SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks Playoffs Next Season

Created by: jfrojelin
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 7, 2021
Published: May 7, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
NOTE: I think its idiotic for the Sharks to do anything but get Wright. HOWEVER, there are two teams in the normal pacific with a winning record. It's so possible that the Sharks make it next season, despite the good of the future
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$2,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$5,000,000
1$3,000,000
2$3,400,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
LAK
  1. Donato, Ryan [RFA Rights]
2.
SJS
SEA
  1. Burns, Brent
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan [Reserve List]
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$66,235,363$0$725,000$15,264,637
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$776,667$776,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$110,000$110K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 7, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 12,817
I’d rather just play Chmelevski then sign Zajac personally. The goalie change will be for sure happening but idk if the Sharks management will; firstly part with burns nor do I think they’re gonna keep pushing back Chmelevski or Chekhovich. If they do then it’s not a huge surprise but I don’t see value in signing a UFA then selling them for a 3rd or something. I’d rather keep letting the young guys impress. I do think we need help in the bottom 6 3C but unless it’s a good value seller then idk.
May 7, 2021 at 1:44 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: yikes
I’d rather just play Chmelevski then sign Zajac personally. The goalie change will be for sure happening but idk if the Sharks management will; firstly part with burns nor do I think they’re gonna keep pushing back Chmelevski or Chekhovich. If they do then it’s not a huge surprise but I don’t see value in signing a UFA then selling them for a 3rd or something. I’d rather keep letting the young guys impress. I do think we need help in the bottom 6 3C but unless it’s a good value seller then idk.


Sasha has seen much more success this year as a winger in the AHL its done wonders for him. Ivan's also a winger. I moved Dahlen, but who else could we move at wing?

Couture is out tonight, and Bob is sitting Sasha and playing Patty at 2C. I don't know what he can do given this coaching staff as well
yikes liked this.
May 7, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
#3
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 12,817
Quoting: jfrojelin
Sasha has seen much more success this year as a winger in the AHL its done wonders for him. Ivan's also a winger. I moved Dahlen, but who else could we move at wing?

Couture is out tonight, and Bob is sitting Sasha and playing Patty at 2C. I don't know what he can do given this coaching staff as well


Sorry I didn’t clarify, I’d rather use roster spots on Sasha and Chek. That would mean out of true, zajac, Blich, Gregor two would need to go. So I’d rather move true and Blich for but both have shown some upside if they can get a more defined role than constant call ups and reassignments. So that’s why I’d rather just lose zajac and pick between the remainders. Save the zajac money and maybe weaponize cap space again.

Yeah a terrible decision, Marleau should be retiring if not then I don’t mean anything against the guy but if he’s resigned than it’s terrible asset management for these young guys.
May 7, 2021 at 3:20 p.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,107
Likes: 25,024
A late third for Donato is the right value, but LA doesn't need a middle-6 leftie, what with Andersson, Athanasiou, Grundstrom, Lemieux and Moore behind Iafallo and Kempe.
May 7, 2021 at 3:53 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 2,867
Still wish we had sold on Donato at the deadline like I had wanted. At that point we probably could have gotten a late 2nd out of him if we also retained half his salary for this year.

What happened to Gambrell here tho?
Burnzie8_88_4Cup liked this.
May 8, 2021 at 12:25 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Still wish we had sold on Donato at the deadline like I had wanted. At that point we probably could have gotten a late 2nd out of him if we also retained half his salary for this year.

What happened to Gambrell here tho?


probably just trade him. He could be 4c i guess I like True more tho
May 9, 2021 at 5:59 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 520
Quoting: jfrojelin
probably just trade him. He could be 4c i guess I like True more tho




I'm the opposite, I'd continue with Gambrell at 4 C, get a vet for 3 C. I like that he's a righty, & he kills penalties which is important, True just looks stiff to me.
May 9, 2021 at 11:24 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
John Leonard Viewer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 444
Quoting: NjAHeRtL48
I'm the opposite, I'd continue with Gambrell at 4 C, get a vet for 3 C. I like that he's a righty, & he kills penalties which is important, True just looks stiff to me.


True is a PKer on the Sharks and cuda when playing. I like the size and some better vision. not much differentiates the two
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll