SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How to Get Landy and Van Riemsdyk

Created by: Thunderbird838
Team: 2016-17 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 20, 2017
Published: Jan. 20, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. van Riemsdyk, James
  2. 2017 2nd round pick (SJS)
2.
ANA
  1. Landeskog, Gabriel ($1,071,429 retained)
3.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2018
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2019
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$73,000,000$64,641,595$0$0$8,358,405
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 5
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,504,887$2,504,887
RW, LW
UFA - 6
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 2
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,856,708$2,856,708
LD
UFA - 6
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 2
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 3
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 2
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RD
UFA - 5
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 20, 2017 at 7:31 a.m.
#1
Thunderbird
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 329
Likes: 4
Let me know what you guys think but please keep it classy
Jan. 20, 2017 at 7:44 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 225
Likes: 13
No pick from Leafs.

JVR for Vatanen straight up (we can retain).
Jan. 20, 2017 at 8:05 a.m.
#3
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 2,930
Likes: 1,061
Good trades. I definitely think there is a pick coming with JVR for Vatenen, maybe it's a third instead of second, but there would have to be something.
Jan. 20, 2017 at 8:09 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 147
JVR is a top 6 sniper can easily be on top line. Just curious as to why a pick would have to be involved?
Jan. 20, 2017 at 8:26 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 12
Quoting: Philu916
JVR is a top 6 sniper can easily be on top line. Just curious as to why a pick would have to be involved?


Because Vatenen has a Great contract for 4 year JVR will be a UFA after next year.
Jan. 20, 2017 at 11:52 a.m.
#6
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 3,388
Anaheim prides themselves on their defensive depth, I don't think they'd trade two of them. Maybe one of these deals happens, but not both.
Jan. 20, 2017 at 11:55 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 322
Likes: 31
Leafs don't need a small puck moving defender in their top 4. Rather target someone else. Especially at this price.

If your willing to deal Manson, then that is something that would interest me
Jan. 20, 2017 at 11:56 a.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,895
Likes: 23,458
Rebuilding Avs don't really need Fowler, maybe Montour and Ritchie would be a new start for Avs without salary retention. Of course this leads to cap problems for the Ducks. Maybe Stoner goes to Avs.
Jan. 20, 2017 at 12:26 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,700
Likes: 1,142
That CBJ trade would not be accepted. Korpisalo is the most valuable player in the trade. Anaheim would need to add more.
Jan. 20, 2017 at 1:28 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
Im not so sure about the colorado trade, we would have already lost one of our top 4 defenseman so we cant lose fowler as well, also i think ritche is a key piece to our future. I think maybe Montour, a 1st, and a 3rd for landy would work better for the ducks and the avs get pieces for a rebuild
Jan. 20, 2017 at 2:16 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
0% chance that Avs retain salary. If you want Landy you would have to offer more than that since you would be asking them to retain salary on a good player for multiple years
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll