but nothing more. I don't see too many other places that Colorado would be able to get an elite young defenseman with 1st pairing potential like Sergy, which is something they badly need. With this move their core 2-3 years from now is MacKinnon, Jost, Rantanen, Landeskog, Sergachev and Johnson. Either way though they need an elite defenseman to be part of it if they're gonna be any good.
Jan. 5, 2017 at 5:19 p.m.
#4
BorisBagel
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 554
Likes: 78
Habs won't be trading Sergachev, a future superstar

plus Gallchenyuk is better than Duchene and will remain Habs No. 1 C
Jan. 5, 2017 at 8:30 p.m.
#5
Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 384
Quoting: krakowitz
Not enough. Plekanec essentially carries negative value, since he's basically a waste of $6 million in cap space. Montreal will most likely have to send Plekanec, a first, Sergachey/Juulsen, and a decent young forward prospect
Disagree I think it's enough, in fact I'd be somewhat dissapointed if montreal made that trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll