SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tkachuk with Colorado

Created by: Erkadurk347
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2021
Published: May 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,000,000
2$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$7,500,000
6$5,000,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
COL
SEA
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (COL)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (COL)
2.
COL
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
Additional Details:
Tkachuk extends in Colorado.
CGY
  1. Donskoi, Joonas
  2. Foudy, Jean-Luc [Reserve List]
  3. Francouz, Pavel
  4. Helleson, Drew [Reserve List]
  5. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
  6. Kamenev, Vladislav [Reserve List]
  7. Sherwood, Kiefer [RFA Rights]
  8. Werner, Adam [RFA Rights]
  9. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
  10. 2022 1st round pick (COL)
  11. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$82,063,129$1,741,463$4,737,500-$563,129

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LW
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 13, 2021 at 6:56 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Flames decline a bunch of garbage and late firsts aren’t even close to getting tkachuk
Gmonwy and EsoYeezus69 liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 6:57 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 280
Likes: 133
I feel like that’s a whole lot of nothing going to Calgary. A bunch of garbage 27+ first rounders and not one Colorados top young players. Doubt this gets it done
EsoYeezus69, csick and lolz1234 liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 6:58 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,251
Likes: 19,514
wtf is this?
EsoYeezus69 and csick liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:05 p.m.
#4
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Eleven assets 🤯

And Matchuk is just *checks notes* one asset

10 more assets why they'd be fools to not take it

Wait a sec

🧐
Xqb15a and TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:07 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 1,238
If CGY is trading Tkachuk, its a full 100% explosion rebuild.

Youre asking them to blow up their team, and *this* is what you offer?
Gmonwy liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:08 p.m.
#6
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Ok Devil's Avocado 👹🥑

~ deep breath

That offer really isn't *that* bad ultimately

One of Jost Werner Helle 1sts will become very good

And it's just a ton of useful assets like so many lol

At some point quantity *can* outweigh quality
Xqb15a and TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:11 p.m.
#7
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 2,691
I think CAL is limited to 94 Contracts.
Radu47 and Xqb15a liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:12 p.m.
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: Canadianfan543
I feel like that’s a whole lot of nothing going to Calgary. A bunch of garbage 27+ first rounders and not one Colorados top young players. Doubt this gets it done


Those aren't garbage obviously 🙄

But definitely underwhelming

In other theoretical here people value late 1sts wayyy differently it's just the unique way this return is constructed that make them look less valuable
Habs696969 and TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:12 p.m.
#9
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: McGruff
I think CAL is limited to 94 Contracts.


They'll just take on so many contracts it's impossible for the league to count them all bwahaha
awesome face
McGruff, Xqb15a and TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:15 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 280
Likes: 133
Quoting: Radu47
Those aren't garbage obviously 🙄

But definitely underwhelming

In other theoretical here people value late 1sts wayyy differently it's just the unique way this return is constructed that make them look less valuable


You are right underwhelming is the correct word there. I personally think a young player like tkachuk would need a player of similar age or a bit younger in return that is proven NHLer or an A Nhl prospect
May 13, 2021 at 7:17 p.m.
#11
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,819
Quoting: Radu47
Ok Devil's Avocado 👹🥑

~ deep breath

That offer really isn't *that* bad ultimately

One of Jost Werner Helle 1sts will become very good

And it's just a ton of useful assets like so many lol

At some point quantity *can* outweigh quality


Jost + Byram + Helleson and a 1st would be a good offer.
May 13, 2021 at 7:38 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,352
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames decline a bunch of garbage and late firsts aren’t even close to getting tkachuk


There is definitely some zero value stuff in there ie Kamenev, Sherwood, Werner. But there is some really good stuff in there too, Helleson is a great d prospect top pairing potential, Foudy the same his skating is HIGH level how he wasn’t a 1st rd pick I don’t know, Jost has turned into 3rd line top pk metric monster, and 3 1st rd picks. Regardless the Avs aren’t trading 11 assets for Tkachuk and CGY isn’t trading him. It’s a ridiculous trade proposal.
TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,352
Likes: 9,005
Quoting: csick
Jost + Byram + Helleson and a 1st would be a good offer.

That’s the kind of offer that gets a 1C, Byram is untouchable for the duration of his elc.
TJTwolf liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:43 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 4,915
COL would be send Newhook or Byram at the least
Gmonwy and KINGS67 liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 7:52 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 1,620
You forgot newhook
Gmonwy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll