SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

three way

Created by: aidenplayhockey
Published: May 17, 2021 at 1:49 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 27/116 (23%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the Calgary FlamesCalgary Flames

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Lindholm, EliasCalgary FlamesNHL-$1,128,879111---0000--
Hanifin, NoahCalgary FlamesNHL-$1,152,155111---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Burns, BrentSan Jose SharksNHL-$1,862,068111---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial-$1,633,9572843663910
Change$418,966-1-1-1000
Final-$1,214,991 (↑)27 (↓)42 (↓)65 (↓)3910000

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Burns, BrentSan Jose SharksNHL-$1,862,068111---0000--
Donato, RyanSan Jose SharksNHL-$442,241111---0000--
Gambrell, DylanSan Jose SharksNHL-$162,931111---0000--
2021 4th round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---001------
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Goodrow, BarclayTampa Bay LightningNHL-$215,301111---0000--
Lindholm, EliasCalgary FlamesNHL-$1,128,879111---0000--
Hanifin, NoahCalgary FlamesNHL-$1,152,155111---0000--
Sergachev, MikhailTampa Bay LightningNHL-$1,117,241111---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial-$1,782,4992546633514
Change-$1,146,336111-10-1
Final-$2,928,835 (↓)26 (↑)47 (↑)64 (↑)2 (↓)513 (↓)000

Logo of the Tampa Bay LightningTampa Bay Lightning

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $25,475,000
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: $19,738,758
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Goodrow, BarclayTampa Bay LightningNHL-$925,000111---0000--
Sergachev, MikhailTampa Bay LightningNHL-$4,800,000111---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Donato, RyanSan Jose SharksNHL-$1,900,000111---0000--
Gambrell, DylanSan Jose SharksNHL-$700,000111---0000--
2021 4th round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---001------
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,736,2423348682314
Change$3,125,000000101
Final$8,861,242 (↑)3348683 (↑)315 (↑)000
May 17, 2021 at 1:55 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,668
Likes: 4,791
CAL isn't moving Hanafin, esp to take on a worn out and expensive Brett Burns
TB isn't moving Sergachev for that return
SJ would do this in a heartbeat
Rhea, mikearky, M0LSON and 1 other person liked this.
May 17, 2021 at 2:35 p.m.
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,595
Likes: 10,888
Calgary has no reason to do this
Rhea, Dutchies, mikearky and 2 others liked this.
May 17, 2021 at 4:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 1,866
So SJ makes out like bandits and the other 2, especially Calgary get screwed?
Gmonwy, Dutchies and mikearky liked this.
May 18, 2021 at 10:20 a.m.
#4
Icedragon4405
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 453
There is no point of this trade for either team.
mikearky liked this.
May 18, 2021 at 12:02 p.m.
#5
arky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 6,761
Likes: 4,370
San Jose clears a bad contract and gets the best players
Gmonwy and Dutchies liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 8:08 a.m.
#6
SENS FAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 184
Likes: 37
Just think about the name of the trade before you post it.

Calgary would not go for Burns whos soon to decline and trade a player like Hanifin nor would they trade Lindholm for this. Calgary is kinda in a rebuild!

Tampa doesn't give up on Sergchev for almost nothing other then a first in a couple of years.
May 19, 2021 at 1:27 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
That’s terrible for calgary and tampa like horrible for them
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll