SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does this work

Created by: Gmonwy
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: May 4, 2021
Published: May 4, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Saw this on a recent posts comments
Trades
CGY
  1. Brännström, Erik
  2. Pinto, Shane
  3. 2021 1st round pick (OTT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$64,502,499$0$907,500$16,997,501
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$875,000$875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
LD/RD, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Does it work?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


May 4, 2021 at 12:51 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
May 4, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
I actually like how it looks on the Flames line up, I think it would definitely mean re signing Gaudreau and moving on from Monahan. Got to remember that Tkachuk's value may not be as high as it was before this year, a team trading for him would either need to sign him long term or qualify him at 9 million next year. Tough spot if he goes somewhere he doesn't want to be.
May 4, 2021 at 1:01 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
Quoting: PhatRas
I actually like how it looks on the Flames line up, I think it would definitely mean re signing Gaudreau and moving on from Monahan. Got to remember that Tkachuk's value may not be as high as it was before this year, a team trading for him would either need to sign him long term or qualify him at 9 million next year. Tough spot if he goes somewhere he doesn't want to be.


So keep Gaudreau if this happens? What could we realistically trade Monahan for?
May 4, 2021 at 1:01 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,971
Likes: 11,965
I don't think Ottawa should do this
Leafsfan416, csick, palhal and 1 other person liked this.
May 4, 2021 at 1:05 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
I’d love to see him in STL. They have some nice young players they could package up
May 4, 2021 at 1:05 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
So keep Gaudreau if this happens? What could we realistically trade Monahan for?


Gotta think Monahan's value would be high end to mid round second at this point, you'd assume the Flames would have to take back some significant money if they wanted a first round pick/high end NHL ready prospect.
May 4, 2021 at 1:06 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
Quoting: PhatRas
Gotta think Monahan's value would be high end to mid round second at this point, you'd assume the Flames would have to take back some significant money if they wanted a first round pick/high end NHL ready prospect.


Who would be interested in Monahan? Wild's GM has already said they aren't. Columbus maybe?
May 4, 2021 at 1:06 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
Quoting: Leafsfan416
I’d love to see him in STL. They have some nice young players they could package up


Like who?
May 4, 2021 at 1:09 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: Gmonwy
Like who?


Dunn + Kyrou + a mid level roster player (Sundkvist) 🤷‍♂️
May 4, 2021 at 1:13 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who would be interested in Monahan? Wild's GM has already said they aren't. Columbus maybe?


Rangers, Blue Jackets, Panthers, Sabres if they , maybe a Duchene+ deal with Nashville, Montreal if Danault walks, personally I think Vegas is a great fit in a move for a Marchassault or Smith
May 4, 2021 at 1:16 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
Quoting: PhatRas
Rangers, Blue Jackets, Panthers, Sabres if they , maybe a Duchene+ deal with Nashville, Montreal if Danault walks, personally I think Vegas is a great fit in a move for a Marchassault or Smith


What would have to be added for Marchassault?
May 4, 2021 at 1:23 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
What would have to be added for Marchassault?


Well it would take Marchassault waiving a NTC which might be hard to do to even get things moving, then I think it would be something along the lines of:

Marchessault and Carrier/McNabb or retain on Monahan to make money work

for

Monahan and a 3rd if the Knights are adding a player to the deal or Monahan @ 5 million
May 4, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 10,597
Quoting: PhatRas
Well it would take Marchassault waiving a NTC which might be hard to do to even get things moving, then I think it would be something along the lines of:

Marchessault and Carrier/McNabb or retain on Monahan to make money work

for

Monahan and a 3rd if the Knights are adding a player to the deal or Monahan 5 million


What about Smith when his M-NTC is over next year?
May 4, 2021 at 1:42 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: Gmonwy
What about Smith when his M-NTC is over next year?


Value wise I would think Vegas would add a touch. Maybe you look at a Smith McNabb package or Smith Carrier. Even just Smith and 4th kind of thin would work in my mind.
May 4, 2021 at 1:53 p.m.
#15
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,606
Likes: 23,771
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I don't think Ottawa should do this


I’d probably be more open to it if one of the Tkachuks or Stutzle can play centre but if Stutzle will be a winger, it might be tough to have a weak C depth.
athrin liked this.
May 4, 2021 at 2:02 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Flames decline they aren’t going to get sutter to come out of retirement to start a rebuild after him being here for 20 games. There’s 0% chance the flames accept this and 0% chance the flames enter a rebuild
May 4, 2021 at 2:08 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,971
Likes: 11,965
Quoting: csick
I’d probably be more open to it if one of the Tkachuks or Stutzle can play centre but if Stutzle will be a winger, it might be tough to have a weak C depth.


I think Sean Monahan makes more sense. Won't cost nearly as much, and he fits the role Ottawa is supposedly looking to fill. I think something in the ball park of White + two 2nds should get it done. Maybe it's a guy like Jarventie or Thomson instead of one of the 2nds if they'd prefer a prospect.
csick and PhatRas liked this.
May 4, 2021 at 2:42 p.m.
#18
gavinray
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 550
Too much from Ottawa and Matthew is a weasel who I dont want on the team
May 4, 2021 at 2:55 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: gavinray
Too much from Ottawa and Matthew is a weasel who I dont want on the team


Hahahah yeah right..
May 4, 2021 at 2:58 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames decline they aren’t going to get sutter to come out of retirement to start a rebuild after him being here for 20 games. There’s 0% chance the flames accept this and 0% chance the flames enter a rebuild


How on earth is getting an NHL ready do man and a right shot C that only has room to grow in a shallow C position starting a rebuild? This makes the Flames roster better after expansion no doubt about it.
Gmonwy liked this.
May 4, 2021 at 3:31 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: PhatRas
How on earth is getting an NHL ready do man and a right shot C that only has room to grow in a shallow C position starting a rebuild? This makes the Flames roster better after expansion no doubt about it.


It’s doesn’t upgrade them while sutter is here maybe in the future but right now brannstrom isn’t any better than a bottom pairing d man and pinto is an ahl player. And the value is still not there even if the flames were entering a rebuild
May 4, 2021 at 3:52 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: flamesfan
It’s doesn’t upgrade them while sutter is here maybe in the future but right now brannstrom isn’t any better than a bottom pairing d man and pinto is an ahl player. And the value is still not there even if the flames were entering a rebuild


I'm not sure what Sean Monahan you're thinking of but this is back to back half point per game season Sean Monahan we are talking about. Braanstrom projects to be similar to or better than Valimaki, that's a perfect bottom pairing D for next season and beyond. Pinto finished the college season with 32 point in 28 games, 13th in the country in points per game, jumped to the NHL and has three helpers in eight games on a bad team, that's not an AHL player whatsoever, that immediately fills the need for a right shot C behind Backlund.
May 4, 2021 at 3:59 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: PhatRas
I'm not sure what Sean Monahan you're thinking of but this is back to back half point per game season Sean Monahan we are talking about. Braanstrom projects to be similar to or better than Valimaki, that's a perfect bottom pairing D for next season and beyond. Pinto finished the college season with 32 point in 28 games, 13th in the country in points per game, jumped to the NHL and has three helpers in eight games on a bad team, that's not an AHL player whatsoever, that immediately fills the need for a right shot C behind Backlund.


So a bottom pairing defensmen and 4th line center are an improvement over a second line cente?
May 4, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 927
Likes: 305
Quoting: flamesfan
So a bottom pairing defensmen and 4th line center are an improvement over a second line cente?


That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, it actually shocks me that all you could understand from what was written is that.

Pinto probably looks like Batherson next year, Brannstrom is a huge upgrade on the D core that the Flames rolled out this year. If Tkachuk moves in a deal the left side behind him is still GAudreau, Mangiapane, Dube, Zary, Pelletier, MEP. Plus a top ten pick that could make an impact this season, PLUS, 7 million in cap room PLUS no need to pay Tkachuk 9 at the end of next season. This deal literally improves the Flames for next season and gives them room improve the RW and to sign a proper 2C (Danault, RNH) and ditch Monahan
May 4, 2021 at 4:19 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: PhatRas
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, it actually shocks me that all you could understand from what was written is that.

Pinto probably looks like Batherson next year, Brannstrom is a huge upgrade on the D core that the Flames rolled out this year. If Tkachuk moves in a deal the left side behind him is still GAudreau, Mangiapane, Dube, Zary, Pelletier, MEP. Plus a top ten pick that could make an impact this season, PLUS, 7 million in cap room PLUS no need to pay Tkachuk 9 at the end of next season. This deal literally improves the Flames for next season and gives them room improve the RW and to sign a proper 2C (Danault, RNH) and ditch Monahan


If you think tkachuk should be moved you clearly aren’t a flames fan and haven’t ever watched any flames games. Flames aren’t going to trade thier best player for a few prospects that could easily bust
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit