SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Created by: BruinsFan35
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: May 2, 2021
Published: May 2, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$925,000
1$800,000
4$4,000,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$5,000,000
1$5,000,000
4$6,250,000
2$2,500,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
    Protection List:
    Bergeron, Marchand, Pastrnak, Smith, Frederic, Coyle, DeBrusk
    McAvoy, Carlo, Grzelcyk
    Vladar
    SEA
    1. Ritchie, Nick [RFA Rights]
    2.
    BOS
    1. Bjorkstrand, Oliver
    Additional Details:
    This trade only happens if CBJ blows it up
    CBJ
    1. DeBrusk, Jake
    2. Hall, Curtis
    3. Moore, John
    4. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the TOR
    2022
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    2023
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the BOS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$77,054,841$1,956,507$182,500$4,445,159

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,125,000$6,125,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,666,667$6,666,667
    RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $6,250,000$6,250,000
    LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    C
    UFA
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,100,000$3,100,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
    $5,400,000$5,400,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
    RW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $800,000$800,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $3,687,500$3,687,500
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,900,000$4,900,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $850,000$850,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    UFA
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $725,000$725,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $925,000$925,000
    RW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 2, 2021 at 5:50 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    No way Columbus does that
    Friendly_Cannon, Ajp_18, EsoYeezus69 and 1 other person liked this.
    May 2, 2021 at 6:03 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 6,449
    Likes: 2,962
    No need to even look at the names other than Bjorkstrand. There's more than two assets in the return, therefore you're not offering anything whatsoever of quality, so absolutely not.
    May 2, 2021 at 6:13 p.m.
    #3
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    No way Columbus does that


    Its ok the bruins reject that immediately
    May 2, 2021 at 6:13 p.m.
    #4
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Thats awful for the bruins, easy reject
    May 2, 2021 at 6:26 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Its ok the bruins reject that immediately


    Care to explain why? Bjorkstrand is strictly better than DeBrusk and locked up long term, the rest of the pieces are pretty irrelevant
    May 2, 2021 at 7:09 p.m.
    #6
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 4,720
    Likes: 2,180
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Thats awful for the bruins, easy reject


    Joking right?
    Friendly_Cannon liked this.
    May 2, 2021 at 11:46 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 1,723
    Likes: 535
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Care to explain why? Bjorkstrand is strictly better than DeBrusk and locked up long term, the rest of the pieces are pretty irrelevant


    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    Joking right?


    bc it doesnt make any sense for the bruins to do this. Why get a top6 RW just to play him on 3LW? Just play JD there and save the assets. This ACGM smoking that good good.
    May 3, 2021 at 7:02 a.m.
    #8
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 4,720
    Likes: 2,180
    Quoting: KennyBoi
    bc it doesnt make any sense for the bruins to do this. Why get a top6 RW just to play him on 3LW? Just play JD there and save the assets. This ACGM smoking that good good.


    Probably because Bjorkstrand is significantly better than DeBrusk and Boston isn't giving up any serious assets for this?
    May 3, 2021 at 1:17 p.m.
    #9
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Care to explain why? Bjorkstrand is strictly better than DeBrusk and locked up long term, the rest of the pieces are pretty irrelevant


    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    Joking right?


    a 2nd is not irrelevent by any means.

    Hall and Moore can cancel out if you are that anti bruins, idc lmao

    Bjorkstrand is not a 2nd better than debrusk. Debrusk is younger and plays bigger... He is streaky, but thats the downside

    Objectively, bruins reject. Sorry man
    research will always win
    May 3, 2021 at 1:38 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    a 2nd is not irrelevent by any means.

    Hall and Moore can cancel out if you are that anti bruins, idc lmao

    Bjorkstrand is not a 2nd better than debrusk. Debrusk is younger and plays bigger... He is streaky, but thats the downside

    Objectively, bruins reject. Sorry man
    research will always win


    Research? Thats a weird way of spelling biased.

    Bjorkstrand is easily a 1st better than DeBrusk
    May 3, 2021 at 1:56 p.m.
    #11
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Research? Thats a weird way of spelling biased.

    Bjorkstrand is easily a 1st better than DeBrusk


    Not a single word there coulda been replaced with biased lmao
    so that joke was a fail hahahahaha

    and you are objectively wrong.
    So at least try to be right when making a point lmao

    That was a funny ass comment
    May 3, 2021 at 1:58 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Not a single word there coulda been replaced with biased lmao
    so that joke was a fail hahahahaha

    and you are objectively wrong.
    So at least try to be right when making a point lmao

    That was a funny ass comment


    Please elaborate on how I am objectively wrong because not a single team in the league would take DeBrusk and a 2nd over Bjorkstrand
    May 3, 2021 at 2:21 p.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Please elaborate on how I am objectively wrong because not a single team in the league would take DeBrusk and a 2nd over Bjorkstrand


    Just did a few times.

    You are the only one that hasnt provided information or stats lmao

    come on dude
    May 3, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Just did a few times.

    You are the only one that hasnt provided information or stats lmao

    come on dude


    What information or stats have you provided besides saying DeBrusk is 1 year younger? I've said quite clearly Bjorkstrand is locked up long term and a much better player
    May 3, 2021 at 9:08 p.m.
    #15
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    What information or stats have you provided besides saying DeBrusk is 1 year younger? I've said quite clearly Bjorkstrand is locked up long term and a much better player


    You are so ignorant its sad.

    idc lmao im right and thats all that matters
    May 3, 2021 at 10:22 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    You are so ignorant its sad.

    idc lmao im right and thats all that matters


    What an ironic statement laugh
    May 3, 2021 at 10:33 p.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    You are so ignorant its sad.

    idc lmao im right and thats all that matters


    The only one being ignorant here is you.
    From the picture below you can clearly see that Bjorkstrand is the much better player, its a black and white difference
    vBAbFVS.png
    May 4, 2021 at 10:19 a.m.
    #18
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    The only one being ignorant here is you.
    From the picture below you can clearly see that Bjorkstrand is the much better player, its a black and white difference
    vBAbFVS.png



    Scoring Goals Per Game Point Shares Adjusted
    Player Tm Lg Pos Season Age GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TOI G A PTS S OPS DPS PS G A PTS
    Jake Debrusk BOS NHLLW 2019-20 23 65 19 16 35 -1 14 12 7 0 5 161 11.8 1043 0.29 0.25 0.54 2.48 2.6 1.2 3.8 22 19 41
    Jack Hughes NJD NHLC 2019-20 18 61 7 14 21 -26 10 3 4 0 2 123 5.7 968 0.11 0.23 0.34 2.02 0.1 0.3 0.4 8 17

    Lmao
    current stats isnt everything - if it were, I woulda traded debrusk for hughes last year
    Take contract, potential, position, age, etc into account.
    you need to learn before commenting
    May 4, 2021 at 1:57 p.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Scoring Goals Per Game Point Shares Adjusted
    Player Tm Lg Pos Season Age GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TOI G A PTS S OPS DPS PS G A PTS
    Jake Debrusk BOS NHLLW 2019-20 23 65 19 16 35 -1 14 12 7 0 5 161 11.8 1043 0.29 0.25 0.54 2.48 2.6 1.2 3.8 22 19 41
    Jack Hughes NJD NHLC 2019-20 18 61 7 14 21 -26 10 3 4 0 2 123 5.7 968 0.11 0.23 0.34 2.02 0.1 0.3 0.4 8 17

    Lmao
    current stats isnt everything - if it were, I woulda traded debrusk for hughes last year
    Take contract, potential, position, age, etc into account.
    you need to learn before commenting


    LMFAO What? What the hell does jack Hughes, a very recent 1st overall rookie have to do with this? What I posted isnt current stats, thats a 3 year time frame (hint - it literally says that at the bottom of the image)

    You obviously have no idea what you are talking about, I hand you clear stats showing you the massive difference between the 2 players and you attempt to deflect it because you know you cant win

    "Research always wins"
    May 4, 2021 at 4:04 p.m.
    #20
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    LMFAO What? What the hell does jack Hughes, a very recent 1st overall rookie have to do with this? What I posted isnt current stats, thats a 3 year time frame (hint - it literally says that at the bottom of the image)

    You obviously have no idea what you are talking about, I hand you clear stats showing you the massive difference between the 2 players and you attempt to deflect it because you know you cant win

    "Research always wins"


    You really dont get it do you. Aight im out

    you are helpless lmao
    May 4, 2021 at 4:19 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    You really dont get it do you. Aight im out

    you are helpless lmao


    Get what? You never made a point. All you did was throw random bull**** at the wall to see what sticks.

    Are you trying to say DeBrusk was better than Hughes last year and that you wouldnt have traded them 1 for 1? Because thats a blatant lie. Boston would have taken that and run
    May 4, 2021 at 4:22 p.m.
    #22
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Get what? You never made a point. All you did was throw random bull**** at the wall to see what sticks.

    Are you trying to say DeBrusk was better than Hughes last year and that you wouldnt have traded them 1 for 1? Because thats a blatant lie. Boston would have taken that and run


    Lmao damn. Sad hahahahahaha
    May 4, 2021 at 4:31 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 37,912
    Likes: 19,289
    Quoting: FourthLiner
    Lmao damn. Sad hahahahahaha


    So youve turned to insults as your only answer. I see my time is wasted trying to have a debate with you at all. But alsa, i shouldn't expect anything else from children
    May 5, 2021 at 9:53 a.m.
    #24
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2021
    Posts: 105
    Likes: 25
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    So youve turned to insults as your only answer. I see my time is wasted trying to have a debate with you at all. But alsa, i shouldn't expect anything else from children


    Lmao, damn you really dont learn
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll