SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

new season

Created by: DirtyDangle
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 30, 2021
Published: Apr. 30, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
8$8,500,000
1$2,400,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$8,500,000
5$5,500,000
1$950,000
2$1,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
COL
  1. van Riemsdyk, James ($1,000,000 retained)
PHI
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. Timmins, Conor [RFA Rights]
  3. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
3.
COL
  1. Lehkonen, Artturi [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 4th round pick (MTL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,973,963$1,741,463$3,775,000-$473,963
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 2
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$8,500,000$8,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,500,000$5,500,000
G
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,166,667$3,166,667
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$950,000$950,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 30, 2021 at 2:53 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
MTL would rather have Lehkonen at 2.4M than Compher at 3.5M + we need Left Wingers not Right wingers
Apr. 30, 2021 at 3:25 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
JVR trade is bad real bad. One it’s an over pay. Two he is such a bad fit stylistically that he might literally be an anchor on any line he plays. And two years to Glendening who literally is straight awful?
Apr. 30, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 306
Likes: 103
Quoting: Xqb15a
JVR trade is bad real bad. One it’s an over pay. Two he is such a bad fit stylistically that he might literally be an anchor on any line he plays. And two years to Glendening who literally is straight awful?


TBH, Philly turns that trade down too. JVR is the highest scorer on the team and has played a better all-around game than has been expected since he re-signed in Philly. I don't expect him to be dealt, and his contract is part of the reason; he shouldn't fetch enough value for what he's worth staying on the team. It's one of those situations where it is just better to keep the player as a good fit right where he is.
Xqb15a liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 3:49 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: GMs
MTL would rather have Lehkonen at 2.4M than Compher at 3.5M + we need Left Wingers not Right wingers


fair enough but compher can play center and habs will need a center after danault walks.
GMs liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 3:50 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
JVR trade is bad real bad. One it’s an over pay. Two he is such a bad fit stylistically that he might literally be an anchor on any line he plays. And two years to Glendening who literally is straight awful?


he can keep up. he also gets to the net which the avs desperately need, especially on that 2nd line and pp.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 4:13 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: DirtyDangle
fair enough but compher can play center and habs will need a center after danault walks.


That is true, but I think via UFA are trading for a 3C like Kerfoot Compher etc without giving up a player (Lehky) would be better. They have a lot of draft picks
Apr. 30, 2021 at 4:17 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: GMs
That is true, but I think via UFA are trading for a 3C like Kerfoot Compher etc without giving up a player (Lehky) would be better. They have a lot of draft picks


no worries. i assumed habs would just want an elc to talk his spot so it's more money out. a draft pick would work better for the avs.
GMs liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 6:28 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: DirtyDangle
he can keep up. he also gets to the net which the avs desperately need, especially on that 2nd line and pp.


He is not a good transition player and that’s what the Avs are. Who on the top 6 outside of Burakovsky won’t go to the net? Hell I’d rather buyout Compher to bring back Saad then pay that and have to watch JVR try and keep up.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 7:04 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
He is not a good transition player and that’s what the Avs are. Who on the top 6 outside of Burakovsky won’t go to the net? Hell I’d rather buyout Compher to bring back Saad then pay that and have to watch JVR try and keep up.


everyone but landeskog. they all perfer the rush or cycle along the board. avs could use a big net front presence.

buying out compher is just dead cap space.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 7:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: DirtyDangle
everyone but landeskog. they all perfer the rush or cycle along the board. avs could use a big net front presence.

buying out compher is just dead cap space.


That’s ridiculous go look at their heat maps for shots and goals they all go to the net.

I said buyout Compher because I’m one of the Avs fans on her that doesn’t think he is a waste to emphasize my point.

And Newhook on the 4th line is a waste of talent.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 7:43 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
That’s ridiculous go look at their heat maps for shots and goals they all go to the net.

I said buyout Compher because I’m one of the Avs fans on her that doesn’t think he is a waste to emphasize my point.

And Newhook on the 4th line is a waste of talent.


jvr's is better than everyone except landeskog. although kardi's was higher than i thought.

compher can turn it around but he isn't worth what he's getting paid right now.

newhook can move up with good play or injuries. i see no reason to pencil him in any higher in the lineup until he earns it. depth is a good thing.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 7:59 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: DirtyDangle
jvr's is better than everyone except landeskog. although kardi's was higher than i thought.

compher can turn it around but he isn't worth what he's getting paid right now.

newhook can move up with good play or injuries. i see no reason to pencil him in any higher in the lineup until he earns it. depth is a good thing.


JVR we will agree to disagree.

Compher agree.

Newhook is a top 6 guy, playing him on an energy/checking line is waste of talent. He was rated as the 9th best prospect in the league for a reason and is averaging over a ppg with the Eagles. You want him to continue that offense and grow defensively so you play him with high skilled guys, not wasting time forechecking with guys like LOC (no knock on him). You don’t have a Ferrari and use it as a pick up truck because you want to drive it. Let him do what he does best, score, and figure out the rest as his goes not go do something else then hope later after he figures out the defense to play offense.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 8:21 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
JVR we will agree to disagree.

Compher agree.

Newhook is a top 6 guy, playing him on an energy/checking line is waste of talent. He was rated as the 9th best prospect in the league for a reason and is averaging over a ppg with the Eagles. You want him to continue that offense and grow defensively so you play him with high skilled guys, not wasting time forechecking with guys like LOC (no knock on him). You don’t have a Ferrari and use it as a pick up truck because you want to drive it. Let him do what he does best, score, and figure out the rest as his goes not go do something else then hope later after he figures out the defense to play offense.


ahl isn't what it normal is. watered down this year. i just don't see the need to pencil him in any higher. if he doesn't deliver than you have a hole to fill midseason. the avs are contenders. i'd rather him work is way up the lineup.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 8:46 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: DirtyDangle
ahl isn't what it normal is. watered down this year. i just don't see the need to pencil him in any higher. if he doesn't deliver than you have a hole to fill midseason. the avs are contenders. i'd rather him work is way up the lineup.


That’s called poor asset management. The kid has elite offensive skills. What’s the most valuable thing in hockey? The ability to score? Dropping him into the 4th line to do things you aren’t going to ask him to do in his career is foolish. I’d rather him be in the AHL them playing on the 4th line playing against the type of player he is. You didn’t draft him in the 1st round to be a grinder you drafted him to score, play him and develop him as such.
TJTwolf liked this.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 9:02 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
That’s called poor asset management. The kid has elite offensive skills. What’s the most valuable thing in hockey? The ability to score? Dropping him into the 4th line to do things you aren’t going to ask him to do in his career is foolish. I’d rather him be in the AHL them playing on the 4th line playing against the type of player he is. You didn’t draft him in the 1st round to be a grinder you drafted him to score, play him and develop him as such.


yea that's an option too. hold off until next season. but i like the idea of him getting some nhl experience next season.

poor asset management is assuming you have that you don't. like assuming a prospect is a sure thing and guaranteeing them a spot and a role.
Apr. 30, 2021 at 10:30 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: DirtyDangle
yea that's an option too. hold off until next season. but i like the idea of him getting some nhl experience next season.

poor asset management is assuming you have that you don't. like assuming a prospect is a sure thing and guaranteeing them a spot and a role.


True but also poor asset management is putting them in a position to not succeed. It like in baseball if you have a power pitcher that throws 95+ you don’t make him start throwing a knuckle ball or play 1st. Newhook should at worst play on the 3rd line next year.
May 1, 2021 at 2:25 a.m.
#17
Hockeynerd Oiler Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 89
Likes: 13
No taxi squads next year. Unless the Avs are going to carry less than the standard 23 players you're going to have to find a couple million somewhere for 3 more players. Gonna be tight. Grubauer might take 5.5 to stay with a cup contender, but he'll get offers from other teams for more. Landeskog might stay for 7.5 which would save you a mil, and maybe they get Makar for a hair over 8?? Just to beat what Chabot got in Ottawa. Still tough to fit.

But if they win the cup this year, they'll lose one of those guys... likely Grubauer.
May 1, 2021 at 5:30 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Krahntinuum
No taxi squads next year. Unless the Avs are going to carry less than the standard 23 players you're going to have to find a couple million somewhere for 3 more players. Gonna be tight. Grubauer might take 5.5 to stay with a cup contender, but he'll get offers from other teams for more. Landeskog might stay for 7.5 which would save you a mil, and maybe they get Makar for a hair over 8?? Just to beat what Chabot got in Ottawa. Still tough to fit.

But if they win the cup this year, they'll lose one of those guys... likely Grubauer.


5.5m is market for gru. should be enough. also enough money for a 22 man roster which should be enough.
May 1, 2021 at 2:25 p.m.
#19
Hockeynerd Oiler Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 89
Likes: 13
Quoting: DirtyDangle
5.5m is market for gru. should be enough. also enough money for a 22 man roster which should be enough.


I agree, but there are other teams that will offer more. Guarantee the Oilers would offer 6M/4yrs. I suspect Grubauer will be willing to take a slight haircut to stay in Colorado... unless they win the cup.
May 1, 2021 at 2:52 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: Krahntinuum
I agree, but there are other teams that will offer more. Guarantee the Oilers would offer 6M/4yrs. I suspect Grubauer will be willing to take a slight haircut to stay in Colorado... unless they win the cup.


cup or no cup I think $5.5m gets it done. i dont he makes it to market
Krahntinuum and TJTwolf liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll