SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

For all those interested in the Sharks assets

Created by: yikes
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 14, 2021
Published: May 14, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
More for discussion than argument so let’s keep it clean!

As I said the Sharks likely are only taking favourable trades (If you don’t wanna read my details lol). I doubt any major trades actually happen. But it’s worth listening on for all parties (Hertl getting a chance a cup future, Labanc as well, and the Sharks rejuvenate their future while still deploying a competitive roster; not cup winners by any means).
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
1$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$6,000,000
Trades
1.
SJS
    I by NO means am a expert or always right. But for those inquiring on Hertl, Labanc, Meier as primary targets for acquisitions the Sharks are not selling cheap.


    THE SHARKS PLAN CURRENTLY;

    - Make playoffs next season
    - Acquire a solid 3C
    - Acquire a legit starter or starter potential
    - Shed a contract for cheap
    - We have a surplus of wingers/ players who need jobs

    This means quality assets that should’ve been sold if we rebuilt are going to require overpays. So whether it’s worth it or not is not what matters. What matters is for the Sharks to compete: Hertl is a X factor in that matter. Meier as well is expendable yet would be a huge piece. Labanc is the easiest trade piece but the opinion on him is mixed.

    So I’m any situation the Sharks only cause to trade a key top 6 player would be an overpay or for equal to or better improvement elsewhere in their lineup.

    So generally I would say most teams wouldn’t find it worth their time paying a ransom for Hertl unless he came extended and Meier likely will just cost too much.

    Leaving Labanc as the best asset for price tbh.

    Gregor, Balcers, Donato are likely the cheaper candidates but Gregor having the most upside and still cheap. Donato being a mixed bag and cheaper. And Balcers being good but also a mixed bag.

    Leading to Gregor or Labanc being the best targets from the Sharks.
    BOS
    2.
    SJS
      These are my favoured trades/ landing spots.
      BOS
      3.
      SJS
      1. Chytil, Filip [RFA Rights]
      2. Georgiev, Alexandar
      3. Schneider, Braden
      4. 2021 1st round pick (NYR)
      Additional Details:
      Top 10-15 Selection

      This is an EXPENSIVE trade for the rangers, Hertl must come with an extension for this to happen and also this is an overpay imo which is the requirement as I said.

      Is this worth the NYR time... imo yea and no but as I said; if the Sharks plan on competing which is legitimately their verbal plan, they won’t move their star Center for cheap.
      NYR
      1. Hertl, Tomas
      2. 2021 5th round pick (COL)
      Additional Details:
      I think Boston would ask on Hertl but not be worth the price versus the amount of assets they own. I find NYR asking and pitching hard for him.
      4.
      SJS
        Maybe I’m high on Chytil and Schneider so I may get told this is a fair offer by some but Chytil is a great young center, I love Schneider, I think Georgiev has room to grow, and 10-15 could be good if we see see Sillinger, Lambos or a guy fall from the top 10. That’s a big return.
        NYR
          Should the rangers do this....eh I wouldn’t be surprised but if I was a rangers fan I wouldn’t love/ like the deal.
          5.
          SJS
          1. Heponiemi, Aleksi
          2. Levi, Devon [Reserve List]
          3. 2021 1st round pick (FLA)
          FLA
          1. Labanc, Kevin
          Additional Details:
          The Sharks would not sell Labanc cheap as they’re very high on him and he had a good year. We could see a more expensive fee than this tbh. Like Denisenko instead of two prospects. Which would be a scary fee for Florida.

          Labanc with reliable defensive forwards to his side would allow him to play his game more and I think this is a great landing spot for him from the teams that would pitch on him.
          6.
          SJS
            Once again another overpay and Florida should be in on buying for a cup run. Buuuut I think a Center like Hertl, or other available top 6 centers are better trade assets.
            FLA
            7.
            SJS
              Kent Johnson, C/W
              Cole Sillinger, C
              Corson Ceulemans, D
              SEA
              1. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
              2. 2021 1st round pick (NYR)
              3. 2021 1st round pick (FLA)
              8.
              SJS
                Seattle Selects:

                GAMBRELL
                SEA
                1. Gambrell, Dylan [RFA Rights]
                9.
                SJS
                1. 2021 3rd round pick (SEA)
                2. 2021 5th round pick (SEA)
                Additional Details:
                PLACEHOLDER TEAM ACQUIRES THESE WINGERS
                SEA
                1. Blichfeld, Joachim [RFA Rights]
                2. Donato, Ryan [RFA Rights]
                10.
                SJS
                  A new and exciting pipeline:

                  Bordeleau Johnson
                  Schneider Merkley
                  Sillinger Robens
                  Ceulemans Hatakka Kniazev
                  Melnichuk Levi

                  Dahlen Hepo making season/ rookie debuts for us
                  SEA
                  11.
                  SJS
                    Also I’m in love with a:

                    Leonard - Krejci - Wiesblatt trio

                    I think that’s such a fun line to think of
                    SEA
                    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
                    2021
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SEA
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the TOR
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SEA
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    2022
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the BUF
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the MIN
                    2023
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    Logo of the SJS
                    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
                    21$81,500,000$61,043,696$0$1,707,500$20,456,304
                    Left WingCentreRight Wing
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $2,108,696$2,108,696
                    LW, RW
                    NMC
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $8,000,000$8,000,000
                    C
                    M-NTC
                    UFA - 6
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $1,000,000$1,000,000
                    RW, LW
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $3,000,000$3,000,000
                    LW, RW
                    UFA - 2
                    $3,500,000$3,500,000
                    C, LW
                    UFA - 2
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
                    C
                    RFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
                    LW, RW
                    RFA - 1
                    $6,000,000$6,000,000
                    C
                    UFA
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $866,667$866,667
                    RW
                    RFA - 4
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $1,250,000$1,250,000
                    LW, RW
                    RFA - 1
                    Logo of the Florida Panthers
                    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
                    LW, C
                    RFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $900,000$900,000
                    LW, RW
                    UFA - 1
                    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $796,667$796,667
                    LD/RD
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $10,000,000$10,000,000
                    RD
                    NMC
                    UFA - 6
                    Logo of the New York Rangers
                    $2,425,000$2,425,000
                    G
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
                    LD
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $5,280,000$5,280,000
                    RD
                    M-NTC
                    UFA - 4
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $1,250,000$1,250,000
                    G
                    RFA - 1
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $2,250,000$2,250,000
                    LD/RD
                    UFA - 3
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
                    RD
                    UFA - 2
                    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $7,000,000$7,000,000
                    LD/RD
                    NMC
                    UFA - 5
                    Taxi Squad
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $1,250,000$1,250,000 ($125,000$125K$125,000$125K)
                    LW, RW
                    UFA - 2
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $776,667$776,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$110,000$110K)
                    C, LW
                    UFA - 1
                    Logo of the New York Rangers
                    $925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
                    RD
                    RFA - 3
                    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
                    $2,000,000$2,000,000 ($875,000$875K$875,000$875K)
                    G
                    UFA - 1

                    Embed Code

                    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
                    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

                    Text-Embed

                    Click to Highlight
                    May 14, 2021 at 4:54 p.m.
                    #1
                    NoWah49
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Feb. 2018
                    Posts: 4,865
                    Likes: 1,432
                    this is if Wilson plays his cards right imo, best case scenario
                    May 14, 2021 at 4:56 p.m.
                    #2
                    Thread Starter
                    EklundCelebriniSmith
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Sep. 2019
                    Posts: 10,059
                    Likes: 12,817
                    Quoting: NoWah49
                    this is if Wilson plays his cards right imo, best case scenario


                    All of which I never see happening tho! As this is way to close to a rebuild and the Sharks said they fully plan on rostering a playoff contender. So unless they free fall and sell at TDL; we likely won’t see a sale, and likely won’t ever see giant returns. Although I believe as you said: this is the best scenario if we do somehow wind up here as Krejci and Chytil could easily fill the Hertl void. And the pure youth influx would go a long way for the future of the organization.
                    NoWah49 and Rob32sjsharks liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 4:59 p.m.
                    #3
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 6,390
                    Likes: 4,459
                    The Sharks have a real challenge ahead, if the team doesn’t make the playoffs next season is a rebuild happening or is it not in the cards?
                    May 14, 2021 at 5:01 p.m.
                    #4
                    Thread Starter
                    EklundCelebriniSmith
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Sep. 2019
                    Posts: 10,059
                    Likes: 12,817
                    Quoting: tryger
                    The Sharks have a real challenge ahead, if the team doesn’t make the playoffs next season is a rebuild happening or is it not in the cards?


                    If they fail AGAIN and don’t rebuild next year I fully believe there is a delusion in management and owner ship and we would be the new buffalo. That would be a monumental flaw in being a losing team 3 years in a row and doing nothing to actually improve but actually get worse and lose assets for nothing/ age and become little value.

                    If I ran the Sharks we woulda already started selling in 2020 and be on a path towards success in the 23-25 years full of youth.

                    Their current “plan” isn’t the worst in the world but it’s not the best. And if they keep the same mentality after another failed year it would be detrimental for years to come. Failed meaning even missing the playoffs by a single point or tiebreaker, anything but playoffs should result in gutting some of the team or making major changes internally.
                    tryger liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 5:16 p.m.
                    #5
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 6,390
                    Likes: 4,459
                    Quoting: yikes
                    If they fail AGAIN and don’t rebuild next year I fully believe there is a delusion in management and owner ship and we would be the new buffalo. That would be a monumental flaw


                    I sort of understand why though, the Karlsson trade was to obtain that player to push a deep playoff team over the top. I think you guys will pick a balanced approach: manage to trade down a few times and fill some prospect pool holes, buyout Jones, sign Andersen, keep Hertl, and bargain shop for one or more of: Patrick, Kotkaniemi, or Drouin. I don’t see the Kings, Ducks, or Coyotes making the playoffs barring landing a big surprise. But getting past Vegas or the oilers will be tough.
                    May 14, 2021 at 5:18 p.m.
                    #6
                    Once a Kings Fan Too
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 40,088
                    Likes: 25,004
                    I find it hard to believe that the Rangers would give you all three of those players PLUS the 16th overall pick in this draft (it's locked in unless NY wins one of the two lotteries). But if you DID acquire that pick, you might want to give some consideration to Jesper Wallstedt. I can't see any team other than Calgary or Dallas ahead of you taking him, so he should still be on the board.
                    OutCold13 liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 5:41 p.m.
                    #7
                    Thread Starter
                    EklundCelebriniSmith
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Sep. 2019
                    Posts: 10,059
                    Likes: 12,817
                    Quoting: OldNYIfan
                    I find it hard to believe that the Rangers would give you all three of those players PLUS the 16th overall pick in this draft (it's locked in unless NY wins one of the two lotteries). But if you DID acquire that pick, you might want to give some consideration to Jesper Wallstedt. I can't see any team other than Calgary or Dallas ahead of you taking him, so he should still be on the board.

                    Yeah as I said; overpay otherwise it wouldn’t happen.

                    But if it did: I think the Sharks should grab Wallstedt within reason. Like if we pick 6th than rangers let’s say pick 16... I don’t think he’ll be there 16 but idk if picking him 6th is a good move. It’s a real tough decision. I think someone would pick him before 16; I could see Chicago, VAN, and the two you mentioned grabbing him. Maybe grab 16 and trade up if he’s not picked at 7-10.

                    It’s a mess really ( like my post lol ).
                    OldNYIfan liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 5:49 p.m.
                    #8
                    Once a Kings Fan Too
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 40,088
                    Likes: 25,004
                    Quoting: yikes
                    Yeah as I said; overpay otherwise it wouldn’t happen.

                    But if it did: I think the Sharks should grab Wallstedt within reason. Like if we pick 6th than rangers let’s say pick 16... I don’t think he’ll be there 16 but idk if picking him 6th is a good move. It’s a real tough decision. I think someone would pick him before 16; I could see Chicago, VAN, and the two you mentioned grabbing him. Maybe grab 16 and trade up if he’s not picked at 7-10.

                    It’s a mess really ( like my post lol ).


                    Chicago has Lankinen and Vancouver has both Demko and DiPietro, so I don't see them picking Wallstedt. Calgary's pick is number 10 or 11, so they may not want to invest that high a pick on a goalie, especially in this under-scouted draft.

                    Some idiot so-called pundit had New Jersey taking him at #4 and then Detroit taking Sebastian Cossa at #6.
                    May 14, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.
                    #9
                    Thread Starter
                    EklundCelebriniSmith
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Sep. 2019
                    Posts: 10,059
                    Likes: 12,817
                    Quoting: OldNYIfan
                    Chicago has Lankinen and Vancouver has both Demko and DiPietro, so I don't see them picking Wallstedt. Calgary's pick is number 10 or 11, so they may not want to invest that high a pick on a goalie, especially in this under-scouted draft.

                    Some idiot so-called pundit had New Jersey taking him at #4 and then Detroit taking Sebastian Cossa at #6.


                    Yeah those are odd picks, New Jersey is all in on Hughes I’d say if he’s available otherwise I like Powers (if falls) or winger for them. Detroit could take Jesper imo but I’d like to see them stack some more D up or a #1 c type draft.
                    OldNYIfan liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 6:33 p.m.
                    #10
                    Once a Kings Fan Too
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 40,088
                    Likes: 25,004
                    Quoting: yikes
                    Yeah those are odd picks, New Jersey is all in on Hughes I’d say if he’s available otherwise I like Powers (if falls) or winger for them. Detroit could take Jesper imo but I’d like to see them stack some more D up or a #1 c type draft.


                    I think that Detroit's all over Johnson if he's still there.
                    yikes liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 7:15 p.m.
                    #11
                    Hockey Fan13
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Oct. 2019
                    Posts: 3,916
                    Likes: 2,487
                    I like the new found center depth. It fits Dougs quasi youth movement.
                    Krejci is a great add but I think he retires a Bruin, but they have forced out other aging players so maybe.
                    What sucks is the impending Eichel trade will probably hold up all the other trades, with GMs fearing they could be moving a piece Sabres want.
                    yikes and OldNYIfan liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 7:24 p.m.
                    #12
                    Grierless Sharks Fan
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Dec. 2017
                    Posts: 2,956
                    Likes: 927
                    Quoting: tryger
                    I sort of understand why though, the Karlsson trade was to obtain that player to push a deep playoff team over the top. I think you guys will pick a balanced approach: manage to trade down a few times and fill some prospect pool holes, buyout Jones, sign Andersen, keep Hertl, and bargain shop for one or more of: Patrick, Kotkaniemi, or Drouin. I don’t see the Kings, Ducks, or Coyotes making the playoffs barring landing a big surprise. But getting past Vegas or the oilers will be tough.


                    I can see the Kings getting in.
                    yikes liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 7:27 p.m.
                    #13
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: May 2016
                    Posts: 11,499
                    Likes: 4,566
                    Quoting: OutCold13
                    I like the new found center depth. It fits Dougs quasi youth movement.
                    Krejci is a great add but I think he retires a Bruin, but they have forced out other aging players so maybe.
                    What sucks is the impending Eichel trade will probably hold up all the other trades, with GMs fearing they could be moving a piece Sabres want.


                    Who did Boston force out?
                    May 14, 2021 at 8:00 p.m.
                    #14
                    Hockey Fan13
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Oct. 2019
                    Posts: 3,916
                    Likes: 2,487
                    Quoting: ON3M4N
                    Who did Boston force out?


                    Chara.
                    May 14, 2021 at 8:06 p.m.
                    #15
                    In Zito We Trust
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Oct. 2020
                    Posts: 2,790
                    Likes: 1,596
                    That is pricey for Labanc lol. Would rather trade for Meier and spend more
                    Rob32sjsharks liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 8:47 p.m.
                    #16
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: May 2016
                    Posts: 11,499
                    Likes: 4,566
                    Quoting: OutCold13
                    Chara.


                    Didn't force him out at all lol. They offered him more money than WSH, they just wanted him to play less minutes. Chara didn't want that and left for WSH.....where he ended up playing less minutes anyways lol.
                    OutCold13 liked this.
                    May 14, 2021 at 11:58 p.m.
                    #17
                    Hockey Fan13
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Oct. 2019
                    Posts: 3,916
                    Likes: 2,487
                    Quoting: ON3M4N
                    Didn't force him out at all lol. They offered him more money than WSH, they just wanted him to play less minutes. Chara didn't want that and left for WSH.....where he ended up playing less minutes anyways lol.


                    Thanks for clearing that up.
                    May 15, 2021 at 1:51 a.m.
                    #18
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Apr. 2020
                    Posts: 11,140
                    Likes: 4,636
                    Quoting: yikes
                    All of which I never see happening tho! As this is way to close to a rebuild and the Sharks said they fully plan on rostering a playoff contender. So unless they free fall and sell at TDL; we likely won’t see a sale, and likely won’t ever see giant returns. Although I believe as you said: this is the best scenario if we do somehow wind up here as Krejci and Chytil could easily fill the Hertl void. And the pure youth influx would go a long way for the future of the organization.


                    Quoting: tryger
                    The Sharks have a real challenge ahead, if the team doesn’t make the playoffs next season is a rebuild happening or is it not in the cards?


                    Quoting: yikes
                    If they fail AGAIN and don’t rebuild next year I fully believe there is a delusion in management and owner ship and we would be the new buffalo. That would be a monumental flaw in being a losing team 3 years in a row and doing nothing to actually improve but actually get worse and lose assets for nothing/ age and become little value.

                    If I ran the Sharks we woulda already started selling in 2020 and be on a path towards success in the 23-25 years full of youth.

                    Their current “plan” isn’t the worst in the world but it’s not the best. And if they keep the same mentality after another failed year it would be detrimental for years to come. Failed meaning even missing the playoffs by a single point or tiebreaker, anything but playoffs should result in gutting some of the team or making major changes internally.


                    Sharks will never say they are in rebuild mode... yet this year they never signed any big name and in the trade deadline they sold a player and used cap space to pick up assets..... they sharks are in rebuild mode but they can’t actually say it, you just have to look at what they do and see the rebuild.
                    tryger liked this.
                    May 15, 2021 at 1:53 a.m.
                    #19
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Apr. 2020
                    Posts: 11,140
                    Likes: 4,636
                    Quoting: tryger
                    I sort of understand why though, the Karlsson trade was to obtain that player to push a deep playoff team over the top. I think you guys will pick a balanced approach: manage to trade down a few times and fill some prospect pool holes, buyout Jones, sign Andersen, keep Hertl, and bargain shop for one or more of: Patrick, Kotkaniemi, or Drouin. I don’t see the Kings, Ducks, or Coyotes making the playoffs barring landing a big surprise. But getting past Vegas or the oilers will be tough.


                    Anderson would be Jones 2.0 I’m hoping for younger like Dreidger from Florida he has more upside.
                    tryger liked this.
                    May 15, 2021 at 1:56 a.m.
                    #20
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Apr. 2020
                    Posts: 11,140
                    Likes: 4,636
                    Quoting: yikes
                    Yeah as I said; overpay otherwise it wouldn’t happen.

                    But if it did: I think the Sharks should grab Wallstedt within reason. Like if we pick 6th than rangers let’s say pick 16... I don’t think he’ll be there 16 but idk if picking him 6th is a good move. It’s a real tough decision. I think someone would pick him before 16; I could see Chicago, VAN, and the two you mentioned grabbing him. Maybe grab 16 and trade up if he’s not picked at 7-10.

                    It’s a mess really ( like my post lol ).
                    May 16, 2021 at 6:44 p.m.
                    #21
                    Avatar of the user
                    Joined: Jun. 2018
                    Posts: 6,390
                    Likes: 4,459
                    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
                    Anderson would be Jones 2.0 I’m hoping for younger like Dreidger from Florida he has more upside.


                    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
                    Anderson would be Jones 2.0 I’m hoping for younger like Dreidger from Florida he has more upside.


                    Totally understandable.
                     
                    Reply
                    To create a post please Login or Register
                    Question:
                    Options:
                    Add Option
                    Submit Poll