SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Donttradedougies Eichel deal for next year

Created by: Gmonwy
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: May 22, 2021
Published: May 22, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Only happens if Gaudreau signs a contract around 8.5x6 or more
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,425,000
2$2,425,000
1$787,500
1$787,500
1$787,500
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
  2. Zary, Connor
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
13th pick range only happens if Gaudreau aggres to a long term extension
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$65,764,999$0$15,000$15,735,001
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$801,666$801,666 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
G
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,425,000$1,425,000
LD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 22, 2021 at 2:12 p.m.
#1
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 2,064
The Flames would be the team to throw ridiculous money at Landeskog. They shouldn't. It will age like the Lucic deal. Power forwards don't age gracefully. I say that as someone that really likes Landeskog.
GoodIdeaAtTheTime liked this.
May 22, 2021 at 2:13 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: ItWasIn
The Flames would be the team to throw ridiculous money at Landeskog. They shouldn't. It will age like the Lucic deal. Power forwards don't age gracefully. I say that as someone that really likes Landeskog.


Who would you replace that LW with? Either 1st or 4th line?
May 22, 2021 at 2:14 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
DontTradeDougie liked this.
May 22, 2021 at 2:16 p.m.
#4
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Gmonwy
Who would you replace that LW with? Either 1st or 4th line?


Mangiapane is a top 6 player. His 5 on 5 play is off the charts. He's scoring at 5 on 5 at a very elite rate, he's up there with guys like Brayden Point and Mark Stone in terms of 5 on 5 goals the past couple of seasons.

The Flames could trade Gaudreau or Tkachuk and still feel good about their LW depth because Mangiapane is a legit top 6 option
May 22, 2021 at 2:17 p.m.
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,168
Likes: 8,989
Id do it
SalamiCheese liked this.
May 22, 2021 at 2:19 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: ItWasIn
Mangiapane is a top 6 player. His 5 on 5 play is off the charts. He's scoring at 5 on 5 at a very elite rate, he's up there with guys like Brayden Point and Mark Stone in terms of 5 on 5 goals the past couple of seasons.

The Flames could trade Gaudreau or Tkachuk and still feel good about their LW depth because Mangiapane is a legit top 6 option


This better?
May 22, 2021 at 2:25 p.m.
#7
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: Gmonwy
This better?


Nothing wrong with signing Landeskog, I just wouldn't do it, that's just me though.

One thing I think the Flames really need to do this offseason is fix the RW. It's a mess.
Find out what BUF wants for Reinhart.
If Hyman hits UFA he's a player that I could see the Flames really targetting.
Either way, it's the biggest hole on the roster right now.
May 22, 2021 at 2:28 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
Quoting: Shibbal18
Id do it


In a separate deal what would Calgary have to give for Reinhart? Probably don't have the assets to get him now?
May 22, 2021 at 2:31 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 102
Likes: 41
This is the deal for Eichel, like I really don't see any other package that makes sense for both sides. Our RW depth is still a problem but that first line would be an absolute nightmare to play against.
May 22, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,919
Likes: 19,295
If Calgary wants to 100% get Eichel with no competition this is the deal, nobody is topping this. I still think the Flames can get him for less though
Gmonwy liked this.
May 22, 2021 at 3:40 p.m.
#11
Sabres fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 2,961
Quoting: Gmonwy
In a separate deal what would Calgary have to give for Reinhart? Probably don't have the assets to get him now?

If this were the trade for Jack Eichel the Sabres would have already gotten what they want from Calgary. You wouldn’t have anything left to offer that they would want. Mangiapane would be a nice player for Buffalo, but I’m sure you consider that a lateral move at best to get Reinhart. It also might not be a one for one deal.
May 22, 2021 at 4:20 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 941
Likes: 606
Quoting: ItWasIn

Find out what BUF wants for Reinhart.


Quoting: Gmonwy
In a separate deal what would Calgary have to give for Reinhart? Probably don't have the assets to get him now?


Buffalo probably don't get as much as people are expecting for Reinhart. Unlike Eichel, they don't have much leverage with Reinhart being 1 year from UFA. He's probably going for about TDL prices or maybe slightly higher: top prospect, young NHLer with some upside (Dube or someone similar), 1st.

Doubt both get traded to the same team.
May 22, 2021 at 4:55 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Solid
May 22, 2021 at 5:04 p.m.
#14
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,168
Likes: 8,989
Quoting: Gmonwy
In a separate deal what would Calgary have to give for Reinhart? Probably don't have the assets to get him now?


Probably not at that point. Lindholm 1 for 1
May 23, 2021 at 12:06 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 594
Likes: 155
Quoting: Gmonwy


Thank you for doing the extra work I was too lazy to do in mine lol
Gmonwy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll