SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I love MO but

Created by: Jameshgfgn
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 29, 2021
Published: Apr. 29, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,100,000
6$4,150,000
1$750,000
1$1,000,000
3$1,150,000
3$3,000,000
4$4,300,000
Trades
1.
TOR
SEA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
2.
TOR
  1. Domi, Max ($2,515,000 retained)
CBJ
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Denisenko, Grigori
  2. 2022 4th round pick (FLA)
  3. 2022 7th round pick (FLA)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Kivihalme, Teemu
  2. Rielly, Morgan ($2,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the FLA
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$77,518,116$0$400,000$3,981,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
Domi, Max
-$1,190,000-$1,190,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Matthews, Auston
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Marner, Mitchell
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Galchenyuk, Alex
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Tavares, John
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Nylander, William
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Mikheyev, Ilya
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Johansson, Marcus
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Hyman, Zach
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Simmonds, Wayne
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Brooks, Adam
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Spezza, Jason
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Muzzin, Jake
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Holl, Justin
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Ullmark, Linus
$4,300,000$4,300,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Sandin, Rasmus
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Brodie, TJ
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Campbell, Jack
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Liljegren, Timothy
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Dermott, Travis
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
Bogosian, Zach
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 29, 2021 at 4:52 p.m.
#1
ZachHymanForTheHart
Trad Breliving
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 1,989
Doesn’t Pittsburgh already have an overload on the left side?
Leafsfan416 liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 4:57 p.m.
#2
Jameshgfgn
Thread Starter
The commissioner
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 945
Likes: 105
Quoting: ZachHymanForTheHart
Doesn’t Pittsburgh already have an overload on the left side?


Mike Matheson is their second pair LD with Cody ceci on the RD
A top pair of Reilly and Latang would be great
Apr. 29, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
#3
Leafsfan416
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Mike Matheson is their second pair LD with Cody ceci on the RD
A top pair of Reilly and Latang would be great


Pittsburgh has on LD:
Dumoulin is on the top pair and very underrated.
Matheson
Petterson
Joesph
Riikola

Where does Rielly exactly fit in there?
Apr. 29, 2021 at 5:18 p.m.
#4
Barilko14
In Pridham we trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1,969
I'm pretty certain Leafs could move Rielly somewhere without having to retain.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 5:45 p.m.
#5
Jameshgfgn
Thread Starter
The commissioner
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 945
Likes: 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Pittsburgh has on LD:
Dumoulin is on the top pair and very underrated.
Matheson
Petterson
Joesph
Riikola

Where does Rielly exactly fit in there?

Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote
Apr. 29, 2021 at 5:59 p.m.
#6
VijayPatel11
In Zito We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1,596
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote


the point is that they already have 5 NHL ready LDs so they don't need Rielly
Leafsfan416 liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 5:59 p.m.
#7
Leafsfan416
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Are you really trying to say rn that MO is not an upgrade on 99% of the guys you just wrote


Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂
Faulk_my_Dzingel liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:04 p.m.
#8
Faulk_my_Dzingel
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 2,350
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂


He might be. But JR would send another 1st and Dumoulin back.
Leafsfan416 liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:06 p.m.
#9
Jameshgfgn
Thread Starter
The commissioner
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 945
Likes: 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Um, can you read? I said where does Rielly fit in with Pittsburgh’s over crowed LD
Matheson has another 5 years
Petterson has another 4 years
Dumoulin has another 2 years

Why are you picking a team to trade Rielly to that has no need for him. Jim Rutherford is gone you are aware 😂


Quoting: VijayPatel11
the point is that they already have 5 NHL ready LDs so they don't need Rielly

That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:19 p.m.
#10
Leafsfan416
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


I don’t even know why you are fighting this, it’s just a bad trade. They already went out and traded Hornqvist for Matheson, an offensive Dman. And now you think they should part with a former 1st rounder, a 1st round pick for Rielly who they will have to try and resign. 😂
Icehockey18121124 liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:22 p.m.
#11
Icehockey18121124
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 124
Likes: 66
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.
Leafsfan416 and Pensfan89 liked this.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:24 p.m.
#12
Leafsfan416
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Icehockey18121124
I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.


This
Apr. 29, 2021 at 6:27 p.m.
#13
Pensfan89
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
That is a stupid mind set to have if you can improve a position you do it. Trade one of them don’t just be like well we could upgrade but because we have guys under contract we won’t


The trade doesn’t work because you are taking a guy on a ELC that’s likely going to be our 2nd or 3rd pair LD next year. Now we take Reilly on and have to trade one of Pettersson or Matheson just to take on 1 year of Reilly who the pens still wouldn’t be able to afford to re-sign. So it just doesn’t work. If you want to swap POJ with Matheson or even MP, then that’s a lot closer for Pittsburgh, but I doubt Toronto would want that Matheson contract.
Apr. 29, 2021 at 7:18 p.m.
#14
Jameshgfgn
Thread Starter
The commissioner
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 945
Likes: 105
Quoting: Leafsfan416
This


Quoting: Icehockey18121124
I think what is trying to be said is that Pit is not the team to move him to. Burke and Hextall have already said they will be saving future assets to build for the future. Giving up a 1st, the best D prospect and more for one year of a guy who would not be on the top PP or the top pairing as they will keep Dumo with Letang as they compliment each other very well is not a good move for the future.

Tor can find someone to trade with without out the retention which would be a big difference for Tor.


Quoting: Pensfan89
The trade doesn’t work because you are taking a guy on a ELC that’s likely going to be our 2nd or 3rd pair LD next year. Now we take Reilly on and have to trade one of Pettersson or Matheson just to take on 1 year of Reilly who the pens still wouldn’t be able to afford to re-sign. So it just doesn’t work. If you want to swap POJ with Matheson or even MP, then that’s a lot closer for Pittsburgh, but I doubt Toronto would want that Matheson contract.


Here changed it
Apr. 29, 2021 at 7:40 p.m.
#15
Leafsfan416
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Jameshgfgn
Here changed it


Constructed criticism, pick again.
Weegar Ekblad
Yandle Gudas
Kiersted Nutivaara
Gildon Stralman
Apr. 29, 2021 at 10:32 p.m.
#16
Viqsi
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 3,090
Immediate no from the Jackets. Downgrading at C is not worth a 2nd.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll