SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Then the Offseason

Created by: jfrojelin
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 13, 2021
Published: Apr. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$2,300,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,250,000
1$3,500,000
1$900,000
Trades
1.
SJS
ANA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan [Reserve List]
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (SJS)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
please take him. He's not all that bad Ron, please, for me
2.
SJS
  1. 2022 4th round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Gambrell, Dylan [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
We need a legit 3C, and I'd rather pay our 4C a little less than he may command. If he takes 900k then forget this trade exists
3.
SJS
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (EDM)
CGY
  1. Donato, Ryan [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Doug hinted that we may have 10 picks in this draft (irl we have 8). We just have so many wingers, and I think they've earned legit NHL shots. Also, saving any bits of money where we can is needed. 2022 offseason is huge
4.
SJS
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
  4. 2023 4th round pick (VAN)
VAN
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$68,488,696$0$857,500$13,011,304

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
$3,250,000$3,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:24 a.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Sorry Flames need picks for a possible rebuild/retool
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:27 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: Gmonwy
Sorry Flames need picks for a possible rebuild/retool


ok, probably another team then. I was looking for teams with multiple thirds
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:29 a.m.
#3
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: jfrojelin
ok, probably another team then. I was looking for teams with multiple thirds


I don't think they will but they need it. They are going to go nowhere with this team with Gaudreau and Monahan.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:34 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: Gmonwy
I don't think they will but they need it. They are going to go nowhere with this team with Gaudreau and Monahan.


Do you think they'd trade Gaudreu? at what price?
Apr. 13, 2021 at 11:35 a.m.
#5
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: jfrojelin
Do you think they'd trade Gaudreu? at what price?


No idea. I am biased as he is my favorite player. I can see them trading him to Philly because he grew up around there.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:08 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace
crankshaft liked this.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:14 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: papishark
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace


He certainly beats Granlund and will come cheaper.
papishark liked this.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:14 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: papishark
Why give away Donato? Hes on 40 point pace


Sasha, True, Gregor, and Blichfeld combined all cost less, so I want flexibility if I'm DW to acquire assets for cap dumps and have money for 2022 to keep our core. It could be Balcers as well. Even without him we aren't giving Cheko or Dahlen NHL shots which could be warranted next season.

I just think with out huge depth at wing we should use it to acquire a position of need like RD or C, or get futures.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:17 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: crankshaft
He certainly beats Granlund and will come cheaper.


Granlund warrants one year, so we get future flexibility. Also Granlund is a C, and trading Donato gets us another pick.

It's super little, but we need to maximize value
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:23 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Disagree with all the trades. Gambrell has earned a contract and his keep on the team. You only take on Eriksson in a full rebuild and we can't full rebuild with the NMC's and NTC's we have so that's moot. Donato is slightly better than Granlund, 4 years younger and cheaper.
papishark and FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:24 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: jfrojelin
Granlund warrants one year, so we get future flexibility. Also Granlund is a C, and trading Donato gets us another pick.

It's super little, but we need to maximize value


His profile says he's a C but he is mostly playing on the wing.
Apr. 13, 2021 at 12:34 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: crankshaft
Disagree with all the trades. Gambrell has earned a contract and his keep on the team. You only take on Eriksson in a full rebuild and we can't full rebuild with the NMC's and NTC's we have so that's moot. Donato is slightly better than Granlund, 4 years younger and cheaper.


My personal plan is to build for 2022-23. Sadly the offseason before it, we need to re-sign players. That's why I have so many low budget and 1 year deals, because of that.

Also I can totally take on Eriksson, it's one year that we can afford with 3mil to spare, and he's not even waived. Didn't even ask for a first. One year of paying a guy to not play does not indicate a rebuild. We're just gaining assets which we need.

Granlund has played more C than Donato. If you want a different player that's more of a true C I agree. Center depth is our largest need. If you're that set on Gambrell make him the 4C, I don't really care. He can still play PK and dzone starts that way. On the cuda, True is very entertaining and has worked well with pretty much any winger he's been given. Donato as a 3rd line winger would be eventually passed by Blichfeld Balcers Cheko etc. I just want to maximize value. Replacing Donato with slightly lesser versions of him, while paying less money and getting assets, is absolutely ideal. It's minor, but maximize value is what we need to do with tight cap, minimal assets, and an underaverage prospect pool
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll