SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

is it possible to get eichel without kk or laf

Created by: BreadMan10972
Team: 2020-21 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: May 10, 2021
Published: May 10, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What is a reasonable return
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
BUF
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Lundkvist, Nils
  3. Strome, Ryan
  4. 2021 1st round pick (NYR)
  5. 2022 1st round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
strome or chytil
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2022
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$79,553,966$0$10,362,500$1,946,034
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,425,000$2,425,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,350,000$4,350,000
LD/RD, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$833,333$833,333
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$737,500$737,500
LD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,150,000$1,150,000 ($75,000$75K$75,000$75K)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 10, 2021 at 7:45 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 422
I think your proposal is close
May 10, 2021 at 7:47 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
I don’t think so
sabres89 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 7:49 p.m.
#3
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 1,530
No, because the Kings have too many assets who are centers.
May 10, 2021 at 7:50 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
anything is possible but its highly unlikely
May 10, 2021 at 7:53 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Depends if they love those prospects. They probably don’t. So probably no.
sabres89 and Ramus_Dahlin44 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 7:53 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 133
Likes: 50
Only player I think the Sabres would be interested in this trade would be Nils Lundkvist.

2 first rounds picks are pretty weak when he consider the 2021 draft is weak, also the 2022 first is likely to be a late round pick next year.

By trading Eichel it would mean another rebuild so Ryan strome wouldn't fit, also Kravtsov has 4 points in 20 games.
sabres89 liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 8:00 p.m.
#7
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 980
The package is very close. Honestly ppl are sleeping on how good Nils is, and kravtsov had his first cup of coffee in the nhl and looks good (can’t wait till he gets actual PP time). If Buffalo wants more of a known player I would sub buch for kravtsov and lower one of the firsts
May 10, 2021 at 8:01 p.m.
#8
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,925
Likes: 26,426
Probably not. A team could outbid the Rangers
GoodIdeaAtTheTime liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 8:05 p.m.
#9
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,510
Likes: 3,230
I don’t think eichel is the right answer in ny, 10 million hit is going to mess with the budget going forward with a shestrrkin, fox and some of the kids contracts coming. Bargain hunt the 2c got to be able to find somebody playing over there contract over a 10 million dollar player plus assets, Rangers team will draw major ufa interest with that base coming also
May 10, 2021 at 8:20 p.m.
#10
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 976
Quoting: Ramus_Dahlin44
Kravtsov has 4 points in 20 games.


I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.
GoodIdeaAtTheTime liked this.
May 10, 2021 at 8:27 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 39,600
Likes: 18,154
Quoting: MelonVK
I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.


Ditto this.
With young players, you can probably get as much information by TOI/gp than you can with pts/gp.
May 10, 2021 at 9:05 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 941
Likes: 606
Quoting: MelonVK
I don't know if everyone on this board has alzheimers disease, but Eichels first season was garbage. His 2nd season too. It was in 18/19 he started outshooting his opponents, relatively. Last year I'd consider him a top player, and from what we saw this year he's *finally* one of the best players in the league.

This idea that every prospect has to be great from the start is super weird and not how we know most good players - unless you're literally only looking at point production. Most rookies get somewhat outshot. Jack Hughes had a garbage d+1 season but is already looking like one of the better players in the league. It can turn around quickly. If you're down on prospects that have looked really good up until the NHL level because of a poor showing in a small sample size, you'll be doing a lot of player evaluation revision later.


Talking too much sense. This is the internet.
May 10, 2021 at 10:02 p.m.
#13
2285 Stanley Cup Cha
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 480
Maybe but it sure as hell isn't possible without chytil
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll