SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft Thots

Created by: JumboFett
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2021
Published: Apr. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Let's say SJ wins 2OA, but wants to increase their chances of draft success, so they trade down. NJD is holding the 6OA... let the improv begin.

I think we pick Brandt Clarke 6OA, then Sebastian Cossa and Ayrton Martino with the two 2nds.

SJ fans, lemme know who you like.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
3$1,500,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2021 1st round pick (NYI)
  2. 2021 1st round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
6OA, 26OA
NJD
  1. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
2OA
2.
SJS
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (OTT)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (SJS)
OTT
  1. 2021 1st round pick (NYI)
3.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$64,635,363$0$425,000$16,864,637
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 16, 2021 at 5:47 p.m.
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 5,799
See’s “Draft Thots”

Its a bold strategy, let's see if it pays off for them.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 5:53 p.m.
#2
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 6:14 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,972
Likes: 11,970
Assuming the standings stay roughly the same, I don't think it would make much sense for Ottawa to do that. The difference between a late 1st (26th in this case), and Ottawa's own 2nd (33rd) is pretty negligible. Definitely not worth an additional 2nd, and probably not really worth moving up at all.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 6:25 p.m.
#4
MartysBetter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 785
Likes: 181
I don't think the value is super unfair but doubtful NJ is interested. From what GM Tom Fitzgerald has hinted at the Islanders pick might be used as a trade piece for a ready now player since the team wants to compete next year. Only way I'd do the trade is if VAN picks above NJ and below SJS. I want Luke Hughes and I really don't want him in VAN.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 6:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 372
Likes: 168
Quoting: MartysBetter29
I don't think the value is super unfair but doubtful NJ is interested. From what GM Tom Fitzgerald has hinted at the Islanders pick might be used as a trade piece for a ready now player since the team wants to compete next year. Only way I'd do the trade is if VAN picks above NJ and below SJS. I want Luke Hughes and I really don't want him in VAN.


Given we've won 2 in our last 10, we won't be picking at 6OA. Odds look like we'll end up at 1-3OA so you'll have a crack at Power or Hughes.
MartysBetter29 liked this.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 7:32 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 313
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.


Sure, no problem.

Also, thanks for that pick value insight.
BeterChiarelli liked this.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 7:45 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,967
Likes: 18,303
I don't think there is a huge difference between #2 and #6...at least not big enough to lose that second 1st pick.

Just going by consensus rankings, I think I'd rather have 6/26 over 2.

Consensus Rankings
1. Matty Beniers
2. Owen Power
3. Luke Hughes
4. William Eklund
5. Dylan Guenther
6. Brandt Clarke
7. Kent Johnson
8. Jesper Wallstedt
9. Simon Edvinssson
10. Fabian Lysell
11. Aatu Raty
12. Chaz Lucius
13. Cole Sillinger
14. Oskar Olausson
15. Simon Robertsson
16. Carson Lambos
17. Xavier Bourgault
18. Nikita Chibrikov
19. Mason MacTavish
20. Zachary L'Heureux
21. Stanislav Svozil
22. Francesco Pinelli
23. Matt Coronato
24. Logan Stankoven
25. Zachary Bolduc
26. Isak Rosen
27. Zach Dean
28. Sebastian Cossa
29. Daniil Chayka
30. Corson Ceulemans
31. Sam Tuomaala
32. Fyodor Svechkov
Apr. 16, 2021 at 7:48 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,967
Likes: 18,303
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Wanna finish filling out your roster so I don't need to move this to the SJS subforum? I don't want to immediately dust this because you have some trades here for a hypothetical scenario but neither the discussion or title are wholly relevant to the rest of the AGM. Just something we've been asked to keep an eye on.

In terms of actual discussion, I'll refer to this source: https://bluebulletreport.com/2020/10/05/2020-nhl-draft-rankings/

The #2 pick has a value of 87.31. The combination of picks #6 and #26 (based on where NYI is in the standings by points percentage today) has a value of 59.93. The Sharks are being cheated of value equivalent to the #10 pick here. I'm not particularly sure how New Jersey bridges that gap without Ty Smith or Holtz.

Secondly, the Sharks - should they have pick #2 - only stand to benefit with the quality of prospect available to them. Any of Beniers, Clarke, Eklund, Guenther, Hughes, Power, or Wallstedt would be phenomenal picks for this organization. I don't think San Jose stands to gain much by trading back here. Just take whomever management deems is the BPA and start accumulating pieces for a long rebuild. If anything, a defender taken this year should have more than enough time to over-ripen and be NHL ready by the time the Sharks are done accumulating top picks.


The draft pick value charts don't really work for NHL trades at this point in draft since there are so few picks traded in top-10.
There are too few comps - and drafts vary year to year at top of the list.
They hold weight when you get to later rounds.
But picks in top half of 1st round are rarely moved.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 8:10 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 313
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I don't think there is a huge difference between #2 and #6...at least not big enough to lose that second 1st pick.

Just going by consensus rankings, I think I'd rather have 6/26 over 2.

Consensus Rankings
1. Matty Beniers
2. Owen Power
3. Luke Hughes
4. William Eklund
5. Dylan Guenther
6. Brandt Clarke
7. Kent Johnson
8. Jesper Wallstedt
9. Simon Edvinssson
10. Fabian Lysell
11. Aatu Raty
12. Chaz Lucius
13. Cole Sillinger
14. Oskar Olausson
15. Simon Robertsson
16. Carson Lambos
17. Xavier Bourgault
18. Nikita Chibrikov
19. Mason MacTavish
20. Zachary L'Heureux
21. Stanislav Svozil
22. Francesco Pinelli
23. Matt Coronato
24. Logan Stankoven
25. Zachary Bolduc
26. Isak Rosen
27. Zach Dean
28. Sebastian Cossa
29. Daniil Chayka
30. Corson Ceulemans
31. Sam Tuomaala
32. Fyodor Svechkov


TBH, if SJ does win 2OA, and Beniers isn't taken 1OA, I'd definitely keep the pick and take him. Matty Beniers has a style that looks like a combo of Patty Marleau and Logan Couture.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 8:17 p.m.
#10
MartysBetter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 785
Likes: 181
Quoting: DevilsFanInTX
Given we've won 2 in our last 10, we won't be picking at 6OA. Odds look like we'll end up at 1-3OA so you'll have a crack at Power or Hughes.


Yes pls. I'd be thrilled with either of those players.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 8:18 p.m.
#11
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The draft pick value charts don't really work for NHL trades at this point in draft since there are so few picks traded in top-10.
There are too few comps - and drafts vary year to year at top of the list.
They hold weight when you get to later rounds.
But picks in top half of 1st round are rarely moved.


Those pick values take data from every draft since the league expanded to 30 teams iirc so like they are considering historical data to an extent.

I think the last point you made is key here: the last top-10 pick I remember being moved was the pick used to select Lias Anderson.
Apr. 16, 2021 at 8:37 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,967
Likes: 18,303
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Those pick values take data from every draft since the league expanded to 30 teams iirc so like they are considering historical data to an extent.

I think the last point you made is key here: the last top-10 pick I remember being moved was the pick used to select Lias Anderson.


Yes, I was talking really about pick(s)-for-pick(s) swaps.
Other leagues see plenty of them, and NHL sees a lot in later rounds, but few in top-10
Over recent drafts here is the highest pick exchanged in pick-for-pick scenario....
(last top-10 was in 2008 when Isles dropped back twice)

2020: 19
2019: 11
2018: 22
2017: 26
2016: 11
2015: 24
2014: 20
2013: 18
2012: 14
2011: 22
2010: 15
2009: 12
2008: 5
Apr. 17, 2021 at 2:45 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 319
Leafs decline. They like Kerfoot.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll