SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Continuing to test this idea

Created by: Wqrrior
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 13, 2021
Published: Apr. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$908,333
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$6,500,000
3$7,250,000
1$874,125
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$875,000
2$2,275,000
1$1,350,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Graves, Ryan
Additional Details:
Expansion Relief (two likely exposed guys in return for one)
COL
  1. Virtanen, Jake
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
  3. 2021 5th round pick (CHI)
2.
VAN
    Seattle.
    Buyouts
    Recapture Fees
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the VAN
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2023
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$78,399,784$648,780$200,000$3,100,216
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $7,250,000$7,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,875,000$5,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $908,333$908,333
    RW, LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $725,000$725,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,225,000$1,225,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $875,000$875,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,275,000$2,275,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,166,667$3,166,667
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,950,000$5,950,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $874,125$874,125
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $725,000$725,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
    G
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 7:47 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 4,172
    Likes: 1,646
    Really dont see colorado giving up 3 players for a 2nd rd pick in a weak draft with limited scouting
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 7:50 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 10,250
    Likes: 3,963
    Quoting: JeffW
    Really dont see colorado giving up 3 players for a 2nd rd pick in a weak draft with limited scouting


    i'd be willing to part with the 2022 2nd if that changes it. Mentality was that it is more likely that the 2021 2nd is higher positionally.
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 8:13 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    I would rather just lose graves for free to Seattle then trade him and compher while taking on virtanen

    That’s a step back on the avs roster, virtanen is not a fit
    HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 8:31 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 10,250
    Likes: 3,963
    Quoting: coga16
    I would rather just lose graves for free to Seattle then trade him and compher while taking on virtanen

    That’s a step back on the avs roster, virtanen is not a fit


    Let's assume the expansion draft doesn't exist,

    you are Sakic and you want to swap each of these players purely for picks. What is your ask on each of the above players, gaging only by picks, hypothetically?
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 8:34 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    Let's assume the expansion draft doesn't exist,

    you are Sakic and you want to swap each of these players purely for picks. What is your ask on each of the above players, gaging only by picks, hypothetically?


    At a minimum You’re trying to get 2nd round picks as the value for each of these players. Anything less you keep the players bc you can’t replace with a bunch of mid round picks

    But Sakic isn’t in the market of selling off players who help their depth in competiting for cup for draft picks nor are at the cap dumps they want to get rid of
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 9:58 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 4,172
    Likes: 1,646
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    i'd be willing to part with the 2022 2nd if that changes it. Mentality was that it is more likely that the 2021 2nd is higher positionally.


    What team would trade 3 active roster players for a 2nd round pick
    Apr. 13, 2021 at 10:41 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 10,250
    Likes: 3,963
    Quoting: JeffW
    What team would trade 3 active roster players for a 2nd round pick


    three?

    I try not to be optimistic about Jakes value, but Bennet's deal this TDL kinda changed that. I don't expect him to be quite as valuable, but the same reasons for value exist. Colorado might not be a fit, but the target of the value is more pertaining to the expansion draft.

    If these two are going to be exposed likely anyways, then I made the assumption that its better to sell them off for assets rather than outright losing them or paying to keep them. Compher makes more money than he is worth (I struggle to believe that he would pull a 2nd -- he had a rough start, though I have seen he has started to turn it around a bit), and Graves isn't quite what he was last year.

    That's not to say they are valueless or I wouldn't propose this in the first place. Idea is simply to give value towards what is likely lost anyways. If there's no value, then I learn from it and walk away. Whole purpose of this website is to throw something out there and see if it will stick. I don't think anything ever really sticks, but at least there's the ability to bring it as close as reasonably viable. No fit, no problem.
    Apr. 14, 2021 at 6:39 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 4,172
    Likes: 1,646
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    three?

    I try not to be optimistic about Jakes value, but Bennet's deal this TDL kinda changed that. I don't expect him to be quite as valuable, but the same reasons for value exist. Colorado might not be a fit, but the target of the value is more pertaining to the expansion draft.

    If these two are going to be exposed likely anyways, then I made the assumption that its better to sell them off for assets rather than outright losing them or paying to keep them. Compher makes more money than he is worth (I struggle to believe that he would pull a 2nd -- he had a rough start, though I have seen he has started to turn it around a bit), and Graves isn't quite what he was last year.

    That's not to say they are valueless or I wouldn't propose this in the first place. Idea is simply to give value towards what is likely lost anyways. If there's no value, then I learn from it and walk away. Whole purpose of this website is to throw something out there and see if it will stick. I don't think anything ever really sticks, but at least there's the ability to bring it as close as reasonably viable. No fit, no problem.


    Yes 3, because after this trade is done seattle still gets to take a guy for free..

    Btw two established NHL players for a 2nd and a project makes no sense to a contender.

    If seattle picks graves then that's okay you can replace him within the system.. they pick compher or donskoi then again you replace him within the system.. you lose all 3 it's a major setback
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll