1. Farabee
2. Johnson
3. Marchand
4. Pacioretty
5. Horvat
6. Karlsson
7. McAvoy
8. Theodore
9. Malkin
10. Aho

My honest opinions please don't attack.

Farabee
Nylander
Rantanen
O’Reilly
Dubois
Monahan
McAvoy
Theodore
Malkin
Aho

Farabee
Nylander
Marchand
O'Reilly
Horvat
Karlsson
McAvoy
Theodore
Malkin
Aho

Farabee
Nylander
Marchand (But I could be swayed either way)
ROR
Horvat
Karlsson
McAvoy
Theodore
Tkachuk
Aho

I can accept that opinion but Johnson over Nylander really? 🤨

Farabee
Nylander
Marchand
O’Reilly
Dubois
Monahan
McAvoy
Theodore
Malkin
Aho

I only truly disagree with the Rantanen pick, Marchand has been better especially given Pastrnak missed the first 10 games and has not produced as well given his return from Surgery. Marchand has 69 points. I still respect your pick, it's pretty close

Farabee
Nylander
Marchand
ROR
Dubois
Monahan
Mcavoy
Malkin
Aho

Well tbh we'd have to see how Johnson would do on a non-stacked team thanks for respecting my opinion.

Farabee
Nylander
Rantanen
O'Reilly
Horvat
Karlsson
McAvoy
Theodore
Tkachuk
Aho

Accidently quoted this mb I can't delete it

Farabee
Nylander offensively (Johnson every other catagory)
Rantanen (only cause I would never admit that ratboy is better lol)
O'Rielly
Horvat
Karlsson
Orlov
Theodore
Tkachuk
Aho

Batherson, Nylander, Marchand, O'Reilly, Dubois, Karlsson, McAvoy, Theodore, Malkin, Aho.

You're at least honest.

I had Farabee over Batherson and Horvat over dubois

I think Batherson could be better but he only has 1 year compared to 2 by Farabee. Too early to tell but for now Farabee is leading

There's a case I guess but I went with Dubois. IMO he can be a good 1C, Horvat more of a 2C. That being said, Horvat has a more difficult role since he starts more often in the D-zone and faces the top lines more than Dubois.

Maybe I would change the Batherson pick.

So it's McAvoy > Theodore = Orlov >> Rielly

Malkin > Marchand = Nylander = ROR = William Karlsson >= Rantanen = Tkachuk > Pacioretty >>> PLD > Horvat = Aho = Johnson = Batherson > Monahan > Farabee > Zibanejad
*IF* we exclude shooting impacts. Now, a lot of these guys are really good at that - Rantanen, Patches, Zibanejad, Marchand and Aho might move up because of it. Karlsson, Monahan might move down.

But in terms of playing impact. In terms of every aspect of their game counting before their individual shot impacts happen at puck release, that's the rough outlining. Everyone left of, and including, Pacioretty is basically a high-end-1st-line-to-elite-level player. Monahan and Farabee are bad-ish and Zibanejad has a horrendous year. He was amazing just a few seasons ago, so hopefully he can regain form, but it's not looking very promising as of now.

As always, everyone else is incorrect because you've watched fewer cha- games than me. Please refrain from @-ing me if you're going to beg the question: like "Why don't you have Aho down as elite? We *know* he is elite". Then I'm going to say "he's not", you're going to say "but he is" and we won't get anywhere. If you want to argue, which I don't mind, please tell me *why* this order should change so that I can tell you that I don't care about point totals or draft position. Thanks!