SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing the Defence

Created by: arafay
Team: 2021-22 Winnipeg Jets
Initial Creation Date: May 1, 2021
Published: May 1, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,000,000
8$6,000,000
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$4,000,000
1$4,000,000
Trades
1.
WPG
SEA
  1. DeMelo, Dylan
  2. Niku, Sami
Additional Details:
Niku to ensure they take demelo
2.
COL
  1. 2023 4th round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Waives NMC to allow colorado to protect their guys. Approves trade to Winnipeg instead of going to Seattle.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2022
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2023
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$81,048,813$145,122$1,407,500$451,187
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$7,142,857$7,142,857
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$817,500$817,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,166,667$6,166,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$863,333$863,333
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,291,667$5,291,667
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 1, 2021 at 5:22 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: arafay
We need size, dumba isn’t what we need. He would help with the puckmoving, but the issue with the jets d is mainly size, heinola and Stanley will help the issues with puckmoving


Due respect, but this is how you end up with guys like Ziatsev and Gudbrannson. Obviously size is nice but it’s overvalued.
Windjammer, bunzy1034 and arafay liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 5:24 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Do a deal with the Rangers, they have plenty of D depth and could use Adam Lowry. Both teams could benefit.
May 1, 2021 at 5:30 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
Who else would they protect? The keep the 3 top 4 guys (Morrissey, Pionk, Dumba) and let Seattle pick from the guys who are borderline top 4 at best. It’s not a big loss, especially since Heinola will jump in next season.


Stanley has looked good, I would consider him
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 5:36 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Stanley has looked good, I would consider him


Fair. I’d then ask if there is a forward that is in the same value realm that might be taken instead? Unless Seattle has hawk eyes for one guy, it usually comes down to how much better or worse those players are. Of their pretty equal, the cost of “expansion considerations” goes down.

I just don’t know why it’s important to protect fringe guys when you have the opportunity to improve the team.
May 1, 2021 at 5:39 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
Fair. I’d then ask if there is a forward that is in the same value realm that might be taken instead? Unless Seattle has hawk eyes for one guy, it usually comes down to how much better or worse those players are. Of their pretty equal, the cost of “expansion considerations” goes down.

I just don’t know why it’s important to protect fringe guys when you have the opportunity to improve the team.


TBH if I'm Seattle and DeMelo is exposed I'm still ranking him at the top. He's had a rough year in Winnipeg but is still solid defensively and I expect the team they build to be very defense oriented
jnowariak and arafay liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 5:41 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
TBH if I'm Seattle and DeMelo is exposed I'm still ranking him at the top. He's had a rough year in Winnipeg but is still solid defensively and I expect the team they build to be very defense oriented


I agree. Lots of good defenders and young promising goalies are going to be available.
May 1, 2021 at 5:46 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
I agree. Lots of good defenders and young promising goalies are going to be available.


genuinely curious on this, what do you think the odds are that EK65 waives to go to Seattle since he has spoken out about not wanting to rebuild? I think its possible but Sharks will probably have to pay up and/or take on a short term contract from them (that they pick up from another team dumping cap)
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 5:51 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
genuinely curious on this, what do you think the odds are that EK65 waives to go to Seattle since he has spoken out about not wanting to rebuild? I think its possible but Sharks will probably have to pay up and/or take on a short term contract from them (that they pick up from another team dumping cap)


I don’t hate the move from Seattle’s perspective cause he could be their Fleury. But 11.5 for 5 more years is a contract. Maybe SJS offers to eat 3 mil a year? That could make it doable and SJS gets a boatload of cap space.
May 1, 2021 at 6:04 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
I don’t hate the move from Seattle’s perspective cause he could be their Fleury. But 11.5 for 5 more years is a contract. Maybe SJS offers to eat 3 mil a year? That could make it doable and SJS gets a boatload of cap space.


Don't think any team has ever ate that much retention for that long. I think if another team like Vancouver pays them to take on Lou or something they work a deal to send that anchor to SJS
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 6:08 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Don't think any team has ever ate that much retention for that long. I think if another team like Vancouver pays them to take on Lou or something they work a deal to send that anchor to SJS


If I’m Seattle, I would never eat that whole deal. SJS looks to be embracing the rebuild and that 8 mil could be repurposed more effectively. But I see your point.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 6:14 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,336
Likes: 8,989
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t touch him if I’m Winnipeg. I’d go after Dumba tho, that would be a positive add


I 100% get this because of his inability to stay healthy, but if (when) he waives for the XD that will be it. COL can still use him when he is healthy and there cap situation isn’t so tight they would look to move on from a guy that besides being able to play (when healthy) has been super valuable in the locker room. But yeah that whole when healthy thing seems to be getting less and less frequent.
May 1, 2021 at 6:34 p.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
If I’m Seattle, I would never eat that whole deal. SJS looks to be embracing the rebuild and that 8 mil could be repurposed more effectively. But I see your point.


I feel like a top 4 of this is too appealing for Seattle:
Skjei/McDonagh - EK65
Graves - DeMelo
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 6:45 p.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I feel like a top 4 of this is too appealing for Seattle:
Skjei/McDonagh - EK65
Graves - DeMelo


I wonder if COL protects Burakovsky. If they don’t he’s a no brainer. But their back end will be overpaid, but it will be good.
May 1, 2021 at 7:12 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
I wonder if COL protects Burakovsky. If they don’t he’s a no brainer. But their back end will be overpaid, but it will be good.


Graves is way too sturdy of a top 4 dman to ignore in expansion
May 1, 2021 at 7:14 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Graves is way too sturdy of a top 4 dman to ignore in expansion


Definitely. But I look at the available defenseman and forwards and Burakovsky would be one of the few top 6 guys available. I also think there will be other top 4 defense available. In no way was I selling Graves short, expansion is a strategic decision for all involved.
May 1, 2021 at 7:22 p.m.
#41
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,231
Likes: 19,503
Quoting: jnowariak
Definitely. But I look at the available defenseman and forwards and Burakovsky would be one of the few top 6 guys available. I also think there will be other top 4 defense available. In no way was I selling Graves short, expansion is a strategic decision for all involved.


Personally I think Bura is protected, for top 6 wingers they should get at least 1 from Tampa, may get Dadonov from Ottawa, maybe Zucker from Pittsburg
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 9:31 p.m.
#42
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,624
Likes: 12,352
Quoting: jnowariak
Due respect, but this is how you end up with guys like Ziatsev and Gudbrannson. Obviously size is nice but it’s overvalued.


Watch the Jets runty dmen get knocked around and unable to break up a cycle or win a puck battle and you'll see why size is still necessary on the backend, not every dman needs to be big but some size is still needed, the Avs really missed Johnson in the playoffs last year.
jnowariak and arafay liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 10:38 p.m.
#43
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,934
Likes: 26,435
Quoting: arafay
Hamilton realistically won’t come to Winnipeg. This is much more realistic. Also, Hamilton is good at moving the puck but he isn’t very physical, especially at his size. We also have heinola as the long term powerplay qb, Hamilton would only block him. I’m not that much of a fan of Hamilton’s on ice results tbh. Yes he drives play and helps the jets, but he won’t be worth that contract for long and the jets’ window is going to be open for a while.


Good point. Maybe wait until 2022 FA to get a dman. Just don't trade for EJ
Windjammer liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 10:42 p.m.
#44
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2,384
Quoting: jnowariak
Due respect, but this is how you end up with guys like Ziatsev and Gudbrannson. Obviously size is nice but it’s overvalued.


I agree, but Erik Johnson is a proven commodity, no sugar coating or small sample size like the case was for those guys.
jnowariak liked this.
May 1, 2021 at 10:43 p.m.
#45
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2,384
Quoting: delneggs
Do a deal with the Rangers, they have plenty of D depth and could use Adam Lowry. Both teams could benefit.


The jets need Lowry, what do the rangers have to give back that would make it worthwhile for them? I can’t think of anything
May 1, 2021 at 10:46 p.m.
#46
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2,384
Quoting: Devil1122
Good point. Maybe wait until 2022 FA to get a dman. Just don't trade for EJ


EJ is a temporary fix until then. I’m going after pulock or severson as the jets. Hometowns bear here (essentially hometown team), might want to be closer to home. Could be fits.
May 1, 2021 at 11:12 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: arafay
I agree, but Erik Johnson is a proven commodity, no sugar coating or small sample size like the case was for those guys.


Agreed. The point I was trying to make was about the fact that big d men tend to be relatively bad. Johnson is not that, the biggest knock against him is that he’s aging.
May 1, 2021 at 11:14 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: arafay
The jets need Lowry, what do the rangers have to give back that would make it worthwhile for them? I can’t think of anything


Defenseman, they have a deep pool of talent.
May 2, 2021 at 1:29 a.m.
#49
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 2,384
Quoting: delneggs
Defenseman, they have a deep pool of talent.


As in? It’s got to be someone we immediately put into the top 4 and can play a shutdown role for 18-20 mins a night. And they need size. It can’t be a young guy, cause the rangers don’t really have young guys who are better than the group of heinola, Stanley and samberg (I don’t mean individually but collectively). Don’t see the rangers having that sorry. I mean, they have Trouba but....
May 2, 2021 at 2:20 a.m.
#50
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Quoting: arafay
As in? It’s got to be someone we immediately put into the top 4 and can play a shutdown role for 18-20 mins a night. And they need size. It can’t be a young guy, cause the rangers don’t really have young guys who are better than the group of heinola, Stanley and samberg (I don’t mean individually but collectively). Don’t see the rangers having that sorry. I mean, they have Trouba but....


You must not have seen K'Andre Miller play. He is a rookie playing over 20 minutes a game who is 6'5" and 210 lbs at 21 years of age. But not sure why you need a shut down guy for a 3rd line center anyway. If you want a top 4 shut down D, it will probably cost more than Lowry. But, that's just my opinion. I would not trade Miller straight up for Lowry anyway, so maybe not a good fit if that's how much the Jets want for him.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll