What Should We Do?

Why would the Kings sign Ullmark when Petersen has shown he's ready to take over the starting role? He's top 10 in the league in SV% despite playing on a basement team.

Luff isn't coming back. He'll be traded or won't be qualified.

The Kings are averse to Russian players at this point. After Scherbak, Prokhorkin, and Kovalchuk all failed, the Kings are staying away from KHL expatriates. Gusev isn't coming to LA.

Seattle isn't taking Lemieux over Athanasiou, Andersson, or Grundstrom (if they go 4-4-1) or Clague (if they go 7-3-1).

Quick has negative value so Chicago isn't adding picks, so if you add a pick or prospect Chicago would accept

Ok, this is my first time doing this kind of stuff, it’s just mostly for fun

Quick and a 5?

probably a 3rd, St louis 2nd, or Samuel Fa gemo

I’ve actually seen people saying I’m overpaying, idk I’m torn rn so I won’t change it rn

Quick is not good and has negative value, it will cost LA to move his contract considering there is multiple years left still

The Kings aren't paying anyone to dump Quick. They're content to let him play out his contract as Petersen's backup. They don't need the cap space, and his actual cash salary is much less than his cap hit.

If they can get something of value in return for him, they might consider it. Otherwise he's not going anywhere.

I agree, my point is that Quick has negative value and If they were to trade him they would have to pay a team to take on his contact

As I said, some people, personally I don’t think it’s an overpay, both of your opinions are good valid opinions, I wanna make it interactive so, if you guys want, give me ideas.

What should I do? Give me ideas I’ll keep them in mind

Well like he said LA isn't in position to trade Quick but they do here's an idea
Quick (25% retention) & Fa gemo for 4th
Quick (50% retention) & 3rd for a 5th or 6th
Quick & LAK 2nd for 5th or 6th round pick